But caps on greenhouse-gas emissions are largely symbolic.
LOS ANGELES AND BOSTON –
California's landmark deal to require a 25 percent
cut in industrial greenhouse gases by 2020 is a largely symbolic
victory with only a tiny impact on climate. But it's one that could
prompt significant change in the nation's stance on global warming -
and give the state a competitive edge in future years.
The agreement, which has not yet cleared the state
legislature, would require industries - including oil refineries,
chemical manufacturers, and utilities - to slash carbon-dioxide
emissions.
Coming just two weeks after seven Northeast states
officially approved a cap on CO2 emissions from electric utilities,
California's far broader measure could presage a growing push among
states to cut emissions.
Thus far, the Bush administration has resisted efforts
to institute federal mandatory reductions on CO2 that might increase
costs to business and harm the economy. Many California business groups
also worry the measure will encourage businesses to locate elsewhere.
"We are very concerned that this bill will send the
message to manufacturers in California and the rest of the world that
it's going to be tougher to do business in California," says Dorothy
Rothrock, vice president of government relations for the California
Manufacturers and Technology Association. The mandate "goes way beyond
measures that are cost effective," she adds.
California is the world's ninth-largest emitter of
greenhouse gases. But even the major cuts it is proposing will have
only a tiny effect because carbon emissions are growing so quickly,
climate experts say.
"By itself it doesn't do much. It's main significance
is in providing leadership," says Robert Dickinson, past president of
the American Geophysical Union. "Even though this is just a little bit,
a lot of little bits add up."
The US is the largest greenhouse gas emitter in the
world, with 19 tons emitted per person per year, while California emits
12 tons per capita. If the US slashed per capita emissions to current
California levels, the US would cut its output to 1.7 billion tons
below the targets set by the international Kyoto agreement, state
officials estimate.
The bill sets a cap on all of California's greenhouse
gas emissions, and requires them to return to 1990 levels by 2020 -
roughly a 25 percent cut compared to business as usual. The bill is not
specific about how to achieve it, but it says regulators may adopt a
trading scheme so that plants having trouble cutting emissions could
buy emissions credits from plants that have made the cuts.
Despite some business concerns, others have gotten on
board the energy efficiency train. Dow Chemical, which has four
manufacturing sites in California, has slashed its energy use
nationwide by 20 percent over the past decade. The company's new goal -
a further 25 percent cut by 2015 - dovetails with California's effort.
"If we put together all the existing policies not yet
fully implemented, that gets us a third of the way to meeting the new
caps," says Jason Mark, California director of the Union of Concerned
Scientists. "But new policies will be needed to get all the way there.
That can include additional limits on other sources of emissions."
Despite the challenge getting to the goal, some experts
say the push will make California more energy efficient, giving its
industries an energy cost advantage and a leg up on their competition.
"In the long term, over the next decade, this is going
to be a big plus for California's economy," says R. Neal Elliott,
industrial program director at the American Council for Energy
Efficient Economy in Washington. "Businesses in the state are going to
be more competitive and less exposed to risk of volatile energy prices
in the future."
While some worry the easy and inexpensive trims to CO2
emissions have been taken already, experts like Dr. Elliott say even
California where much has already been done to trim energy use, there
are still plenty of savings to be made. "In reality, we aren't anywhere
close in any of these industries to tapping out our ability to save
energy," he says. "It's really a situation of learning by doing, the
more energy savings you look for, the more you find."
Cutting California's greenhouse emissions to 1990
levels by 2020 could boost the state's economy by $74 billion and
create 88,000 new jobs, according to a new University of California at
Berkeley study.
Some businesses have already made significant gains.
DuPont, the big chemical company, has cut its greenhouse gas emissions
by nearly 70 percent since 1990, saving about $2 billion. Similarly,
IBM has saved nearly $800 million, thanks to its 65 percent cut in its
emissions in the same period, the state's environmental protection
agency reports.
Environmentalists cheered the deal, saying it would get the ball rolling nationally and bring other states on board.
"The big picture is that the rest of the world has been
waiting around for years for the US to do something on global warming,"
says Bernadette Del Chiaro of Environment California, a nonprofit
environmental group. "We have not seen any action on the national level
and California is stepping up and joining the rest of the world in
solving global warming."
| California's emission-reduction plan |
|
• Begin reducing carbon-dioxide emissions in 2012, cutting them by 25 percent by 2020.
• Measure greenhouse-gas emissions of electric power plants, refineries, cement kilns, and other major emitters.
• Set limits for each facility.
• Create, if necessary, a trading system so that heavy emitters
could buy credits from emissions-cutting companies rather than closing
operations or moving out of state. | |