Auroville Today
Dec. 2001
A grassroots spirituality
Interview by Carel and Bindu
Dr. Ananda Reddy is well-known in Auroville because of his weekly classes in Sri Aurobindo's The Life Divine at the Savitri Bhavan. He grew up in the Sri Aurobindo Ashram "at the feet of The Mother", then went on, with her permission, to become a liaison between the Ashram and Auroville. Soon afterwards, in 1970, he joined Auroville to teach at the Aspiration school. He left Auroville in 1976, obtained a Ph.D. in Sri Aurobindo's philosophy at Osmania University in Hyderabad, and is today one of the few scholars worldwide who present Sri Aurobindo's thought within India and abroad. Recently he founded the Sri Aurobindo Centre for Advanced Research (SACAR) in Pondicherry. Auroville Today interviewed him on his work.
AVToday: How do you generally present Sri Aurobindo's thought?
Ananda: It depends on where I am in the world, and whether I am addressing an audience that already knows about Sri Aurobindo, or one that is hearing his name for the first time. With Aurobindonians, I can go more into depth and speak from the heart. If there is a general audience, I speak from the mind and give basically Sri Aurobindo's philosophy of life, and in a later phase his metaphysics. I do not talk about Sri Aurobindo the person, because I am aware that there are many cults in the world, and people are bound to label us as one more cult.
If there is a series of lectures, I talk about Sri Aurobindo as a person in a second and third lecture. I present him as a person whose life has been integral, as one who has developed this thought on the basis of his own realizations. I explain how he has embraced the philosophical thoughts of India and the West, and how he has gone beyond religions towards a universal spirituality. Then I explain how his spirituality differs from the normal idea of spirituality, that there is no withdrawing from life but rather of divinising life and, ultimately, Matter. In this way there is a balanced presentation of the thought and the man behind it. If I would reverse the order, it would most probably be taken as a cult.
The tendency to turn Sri Aurobindo's teaching into a cult seems to be prevalent everywhere. Many quote the words of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, often out of context and to suit their own purposes. Is there a danger that by doing this we will turn the Integral Yoga into yet another a religion?
I once asked Champaklal why Sri Aurobindo's philosophy was being subjected to this sort of religiosity, and he answered that it was a passing phase and that Sri Aurobindo's thought and consciousness are too universal to be turned into a religion.
It is true that many people are getting into the trap of "Mother said". In fact this is a passive complacency, it is not the right attitude. It is a metaphysical truth that what we call "the Mother's Force" is at work in this world. But if there is sunlight outside, I still must open my window to let it in. Quoting Mother and Sri Aurobindo does not imply that you let that force into your life and perhaps, many who quote do not.
Quoting is often a sign of a beginners' aspiration. When one is a newcomer to this yoga, one needs external symbols to hold onto one's faith.
It is like putting a fence around a young plant to protect it. Quoting Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, offering incense or flowers at their Samadhi, paying homage to their pictures are necessary external aids to help one's aspiration. They are like ladders that help us to climb up.
To embark on a spiritual life requires a great amount of courage. The human mind is often not ready to give up its religious attitude and that is the reason why many who have accepted Sri Aurobindo and The Mother continue to worship different godheads and gurus.
There is a certain amount of human inertia that prevents people from exploring the spiritual life on the basis of their inner faith alone. But if one learns to consciously use the external forms, even the adoration of the gods, as a "ladder," then one comes to a stage where one feel the Presence within and the outside help is no longer needed. When one is up, one no longer needs the ladder.
Some Aurovilians feel the need to use other methods and techniques to realize a spiritual consciousness perhaps as another 'ladder.' What are your views on this?
It all depends on the individual. Normally I would say that if one feels the need to relate to other approaches for one's spiritual growth, that's fine. I do not believe that any barriers should be imposed in Auroville, that one must do only this and nothing else. Let individuals choose any technique that they want, let the experience be rich, and let's not narrow spiritual life into one strict path. The only conditions needed are sincerity and the aspiration for a higher life, what I would call faithfulness, the faith the Bhagavad Gita speaks of, the shraddha, the inner dedication, the inner wanting to be that ideal. Let's guard against becoming another 'ism'.
One should not perhaps even insist that a person follow Sri Aurobindo or the Mother, but as the Mother herself emphasized, one should be a sincere seeker of the Divine Truth and Perfection. At one point something within the person may drive him or her to that discovery which is the Mother's Presence or Force. For those who have chosen to live in Auroville, I would say that, sooner or later, something will lead them to Sri Aurobindo and the Mother because of the special atmosphere that They have established in Auroville. It is not a question of developing mental knowledge and reading The Life Divine or The Synthesis of Yoga, but of developing an inner need where it becomes essential to find Sri Aurobindo and the Mother in one's life. It is the need for the inner discovery.
When I wanted to leave the Ashram to continue my studies in America in 1970, I asked The Mother's permission. Her answer was remarkable: "Ifyou aspire to get ready for the future and the new creation it prepares, remain here and prepare yourself for what is to come." On another occasion when asked about the Divine help being available everywhere, She said something to the effect, "The Divine help is available everywhere, but we have prepared here a special atmosphere because of which it becomes easier in this place for one to realize one's soul."
The presence of such an atmosphere, which is so needed for the psychic realization is, I believe, the reason why so many people visit the Ashram in Pondicherry. Somehow, in some way their psychic being has reached a point where it is coming forward and they need to breathe this atmosphere. This perhaps explains also the pressure of people wanting to come to Auroville.
For those who already have the inner connection, I do not believe that experimenting with different paths is of any help, it is only a waste of time. For instance, I have noticed that the so-called gains of meditation retreats are only temporary. For a week or so, the ego feels satisfied, for one achieves a certain mental silence or clarity, but then one falls back into the usual chaos of one's life and no change is effected in the outer workings of life. If one's goal is Integral Yoga or the transformation of oneself, then as Sri Aurobindo says, it is the Mother's Shakti alone that can help us in reaching the goal.
So for those who do not have an inner contact, these practices are good approach points, but those who do should not go back to them. They are windows to enter the house, but not doors to go out.
It is often argued that, even after one has established an inner connection with the Mother, there are times when one feels disconnected, and that one is not progressing in one's spiritual life. Then there is sometimes a desire to follow other paths.
But I do not believe that in these instances experimenting with different paths will help. It is much better, as Sri Aurobindo has explained in many letters to his disciples, not to be perturbed, not to ask yourself too many questions about whether you are progressing or not. For how do you know that you are not progressing? It is only your mind that might think otherwise, for often something is being worked out in us behind the surface being. If one remains quiet, with a quiet trust in The Mother, then suddenly something new comes and we have the certainty that we are on the way once again! For those who have that inner connection, a silent aspiration, a deep trust and reliance on Mother's force are of great importance.
There is a danger in Auroville of a constant dilution of the spiritual atmosphere, as there is a continuous inflow of new people who have not had any exposure to Sri Aurobindo and the Mother. For that there must be a core group of conscious sadhaks there to withstand this kind of inflow, and to serve as living examples. For instance, in the Sri Aurobindo Ashram, after the Mother's passing, we looked to Nolini and Champaklal and a few others for help. So, if there is a concrete vibration from an inside group of sadhaks who are open exclusively to the Mother's Force, then the newcomers will feel the difference in that vibration and seek it out for guidance. But it is important that the newcomers are aware of the reason why they want to join Auroville. If one comes to Auroville drawn by any of its outer aspects, then things do not work out. If one comes to serve the Divine Consciousness call it Mother, Sri Aurobindo or whatever as stated in the Auroville Charter, then spiritual progress is bound to happen.
You speak about 'opening to The Mother's Force' and 'finding Sri Aurobindo and the Mother in one's life'. Could you explain in a few words what exactly is meant by this?
What we mean by the Mother's Force is the Divine Force that descends from above to transform our nature into the divine nature. It is specifically the transformative force of the Divine that we call the Mother's Force.
One can open to it by opening the heart centre and the mind centres to all that is above and behind them. This can be done principally by aspiration, prayer, bhakti, surrender to the divine Force and rejection of all that stands in the way of what we aspire for.
As regards finding them in our life what I mean is that Sri Aurobindo and the Mother represent a certain Consciousness which stands for a transformation of one's nature and not for an individualistic inner realization alone. Most may not be ready for such a change of consciousness or transformation of one's nature. They may not even feel the need for such a thing. And as long as they do not feel such a need they are not inwardly ready for the discovery of Sri Aurobindo in their life. But, it is alright. Not all are meant to be disciples of Sri Aurobindo. There are myriad ways of evolution and each soul chooses its own destined path!
Earlier you had mentioned that Sri Aurobindo's concept of spirituality is different from others. In what way is it so?
Sri Aurobindo's concept of spirituality differs from other concepts because of his insistence on surrender to and reliance on the Universal Shakti, what we call the Mother's Force. This crucial concept in the Integral Yoga represents the working of a Force from above that can help us in our sadhana, and carry us to our goal. It is often not realised that this reliance on the Mother's Force is the greatest possible shortcut for man's spiritual growth. In fact, it is an invaluable spiritual boon given to mankind by Sri Aurobindo.
To develop this relationship between oneself and the Universal Shakti, reading the works of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother even if one is experimenting with other spiritual paths is very necessary, because the consciousness and force of their words sink into your subconscious and hasten the discovery of your inner being.
But there are, of course, also other ways to connect with this force and with the presence of the Mother within to the awareness of your own psychic being. The Mother stressed the importance of work for all sadhaks of this yoga. Once She wrote to me: "It is in the work that we must progress and purify ourselves". It is my own experience that the most intense contact with the Mother is through work. Meditation is still born of the mind and has a tendency towards withdrawal from life. But work is of extreme importance in Integral Yoga, work that is inwardly dedicated to the Divine in the spirit of karma yoga. Work per se, of course, has no value.
The Mother said that after fifty years, Sri Aurobindo's thought will have been accepted in the world. How far has that been realised?
I think fully. Sri Aurobindo's consciousness has established itself in the world in different ways. Sri Aurobindo and the Mother have sown seed-thoughts all over the world-and Auroville is one such seed-thought blossoming out into reality. Today, I find all open-minded thinkers in the world expounding ideas that have been outlined by Sri Aurobindo. The terms that they use differ according to their cultural and social background, but the general line of their thinking is in keeping with Sri Aurobindo's vision and understanding. The concepts of evolution of consciousness, transformation, the validity of a spiritual life as the only way out for our present problems are spreading throughout the world.
It may well be that in the future Sri Aurobindo's name will not be known, but all will be united by his consciousness the Supramental. Sri Aurobindo may not be accepted necessarily as a spiritual leader in fact he need not be for then his philosophy would become another narrow 'ism' but as the herald of a new consciousness, the Supramental Con-sciousness, and as the harbinger of the New Race beyond the human species.
What effects of the working of the Supramental Consciousness do you see in the world?
One of the workings of the Supramental Consciousness is in the cleansing of all falsehoods. All these millenia falsehood was lying low and disrupting spiritual progress from behind. Now, due to the working of the Supramental Consciousness, everywhere, wherever there is a falsehood in the individual, family, caste, group or nation it is being exposed. Religion has allowed falsehoods to hide, but now, it is an open battle. That's how I view the struggles in the world today, and I am not disturbed by all the violence and the wars that are going on in different forms.
Another working of the Supramental Consciousness is the inexplicable universalization of spiritual thought. Everywhere one finds a growing number of individuals who are embarking on a spiritual quest. Tomorrow's world may not need avatars or vibhutis anymore. The time of the great spiritual leaders and intellects and visionaries will slowly recede. In the same way that grass springs up after the first rainfall, a new spiritual consciousness is emerging everywhere due to the downpour of the Supramental Force and Consciousness on the world. That new Consciousness will approach each open and aspiring individual at the grassroots level in the manner needed by him or her. It is the time of the spirituality of the common man. The spirituality of tomorrow will belong to mankind as a whole, not to the religious and moralist elite. That is why I emphasize that it does not matter if Sri Aurobindo is known or is not recognised much tomorrow, for the Supramental Consciousness will awaken mankind in general to spirituality and thus fulfil the work for which both The Mother and Sri Aurobindo have taken birth this time.
- end -
|
||||||||
|
Create a free Reader Account
to post comments. Login
Get free daily SCIY Notable SCIY Topics
Search
Recent Visitors
RY Deshpande - Jul 20, 10:18AM
lathamaha - Jul 19, 05:59AM
Vladimir - Jul 19, 12:27AM
yeshwant sane - Jul 18, 05:53PM
Rich - Jul 18, 01:36PM
Naru - Jul 17, 11:46PM
ronjon - Jul 16, 04:37PM
adam pogioli - Jul 15, 03:50PM
varenassi - Jul 13, 09:16AM
rakesh - Jul 12, 11:49AM
The Best of SCIY
Category Folders (below) Click folder names for contained articles, Click 'Main Page' to return. Month Archive
|
"A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
ronjon
on Mon 22 May 2006 02:41 PM PDT | Permanent Link
Comments
Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
Rich
on Mon 22 May 2006 06:39 PM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
I certainly would agree with Ananda that the Mother says this, Mother says that, approach to the yoga are constraints for both individual and collective progress. And Ananda make some good points here as to hallmarks of authentic practice
However, I would perhaps, be a bit more cautious in ascribing any particular characteristics or particular workings in the world today as being attributible to the "supramental consciousness" One can speculate to no ends whether this or that event is a result of some spiritual force. However, this results in the use of metaphysical language that is privileged to the user or to the community from which it originates, and can cut off wider intersubjective dialog with others, as well as easily morph into ideology. ( A Christian would probably describe world events in terms of his/her metaphysical own system. ) Of course since this article is in an Auroville Today issue, he is sort of preaching to the choir, so no problem in the context. I just would be a bit squirmish myself ascribing any actions to a phenomena that wholly transcends the mental plane, and can not be communicatively expressed other than as metaphor. rc Re: Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
ronjon
on Tue 23 May 2006 01:02 PM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Hi Rich,
You say: "..However, I would perhaps, be a bit more cautious in ascribing any particular characteristics or particular workings in the world today as being attributable to the "supramental consciousness" ... Well, as you know, I have a perhaps slightly different view on this. Of course, as you say we have to be "cautious" that our speech re "supramental" actions or consciousness is as discerning as we're capable of. Yet, I'm concerned that if we completely disallow such conjectures, we could "throw out the baby with the bathwater," as it were. 1) How else are we to "evidence" the core IY assertion that there is some kind of divinely-inspired action occurring in the world? For example, I like how Gebser speaks it in his opus The Ever-Present Origin: "It is not sufficient for us to merely furnish a postulate; rather it will be necessary to show the latent possibilities in us and in our present, possibilities that are about to become acute. .. A mere interpretation of our times is inadequate. We must furnish concrete evidence of phenomena that are clearly revealed as being new..." p. 4. 2) The possibility that our consciously focusing on certain events as evidence of "a pressure for supramentalisation" can have a feedback effect on the events themselves, a self-fulfilling prophecy kind of action. Gebser: "We have only one option: in examining the manifestations of our age, we must .. not focus our view merely on these phenomena, but rather on the humus of the decaying world beneath, where the seedlings of the future are growing, immeasurable in their potential and vigor. Since our insight into the energies pressing toward development aids their unfolding, the seedlings and inceptive beginnings must be made visible and comprehensible." p. 4. As you see Rich, you've created a monster by gifting me Gebser's book ... ~ ron Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
Rich
on Tue 23 May 2006 08:12 PM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Ron
I should clarify that I dont mean here that we should not all aspire to bring down the "grace", rather that to look for signs of the supramental is a bit like trying to establish a semiotics of the Divine. If so one would need to be able to discern Divine intention. However, since we are all merely mental beings to try and interpret the Divine intention is inevitibly to mentalize it. In mentalizing the supramental one is back to what Derrida calls the "transcendental signified" which can always be deconstructed into a play of "differance", and which always risk becoming mere ideology Therefore, I prefer to refrain from naming the phenomena, because once one does so one inevitibly enters into the stream of karmic action, into an endless chain of signifiers which can only defer, and differ from each other. e.g a co-dependent arising of phenomena. Therefore, I prefer to follow Derrida in this regard and conceive the future as L'Avenir rather than as a future which is frought with our own projections, determined by our past experiences. Here is a rather well known quote from Derrida which sums up the matter. In it I think one can understand what he refers to as the "Other" in this sense as being akin to the Divine In general, I try and distinguish between what one calls the Future and “l’avenir” [the ‘to come]. The future is that which – tomorrow, later, next century – will be. There is a future which is predictable, programmed, scheduled, foreseeable. But there is a future, l’avenir (to come) which refers to someone who comes whose arrival is totally unexpected. For me, that is the real future. That which is totally unpredictable. The Other who comes without my being able to anticipate their arrival. So if there is a real future, beyond the other known future, it is l’avenir in that it is the coming of the Other when I am completely unable to foresee their arrival. Re: Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
ronjon
on Tue 30 May 2006 01:46 AM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Hi Rich,
Interesting quote from Derrida re the distinction between the so-called "Future" and "l'avenir, ... that which is totally unpredictable." Hmm, what do you think Derrida would say about retrodictions vs. predictions of l'avenir? For example, he uses the phrase "l'avenir ... refers to someone who comes whose arrival is totally unexpected." I wonder if he would consider "the coming of Christ" as an example of l'avenir? If that event doesn't work for him, does he give any historic examples of l'avenir? If so, then do you think my own retrodictive search for possible instances of "supramental pressure," defined as events which were totally unexpected or unpredicted, especially by specialists within a given field, and which appear to have had a corrective influence on problematique trends, could be examples of l'avenir? As you know, I've offered the development of the Open Source movement as a possible example. And if you still dislike any use of the word "supramental, supramental pressure", etc. to define these events, then what would you suggest as a more appropriate terminology? ~ ron Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
Rich
on Tue 30 May 2006 09:01 AM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Ron
First of all let me self-disclose in that I am an old curmudgeon prone to skepticism and I dont mean to play the role of language police, its just a reflection of the aches and pains of my aging so please use terminology in any way you see fit. That said, when thinking L'avenir as Derrida discloses it, I am reminded of the voice of the Mother reading the Hour of God when she says: "dont let worldly prudence whisper too closely in thy ear for it is the hour of the unexpected." now here is Derrida: "But there is a future, l’avenir (to come) which refers to someone who comes whose arrival is totally unexpected" So since all words serve a binary function e.g. refer to some other concept e.g black implies white. or as Derrida would say the implicitness of the term white in black is a function of "the trace" . You may also call this co-dependent arising. But the trace within any term implies all the other terms it differs and defers to. Thus being (as the exclusive meaning of one part of the binary pair never quite arrives, for it always must refer to something else to fully invoke its meaning) Therefore, in a very real sense "being" is only present through its absence. (because every presence (word) refers to that which is absent ( its binary other half) So the word supermind is also a binary word, and evokes immediately the word, mind, or infra-mind, which invoke still other words, consciousness, subconsciousness, which invoke still other terms vital consciousness, physical consciousness which invoke other words such as mind emotions, the body, which invoke other terms such as knowledge, love, death which still invoke other words in an endless chain. But that besides the idea of "the unexpected" I resist using the term because I find those on the integral yoga path invoke it, often in the same manner Christians invoke the "second coming", which has implications of a millenium Cult. As such one begins to accept the conditions of the world, however unjust, as somehow involving a future state which will be transcended. And so seen ones refrain from action in the world for social justice, may become to be seen as justified, as the Supermind (second coming) will fix it all anyway So I refer to this great pressure we all feel here in the exponential acceleration of science and technology, simply as "an evolutionary pressure" I do this because I feel the evolution is something we can scientifically speak of, and it can be understood in inter-subjective discourse with others who may not share my spiritual worldwiew. Now is the evolutionary pressure for me the same as the descent of supermind... I truthfully cant answer that one but I am more comfortable using the term former term. The term the other is interesting too in that it can be used as the other (with a small o) or the Other (with a capital O) The other with small o refers to other people whom I can never know, who are wholly different then I am, and existentionalist writers such as Sarte or Camus would use it in such expression as "hell is other people" However Ricoeur,Derrida and other post-modernist scholars also refer to the Other as that higher aspect of ourselves (e.g. our soul) which is so distant to our consciousness now as to be Other. So in reference to you Linux question in the context you speak of it e.g. technology, I would say that it is coming of the Other in an extremely positive sense. rich Re: Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
ronjon
on Tue 30 May 2006 03:16 PM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Rich,
I'm fine about using the phrase "evolutionary pressure" and variants thereof instead of ones using "supra/supra -mind," no problemo. Your point re the former phrase being more appropriate for inter-subjective discourse is well-taken, especially because such discourse is one of the primary purposes of SCIY. What about my question re the distinction between predictive and retrodictive analyses of what we both I think agree are fundamentally unpredictable events? ~ ron Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
Rich
on Tue 30 May 2006 08:42 PM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
could you 'splain retrodictive and predictive a bit more... Re: Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
ronjon
on Wed 31 May 2006 10:14 AM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
>could you 'splain retrodictive and predictive a bit more...
Sure. I'm using prediction in the normal sense of the term; testing hypotheses or theories by using them to predict future events. And here's the definition of retrodiction from the Free Dictionary: "Retrodiction (or postdiction, though this should not be confused with the use of the term in criticisms of parapsychological research) is the act of making a prediction about the past. This is especially useful when one wishes to test a theory whose actual predictions are too long-term to be of immediate use. The theory is used to manipulate data concerning the more distant past in order to predict an event in the less distant past. This is useful in, for example, the fields of archaeology, evolutionary biology, forensic science, and cosmology." Re: "A grassroots spirituality:" Auroville Today interview with Dr. Ananda Reddy
by
Rich
on Wed 31 May 2006 04:43 PM PDT | Profile | Permanent Link
I dont think that l'avenir, the supramental maifestation, can be discerned by either predictive or retrodictive means, although one could perhaps point to catastrophic bifrucations in past geological history or the history of life itself, and point to the potential of a "rupture" which could alter the history of the planet.
So seen one can point to specific cultural or technological "ruptures" which fundamentally altered culture whose implications were almost unforeseen in advance, such as the "internet". Actually as you know history is littered with such unintended consequences. Paul Virilio has an interesting take on this when he says new technologies all have their "accident" couched within. rich |
SCIY Index & Page Views
View SCIY Slide Shows
Recent Articles
July 20 Quote of the Day
ronjon
July 19 Quote of the Day
ronjon
Literature and Consciousness—by Shruti Bidwaikar
RY Deshpande
July 18 Quote of the Day
ronjon
Diamonds hint at 'earliest life'—by Jonathan Fildes
RY Deshpande
July 17 Quote of the Day
ronjon
Taming a “ferocious” monkey—by Serena Josephine. M
RY Deshpande
July 16 Quote of the Day
ronjon
July 15 Quote of the Day
ronjon
July 14 Quote of the Day
ronjon
July 13 Quote of the Day
ronjon
Recent Comments
Full text of Comments
Recent Book Reviews
Recommended Links
|
||||||
|
||||||||