101 rh. Re: a response to the question why, how - Jaspers, pt.3
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rod Hemsell <rodhemsell@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: a response to the question why, how - Jaspers, pt.3
Message - 101/149
Part 3: Reason and Communication
Through the secure validity of a common principle that permeated all
everyday life, there was, almost until the present time, a cohesion
among men which rarely permitted communication to become a special
problem. People could content themselves with the saying: we can pray
together, but not talk together. Today, when we cannot even pray
together, we are at length becoming fully aware that humanity implies
unreserved communication among men.
Manifested being is fragmented by the multiplicity of our own sources
of faith, and of the historical form of our communities, each with its
own special background. The only things we have identically in common
are science and technology as reflected in the general categories of the
understanding. These however are united only in an abstract, universal
consciousness; in practice they serve both as weapons and media of
communication. Everything real in man is historical. But historicity
means also multiple historicity. Hence the postulates of true
communication are:
1 ) to become concerned with the historically different without becoming untrue to one's own historicity –
2) to reveal the relativity of scientific truth, while fully recognizing its just claims –
3) to abandon the claim of faith to exclusivity because of the
breach of communication it implies, yet without losing the absoluteness
of one's own fundament –
4) to take up the inevitable struggle with the historically
different, but to sublimate the battle in the loving battle, in
communication through the truth that develops when men act in common,
not as abstract individuals –
5) to orient ourselves toward the depths that are disclosed only
with the division into manifold historicities, to one of which I
belong, but which all concern me and which all together guide me to
that source.
Philosophical faith is inseparable from complete
openness to communication. For authentic truth arises only where faiths
meet in the
presence of the Comprehensive. …
Boundless openness to communication is not the consequence of any
knowledge, it is the decision to follow a human road. The idea of
communication is not utopia, but faith. Each man is confronted with the
question whether he strives toward it, whether he believes in it, not
as in something otherworldly , but as in something utterly actual;
whether he believes in our potentiality really to live together, to
speak together, through this togetherness to find our way to the
truth, and hereby finally to become authentically ourselves.
(Jaspers, 1950)