
Illustration of a cove on the mythical
Photograph by Mary Evans Picture
Library/Everett Collection
If the writing of the ancient Greek
philosopher Plato had not contained so much truth about the human condition,
his name would have been forgotten centuries ago.
But one of his most famous stories—the
cataclysmic destruction of the ancient civilization of Atlantis—is almost
certainly false. So why is this story still repeated more than 2,300 years
after Plato's death?
"It's a story that captures the
imagination," says James Romm, a professor of classics at
Plato told the story of Atlantis around 360
B.C. The founders of Atlantis, he said, were half god and half human. They
created a utopian civilization and became a great naval power. Their home was
made up of concentric islands separated by wide moats and linked by a canal
that penetrated to the center. The lush islands contained gold, silver, and
other precious metals and supported an abundance of rare, exotic wildlife.
There was a great capital city on the central island.
There are many theories about where Atlantis
was—in the Mediterranean, off the coast of
Plato said Atlantis existed about 9,000 years
before his own time, and that its story had been passed down by poets, priests,
and others. But Plato's writings about Atlantis are the only known records of
its existence.
Possibly Based on Real Events?
Few, if any, scientists think Atlantis
actually existed. Ocean explorer Robert Ballard, the National Geographic
explorer-in-residence who discovered the wreck of the Titanic in 1985,
notes that "no Nobel laureates" have said that what Plato wrote about
Atlantis is true.
Still, Ballard says, the legend of Atlantis
is a "logical" one since cataclysmic floods and volcanic explosions
have happened throughout history, including one event that had some
similarities to the story of the destruction of Atlantis. About 3,600 years
ago, a massive volcanic eruption devastated the
But Ballard doesn't think Santorini was
Atlantis, because the time of the eruption on that island doesn't coincide with
when Plato said Atlantis was destroyed.
Romm believes Plato created the story of
Atlantis to convey some of his philosophical theories. "He was dealing
with a number of issues, themes that run throughout his work," he says.
"His ideas about divine versus human nature, ideal societies, the gradual
corruption of human society—these ideas are all found in many of his works.
Atlantis was a different vehicle to get at some of his favorite themes."
The legend of Atlantis is a story about a
moral, spiritual people who lived in a highly advanced, utopian civilization.
But they became greedy, petty, and "morally bankrupt," and the gods
"became angry because the people had lost their way and turned to immoral
pursuits," Orser says.
As punishment, he says, the gods sent
"one terrible night of fire and earthquakes" that caused Atlantis to
sink into the sea.
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/ancient/atlantis.html
There is a pertinent reference to Atlantis in one of Sri
Aurobindo’s letters. Although in it he speaks of the lost continent with
abundant caution—Atlantis: “according to tradition”—there is no doubt that he
accepts its existence in the pre-historic time as a fact. While projecting it
to the modern rational mind he does not want to be seen as one going by popular
beliefs, as one who is not in possession of solid researched data, it is pretty
obvious that at the back of this specific mention of it there is his
occult-yogic knowledge of things and events; otherwise he could have just
dropped any reference to it. We should also appreciate that Sri Aurobindo was
not presenting here a technically tight seminar paper to a professional
audience but was writing with a certain degree of informality as a private
letter to one who belonged to his inner circle. Here’s the letter: (Letters on Yoga, pp. 1-4)
There have been times when the
seeking for spiritual attainment was, at least in certain civilisations, more
intense and widespread than now or rather than it has been in the world in
general during the past few centuries. For now the curve seems to be the
beginning of a new turn of seeking which takes its start from what was achieved
in the past and projects itself towards a greater future. But always, even in
the age of the Vedas or in
The cycles of evolution tend always
upward, but they are cycles and do not ascend in a straight line. The process
therefore gives the impression of a series of ascents and descents, but what is
essential in the gains of the evolution is kept or, even if eclipsed for a
time, re-emerges in new forms suitable to the new ages. The creation has
descended all the degrees of being from the Supermind to Matter and in each
degree it has created a world, reign, plane or order proper to that degree. In
the creating of the material world there was a plunge of this descending
Consciousness into an apparent Inconscience and an emergence of it out of that
Inconscience, degree by degree, until it recovers its highest spiritual and
supramental summits and manifests their powers here in Matter. But even in the Inconscience
there is a secret Consciousness which works, one may say, by an involved and
hidden Intuition proper to itself. In each stage of Matter, in each stage of
Life, this Intuition assumes a working proper to that stage and acts from
behind the veil, supporting and enforcing the immediate necessities of the creative
Force. There is an Intuition in Matter which holds the action of the material
world from the electron to the sun and planets and their contents. There is an Intuition
in Life which similarly supports and guides the play and development of Life in
Matter till it is ready for the mental evolution of which man is the vehicle.
In man also the creation follows
the same upward process,—the Intuition within develops according to the stage
he has reached in his progress. Even the precise intellect of the scientist,
who is inclined to deny the separate existence or the superiority of Intuition,
yet cannot really move forward unless there is behind him a mental Intuition,
which enables him to take a forward step or to divine what has to be done.
Intuition therefore is present at the beginning of things and in their middle
as well as at their consummation.
But Intuition takes its proper form
only when one goes beyond the mental into the spiritual domain, for there only
it comes fully forward from behind the veil and reveals its true and complete
nature. Along with the mental evolution of man there has been going forward the
early process of another evolution which prepares the spiritual and supramental
being. This has had two lines, one the discovery of the occult forces secret in
Nature and of the hidden planes and worlds concealed from us by the world of
Matter and the other the discovery of man's soul and spiritual self. If the
tradition of Atlantis is correct, it is that of a progress which went to the
extreme of occult knowledge, but could go no farther. In the India of Vedic
times we have the record left of the other line of achievement, that of
spiritual self-discovery; occult knowledge was there but kept subordinate. We
may say that here in
The condition of present-day
civilisation, materialistic with an externalised intellect and life-endeavour,
which you find so painful, is an episode, but one which was perhaps inevitable.
For if the spiritualisation of the mind, life and body is the thing to be
achieved, the conscious presence of the Spirit even in the physical consciousness
and material body, an age which puts Matter and the physical life in the
forefront and devotes itself to the effort of the intellect to discover the
truth of material existence, had perhaps to come. On one side, by materialising
everything up to the intellect itself it has created the extreme difficulty of
which you speak for the spiritual seeker, but, on the other hand, it has given
the life in Matter an importance which the spirituality of the past was
inclined to deny to it. In a way it has made the spiritualisation of it a
necessity for spiritual seeking and so aided the descent movement of the
evolving spiritual consciousness in the earth-nature. More than that we cannot
claim for it; its conscious effect has been rather to stifle and almost
extinguish the spiritual element in humanity; it is only by the divine use of
the pressure of contraries and an intervention from above that there will be
the spiritual outcome.
~ RYD