From: "Richard" (mrcarlson@olympus.net)
Date: July 18, 2005 3:29:59 PM PDT
To: rjon@vzavenue.net
Subject: Re: Questioning Neo-Darwinism
Reply-To: postaum2005@sriaurobindocenter-la.com
(Discussion List Post-AUM 2005): Replying to this email will send it to all members of the Post-AUM list.
Hi Don
I
think the example just restates what Michael alluded to, namely that
these guys can't really agree among themselves, are always debating and
the whole scientific enterprise is constantly in flux . In this
instance you have a very liberal Darwinist ( Gould ) versus a Ultra
Darwinist (Dennet) . I guess the biologist I really like however, is
Brian Goodwin -who you probably already know- who is at Shumacher
College and the Open University in London. He has a running debate with
Richard Dawkins concerning self organizing systems versus natural
selection. Goodwin is heavily influenced by Goethean Biology and as
such is close to my heart (Sri Aurobindo called Goethe a Vibhuti) but
he also argues for the primacy of morphology in explaining many facets
of evolution.
here is a blurb from http://66.201.42.16/viewitem.php3?id=79&catid=66&kbid=ionsikc
Brian
Goodwin, in contrast to the majority of biologists who emphasize
randomness and chance in evolution, prefers to affirm the "deep
intelligibility of nature". A Canadian by birth, he studied biology at
McGill University and mathematics at Oxford, an education which has
aided him in his desire to introduce into biology some of the basic
ideas of modern physics and mathematics such as field theory and
complex dynamics. He went on to study with the eminent C. H. Waddington
at Edinburgh, from which stems his lasting interest in the
relationships between the growth and development of organisms and their
evolution.
Goodwin's work at the Open University includes many
practical research projects?"from the investigation of dynamic patterns
in fruit-fly development to the mathematics of leaf and flower
patterns?"which are finding resonances with past scientific thinkers,
such as Goethe and those of the Hermetic Tradition, who affirmed the
intrinsic order and harmony of nature. He still makes time to
participate actively in wider issues, such as health and the
environment and global ecology, which he sees as irrevocably linked to
the way in which we understand life itself.
epistemologically yo's
rich
Note:
this email was sent by a member of the post-Aum 2005 ignoramus club
anyone of higher intelligence attempting to discern meaning from the
contents herein maybe sorely disappointed. Its unauthorized
reproduction is permitted as long as you take its message both explicit
and implicit with a grain of salt.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan Maslow
To: rcarlson@olympus.net
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Questioning Neo-Darwinism
(Discussion List Post-AUM 2005): Replying to this email will send it to all members of the Post-AUM list.
this is great rich, thanks so much. gould continues to surprise me.
|
||||||||
|
Create a free Reader Account
to post comments. Login
Get free daily SCIY Notable SCIY Topics
Search
Recent Visitors
Debashish - Oct 13, 09:13AM
ned - Oct 13, 08:21AM
Surendra - Oct 13, 03:23AM
koantum - Oct 13, 01:06AM
Srinivasan Krishnan Ayyangar - Oct 13, 12:13AM
rakesh - Oct 12, 11:30PM
Rich - Oct 12, 09:43PM
Rick - Oct 12, 07:01PM
Chandra - Oct 11, 01:36PM
Vladimir - Oct 10, 05:13AM
The Best of SCIY
Category Folders (below) Click folder names for contained articles, Click 'Main Page' to return. Month Archive
|
061 rc. Biologist B. Goodwin affirms "deep intelligibility of nature"
by
ronjon
on Mon 18 Jul 2005 03:30 PM PDT | Permanent Link
No comments found.
|
SCIY Index & Page Views
View SCIY Slide Shows
Recent Articles
Drill baby drill!
Rich
What is SCIY ?
ronjon
Recent Comments
Full text of Comments
Recent Book Reviews
Recommended Links
|
||||||
|
||||||||