Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Four;Man and the Evolution

Integral Yoga Literature – By Sri Aurobindo

Selections from the Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library

from Volume 18 and 19, The Life Divine


COPYRIGHT NOTICE:

The contents of this document are copyright 1972, Sri Aurobindo Ashram
Trust, Pondicherry, India. You may make a digital copy or printout of
this text for your personal, non-commercial use under the condition
that you copy this document without modifications and in its entirety,
including this copyright notice.



Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Four, “Man and the Evolution” (Part 1 of 3)



The one Godhead secret in all beings, all-pervading, the inner Self
of all, presiding over all action, witness, conscious knower and
absolute… the One in control over the many who are passive to
Nature, fashions one seed in many ways.

Swetaswatara Upanishad VI. 11, 12.


The Godhead moves in this Field modifying each web of things separately in
many ways…. One, he presides over all wombs and natures; himself the womb
of all, he is that which brings to ripeness the nature of the being and he
gives to all who have to be matured their result of development and appoints
all qualities to their workings.

Swetaswatara Upanishad V. 3-5.


He fashions one form of things in many ways.

Katha Upanishad II. 2. 12.


Who has perceived this truth occult, that the Child gives being to
the Mothers by the workings of his nature? An offspring from the lap
of many Waters, he comes forth from them a seer possessed of his whole
law of nature. Manifested, he grows in the lap of their crookednesses
and becomes high, beautiful and glorious.

Rig Veda I. 95. 4, 5.


From the non-being to true being, from the darkness to the Light, from
death to Immortality.

Brihadaranyaka Upanishad I. 3. 28.

A SPIRITUAL evolution, an evolution of consciousness in Matter in a
constant developing self-formation till the form can reveal the
indwelling Spirit, is then the key-note, the central significant
motive of the terrestrial existence. This significance is concealed at
the outset by the involution of the Spirit, the Divine Reality, in a
dense material Inconscience; a veil of Inconscience, a veil of
insensibility of Matter hides the universal Consciousness-Force which
works within it, so that the Energy, which is the first form the Force
of creation assumes in the physical universe, appears to be itself
inconscient and yet does the works of a vast occult Intelligence. The
obscure mysterious creatrix ends indeed by delivering the secret
consciousness out of its thick and tenebrous prison; but she delivers
it slowly, little by little, in minute infinitesimal drops, in
thin jets, in small vibrant concretions of energy and substance, of life,
of mind, as if that were all she could get out through the crass obstacle,
the dull reluctant medium of an inconscient stuff of existence. At first she
houses herself in forms of Matter which appear to be altogether unconscious,
then struggles towards mentality in the guise of living Matter and attains
to it imperfectly in the conscious animal. This consciousness is at first
rudimentary, mostly a half subconscious or just conscious instinct; it
develops slowly till in more organised forms of living Matter it reaches its
climax of intelligence and exceeds itself in Man, the thinking animal who
develops into the reasoning mental being but carries along with him even at
his highest elevation the mould of original animality, the dead weight of
subconscience of body, the downward pull of gravitation towards the original
Inertia and Nescience, the control of an inconscient material Nature over
his conscious evolution, its power for limitation, its law of difficult
development, its immense force for retardation and frustration. This control
by the original Inconscience over the consciousness emerging from it takes
the general shape of a mentality struggling towards knowledge but itself, in
what seems to be its fundamental nature, an Ignorance. Thus hampered and
burdened, mental man has still to evolve out of himself the fully conscious
being, a divine manhood or a spiritual and supramental supermanhood which
shall be the next product of the evolution. That transition will mark the
passage from the evolution in the Ignorance to a greater evolution in the
Knowledge, founded and proceeding in the light of the Superconscient and no
longer in the darkness of the Ignorance and Inconscience.

This terrestrial evolutionary working of Nature from Matter to
Mind and beyond it has a double process: there is an outward visible
process of physical evolution with birth as its machinery, — for each
evolved form of body housing its own evolved power of consciousness is
maintained and kept in continuity by heredity; there is, at the same
time, an invisible process of soul evolution with rebirth into
ascending grades of form and consciousness as its machinery. The first
by itself would mean only a cosmic evolution; for the individual would
be a quickly perishing instrument, and the race, a more abiding
collective formulation, would be the real step in the progressive
manifestation of the cosmic Inhabitant, the universal Spirit: rebirth
is an indispensable condition for any long duration and evolution of
the individual being in the earth-existence. Each grade of cosmic
manifestation, each type of form that can house the indwelling Spirit,
is turned by rebirth into a means for the individual soul, the psychic
entity, to manifest more and more of its concealed consciousness; each
life becomes a step in a victory over Matter by a greater progression
of consciousness in it which shall make eventually Matter itself a
means for the full manifestation of the Spirit.

But this account of the process and meaning of the terrestrial
creation is at every point exposed to challenge in the mind of man
himself, because the evolution is still half-way on its journey, is
still in the Ignorance, is still seeking in the mind of a half-evolved
humanity for its own purpose and significance. It is possible to
challenge the theory of evolution on the ground that it is
insufficiently founded and that it is superfluous as an explanation of
the process of terrestrial existence. It is open to doubt, even if
evolution is granted, whether man has the capacity to develop into a
higher evolutionary being. It is open also to doubt whether the
evolution is likely to go any farther than it has gone already or
whether a supramental evolution, the appearance of a consummated
Truth-Consciousness, a being of Knowledge, is at all probable in the
fundamental Ignorance of the earthly Nature. Another construction
neither teleological nor evolutionary can be put on the workings of
the Spirit in the manifestation here, and it may be as well before
proceeding farther to formulate succinctly the line of thinking which
makes such a construction possible.

Admitting that the creation is a manifestation of the Timeless
Eternal in a Time Eternity, admitting that there are the seven grades
of Consciousness and that the material Inconscience has been laid down
as a basis for the reascent of the Spirit, admitting that rebirth is a
fact, a part of the terrestrial order, still a spiritual evolution of
the individual being is not an inevitable consequence of any of these
admissions or even of all of them together. It is possible to take
another view of the spiritual significance and the inner process of
terrestrial existence. If each thing created is a form of the manifest
Divine Existence, each is divine in itself by the spiritual presence
within it, whatever its appearance, its figure or character in
Nature. In each form of manifestation the Divine takes the delight of
existence and there is no need of change or progress within it.
Whatever ordered display or hierarchy of actualised possibilities is
necessitated by the nature of the Infinite Being, is sufficiently
provided for by the numberless variation, the teeming multitude of
forms, types of consciousness, natures that we see everywhere around
us. There is no teleological purpose in creation and there cannot be,
for all is there in the Infinite: the Divine has nothing that he needs
to gain or that he has not; if there is creation and manifestation, it
is for the delight of creation, of manifestation, not for any
purpose. There is then no reason for an evolutionary movement with a
culmination to be reached or an aim to be worked out and effectuated
or a drive towards ultimate perfection.

In fact we see that the principles of creation are permanent and
unchanging: each type of being remains itself and does not try nor has
any need to become other than itself; granting that some types of
existence disappear and others come into being, it is because the
Consciousness-Force in the universe withdraws its life-delight from
those that perish and turns to create others for its pleasure. But
each type of life, while it lasts, has its own pattern and remains
faithful with whatever minor variations to that pattern: it is bound
to its own consciousness and cannot get away from it into
other-consciousness; limited by its own nature, it cannot transgress
these boundaries and pass into other-nature. If the
Consciousness-Force of the Infinite has manifested Life after
manifesting Matter and Mind after manifesting Life, it does not follow
that it will proceed to manifest Supermind as the next terrestrial
creation. For Mind and Supermind belong to quite different
hemispheres, Mind to the lower status of the Ignorance, Supermind to
the higher status of the Divine Knowledge. This world is a world of
the Ignorance and intended to be that only; there need be no intention
to bring down the powers of the higher hemisphere into the lower half
of existence or to manifest their concealed presence there; for, if
they are at all existent here, it is in an occult incommunicable
immanence and only to maintain the creation, not to perfect it. Man is
the summit of this ignorant creation; he has reached the utmost
consciousness and knowledge of which it is capable: if he tries to go
farther, he will only revolve in larger cycles of his own
mentality. For that is the curve of his existence here, a finite
circling which carries the Mind in its revolutions and returns always
to the point from which it started; Mind cannot go outside its own
cycle, — all idea of a straight line of movement or of progress
reaching infinitely upward or sidewise into the Infinite is a
delusion. If the soul of man is to go beyond humanity, to reach either
a supramental or a still higher status, it must pass out of this
cosmic existence, either to a plane or world of Bliss and Knowledge or
into the unmanifest Eternal and Infinite.

It is true that Science now affirms an evolutionary terrestrial
existence: but if the facts with which Science deals are reliable, the
generalisations it hazards are short-lived; it holds them for some
decades or some centuries, then passes to another generalisation,
another theory of things. This happens even in physical Science where
the facts are solidly ascertainable and verifiable by experiment: in
psychology, — which is relevant here, for the evolution of
consciousness comes into the picture, — its instability is still
greater; it passes there from one theory to another before the first
is well-founded; indeed, several conflicting theories hold the field
together. No firm metaphysical building can be erected upon these
shifting quicksands. Heredity, upon which Science builds its concept
of life-evolution, is certainly a power, a machinery for keeping a
type of species in unchanged being: the demonstration that it is also
an instrument for persistent and progressive variation is very
questionable; its tendency is conservative rather than evolutionary,
– it seems to accept with difficulty the new character that the
Life-Force attempts to force upon it. All the facts show that a type
can vary within its own specification of nature, but there is nothing
to show that it can go beyond it. It has not yet been really
established that ape-kind developed into man; for it would rather seem
that a type resembling the ape, but always characteristic of itself
and not of apehood, developed within its own tendencies of nature and
became what we know as man, the present human being. It is not even
established that inferior races of man developed out of themselves the
superior races; those of an inferior organisation and capacity
perished, but it has not been shown that they left behind the human
races of today as their descendants: but still such a development
within the type is imaginable. The progress of Nature from Matter to
Life, from Life to Mind, may be conceded: but there is no proof yet
that Matter developed into Life or Life-energy into Mind-energy; all
that can be conceded is that Life has manifested in Matter, Mind in
living Matter. For there is no sufficient proof that any vegetable
species developed into an animal existence or that any organisation of
inanimate Matter developed into a living organism. Even if it be
discovered hereafter that under certain chemical or other conditions
Life makes its appearance, all that will be established by this
coincidence is that in certain physical circumstances Life manifests,
not that certain chemical conditions are constituents of Life, are its
elements or are the evolutionary cause of a transformation of
inanimate into animate Matter. Here as elsewhere each grade of being
exists in itself and by itself, is manifested according to its own
character by its own proper energy, and the gradations above or below
it are not origins and resultant sequences but only degrees in the
continuous scale of earth-nature.

If it be asked, how then did all these various gradations and
types of being come into existence, it can be answered that,
fundamentally, they were manifested in Matter by the
Consciousness-Force in it, by the power of the Real-Idea building its
own significant forms and types for the indwelling Spirit’s cosmic
existence: the practical or physical method might vary considerably in
different grades or stages, although a basic similarity of line may be
visible; the creative Power might use not one but many processes or
set many forces to act together. In Matter the process is a creation
of infinitesimals charged with an immense energy, their association by
design and number, the manifestation of larger infinitesimals on that
primary basis, the grouping and association of these together to found
the appearance of sensible objects, earth, water, minerals, metals,
the whole material kingdom. In Life also the Consciousness-Force
begins with infinitesimal forms of vegetable life and infinitesimal
animalcules; it creates an original plasm and multiplies it, creates
the living cell as a unit, creates other kinds of minute biological
apparatus like the seed or the gene, uses always the same method of
grouping and association so as to build by a various operation various
living organisms. A constant creation of types is visible, but that is
no indubitable proof of evolution. The types are sometimes distant
from each other, sometimes closely similar, sometimes identical in
basis but different in detail; all are patterns, and such a variation
in patterns with an identical rudimentary basis for all is the sign of
a conscious Force playing with its own Idea and developing by it all
kinds of possibilities of creation. Animal species in coming into
birth may begin with a like rudimentary embryonic or fundamental
pattern for all, it may follow out up to a stage certain similarities
of development on some or all of its lines; there may too be species
that are twy-natured, amphibious, intermediate between one type and
another: but all this need not mean that the types developed one from
another in an evolutionary series. Other forces than hereditary
variation have been at work in bringing about the appearance of new
characteristics; there are physical forces such as food, light-rays
and others that we are only beginning to know, there are surely others
which we do not yet know; there are at work invisible life-forces and
obscure psychological forces. For these subtler powers have to be
admitted even in the physical evolutionary theory to account for
natural selection; if the occult or subconscious energy in some types
answers to the need of the environment, in others remains unresponsive
and unable to survive, this is clearly the sign of a varying
life-energy and psychology, of a consciousness and a force other than
the physical at work making for variation in Nature. The problem of
the method of operation is still too full of obscure and unknown
factors for any at present possible structure of theory to be
definitive.

Man is a type among many types so constructed, one pattern among
the multitude of patterns in the manifestation in Matter. He is the
most complex that has been created, the richest in content of
consciousness and the curious ingeniousness of his building; he is the
head of the earthly creation, but he does not exceed it. Even as
others, so he too has his own native law, limits, special kind of
existence, svabhava, svadharma; within those limits he
can extend and develop, but he cannot go outside them. If there is a
perfection to which he has to arrive, it must be a perfection in his
own kind, within his own law of being, — the full play of it, but by
observation of its mode and measure, not by transcendence. To exceed
himself, to grow into the superman, to put on the nature and
capacities of a god would be a contradiction of his self-law,
impracticable and impossible. Each form and way of being has its own
appropriate way of the delight of being; to seek through the mind the
mastery and use and enjoyment of the environment of which he is
capable is rightly man the mental being’s objective: but to look
beyond, to run after an ulterior object or aim of existence, to aspire
to surpass the mental stature is to bring in a teleological element
into existence which is not visible in the cosmic structure. If a
supramental being is to appear in the terrestrial creation, it must be
a new and independent manifestation; just as Life and Mind have
manifested in Matter, so Supermind must manifest there and the secret
Conscious-Energy must create the necessary patterns for this new grade
of its potencies. But there is no sign of any such intention in the
operations of Nature.

But if a superior creation is intended, then, certainly, it is not out
of man that the new grade, type or pattern can develop; for in that
case there would be some race or kind or make of human beings that has
already the material of the superman in it, just as the peculiar
animal being that developed into humanity had the essential elements
of human nature already potential or present in it: there is no such
race, kind or type, at most there are only spiritualised mental beings
who are seeking to escape out of the terrestrial creation. If by any
occult law of Nature such a human development of the supramental being
is intended, it could only be by a few in humanity detaching
themselves from the race so as to become a first foundation for this

new pattern of being. There is no reason to suppose that the whole

race could develop this perfection; it cannot be a possibility

generalised in the human creature.

Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Four, “Man and the Evolution” (Part 2 of 3)

If indeed man has evolved in Nature out of the animal, yet now
we see that no other animal type shows any signs of an evolution
beyond itself; if then there was this evolutionary stress in the
animal kingdom, it must have sunk back into quiescence as soon as the
object was fulfilled by man’s appearance: so too if there is any such
stress for a new step in evolution, for self-exceeding, it is likely
to subside into quiescence as soon as its object is fulfilled by the
supramental being’s appearance. But there is no such stress in
reality: the idea of human progress itself is very probably an
illusion, for there is no sign that man, once emerged from the animal
stage, has radically progressed during his race-history; at most he
has advanced in knowledge of the physical world, in Science, in the
handling of his surroundings, in his purely external and utilitarian
use of the secret laws of Nature. But otherwise he is what he always
was in the early beginnings of civilisation: he continues to manifest
the same capacities, the same qualities and defects, the same efforts,
blunders, achievements, frustrations. If progress there has been, it
is in a circle, at most perhaps in a widening circle. Man today is not
wiser than the ancient seers and sages and thinkers, not more
spiritual than the great seekers of old, the first mighty mystics, not
superior in arts and crafts to the ancient artists and craftsmen; the
old races that have disappeared showed as potent an intrinsic
originality, invention, capacity of dealing with life and, if modern
man in this respect has gone a little farther, not by any essential
progress but in degree, scope, abundance, it is because he has
inherited the achievements of his forerunners. Nothing warrants the
idea that he will ever hew his way out of the half-knowledge
half-ignorance which is the stamp of his kind, or, even if he develops
a higher knowledge, that he can break out of the utmost boundary of
the mental circle.

It is tempting and not illogical to regard rebirth as the
potential means of a spiritual evolution, the factor that makes it
possible, but still it is not certain, granting rebirth to be a fact,
that this is its significance. All the ancient theories about
reincarnation supposed it to be a constant transmigration of the soul
from animal to human, but also from human to animal bodies: the Indian
idea added the explanation of Karma, of a return for good or evil
done, of a result of past will and effort; but there was no suggestion
of a progressive evolution from type to higher type, still less of
birth into a kind of being that has never yet existed but has still to
evolve in the future. If evolution there is, then man is the last
stage, because through him there can be the rejection of terrestrial
or embodied life and an escape into some heaven or Nirvana. That was
the end envisaged by the ancient theories and, since this is
fundamentally and unchangeably a world of Ignorance, — even if all
cosmic existence is not in its nature a state of Ignorance, — that
escape is likely to be the true end of the cycle.

This is a line of reasoning that has a considerable cogency and
importance, and it was necessary to state it, even if too briefly for
its importance, in order to meet it. For although some of its
propositions are valid, its view of things is not complete and its
cogency is not conclusive. And first we may without much difficulty
get rid of the objection to the teleological element which the idea of
a predetermined evolution from inconscience to superconscience, the
development of a rising order of beings with a culminating transition
from the life of the Ignorance to a life in the Knowledge, brings into
the structure of the terrestrial existence. The objection to a
teleological cosmos can be based on two very different grounds, — a
scientific reasoning proceeding on the assumption that all is the work
of an inconscient Energy which acts automatically by mechanical
processes and can have no element of purpose in it, and a metaphysical
reasoning which proceeds on the perception that the Infinite and
Universal has everything in it already, that it cannot have something
unaccomplished to accomplish, something to add to itself, to work out,
to realise, and there can therefore be in it no element of progress,
no original or emergent purpose.

The scientific or materialist objection cannot maintain its
validity if there is a secret Consciousness in or behind the
apparently inconscient Energy in Matter. Even in the Inconscient there
seems to be at least an urge of inherent necessity producing the
evolution of forms and in the forms a developing Consciousness, and it
may well be held that this urge is the evolutionary will of a secret
Conscious-Being and its push of progressive manifestation the evidence
of an innate intention in the evolution. This is a teleological
element and it is not irrational to admit it: for the conscious or
even the inconscient nisus arises from a truth of conscious-being that
has become dynamic and set out to fulfil itself in an automatic
process of material Nature; the teleology, the element of purpose in
the nisus is the translation of self-operative Truth of Being into
terms of self-effective Will-Power of that Being, and, if
consciousness is there, such a Will-Power must also be there and the
translation is normal and inevitable. Truth of Being inevitably
fulfilling itself would be the fundamental fact of the evolution, but
Will and its purpose must be there as part of the instrumentation, as
an element in the operative principle.

The metaphysical objection is more serious; for it seems
self-evident that the Absolute can have no purpose in manifestation
except the delight of manifestation itself: an evolutionary movement
in Matter as part of the manifestation must fall within this universal
statement; it can be there only for the delight of the unfolding, the
progressive execution, the objectless seried self-revelation. A
universal totality may also be considered as something complete in
itself; as a totality, it has nothing to gain or to add to its
fullness of being. But here the material world is not an integral
totality, it is part of a whole, a grade in a gradation; it may admit
in it, therefore, not only the presence of undeveloped immaterial
principles or powers belonging to the whole that are involved within
its Matter, but also a descent into it of the same powers from the
higher gradations of the system to deliver their kindred movements
here from the strictness of a material limitation. A manifestation of
the greater powers of Existence till the whole being itself is
manifest in the material world in the terms of a higher, a spiritual
creation, may be considered as the teleology of the evolution. This
teleology does not bring in any factor that does not belong to the
totality; it proposes only the realisation of the totality in the
part. There can be no objection to the admission of a teleological
factor in a part movement of the universal totality, if the purpose,
– not a purpose in the human sense, but the urge of an intrinsic
Truth-necessity conscious in the will of the indwelling Spirit, — is
the perfect manifestation there of all the possibilities inherent in
the total movement. All exists here, no doubt, for the delight of
existence, all is a game or Lila; but a game too carries within itself
an object to be accomplished and without the fulfilment of that object
would have no completeness of significance. A drama without denouement
may be an artistic possibility, — existing only for the pleasure of
watching the characters and the pleasure in problems posed without a
solution or with a forever suspended dubious balance of solution; the
drama of the earth evolution might conceivably be of that character,
but an intended or inherently predetermined denouement is also and
more convincingly possible. Ananda is the secret principle of all
being and the support of all activity of being: but Ananda does not
exclude a delight in the working out of a Truth inherent in being,
immanent in the Force or Will of being, upheld in the hidden
self-awareness of its Consciousness-Force which is the dynamic and
executive agent of all its activities and the knower of their
significance.

A theory of spiritual evolution is not identical with a
scientific theory of form-evolution and physical life-evolution; it
must stand on its own inherent justification: it may accept the
scientific account of physical evolution as a support or an element,
but the support is not indispensable. The scientific theory is
concerned only with the outward and visible machinery and process,
with the detail of Nature’s execution, with the physical development
of things in Matter and the law of development of Life and Mind in
Matter; its account of the process may have to be considerably changed
or may be dropped altogether in the light of new discovery, but that
will not affect the self-evident fact of a spiritual evolution, an
evolution of Consciousness, a progression of the soul’s manifestation
in material existence. In its outward aspects this is what the theory
of evolution comes to, — there is in the scale of terrestrial
existence a development of forms, of bodies, a progressively complex
and competent organisation of Matter, of Life in Matter, of
Consciousness in living Matter; in this scale, the better organised
the form, the more it is capable of housing a better organised, a more
complex and capable, a more developed or evolved Life and
Consciousness. Once the evolutionary hypothesis is put forward and the
facts supporting it are marshalled, this aspect of the terrestrial
existence becomes so striking as to appear indisputable. The precise
machinery by which this is done or the exact genealogy or
chronological succession of types of being is a secondary, though in
itself an interesting and important question; the development of one
form of life out of a precedent less evolved form, natural selection,
the struggle for life, the survival of acquired characteristics may or
may not be accepted, but the fact of a successive creation with a
developing plan in it is the one conclusion which is of primary
consequence. Another self-evident conclusion is that there is a
graduated necessary succession in the evolution, first the evolution
of Matter, next the evolution of Life in Matter, then the evolution of
Mind in living Matter, and in this last stage an animal evolution
followed by a human evolution. The first three terms of the succession
are too evident to be disputable. It may be debated whether there was
a succession of man to animal or a simultaneous initial development,
man outstripping the animal in Mind-evolution; a theory has even been
put forward that man was not the last, but the first and eldest of the
animal species. This priority of man is an ancient conception, but it
was not universal; it is born of the sense of the clear supremacy of
man among earthly creatures, the dignity of this supremacy seeming to
demand a priority of birth: but in evolutionary fact the superior is
not prior but posterior in appearance, the less developed precedes the
more developed and prepares it.

In fact, the idea of the priority of the lower forms of Life is
not altogether absent in ancient thinking. Apart from mythical
accounts of creation, we find already in ancient and mediaeval thought
in India utterances that favour the priority of the animal over man in
the time succession in a sense that agrees with the modern
evolutionary conception. An Upanishad declares that the Self or
Spirit after deciding on life-creation first formed animal kinds like
the cow and horse, but the gods, — who are in the thought of the
Upanishads powers of Consciousness and powers of Nature, — found them
to be insufficient vehicles, and the Spirit finally created the form
of man which the gods saw to be excellently made and sufficient and
they entered into it for their cosmic functions. This is a clear
parable of the creation of more and more developed forms till one was
found that was capable of housing a developed consciousness. In the
Puranas it is stated that the tamasic animal creation was the first in
time. Tamas is the Indian word for the principle of inertia of
consciousness and force: a consciousness dull and sluggish and
incompetent in its play is said to be tamasic; a force, a Life-energy
that is indolent and limited in its capacity, bound to a narrow range
of instinctive impulses, not developing, not seeking farther, not
urged to a greater kinetic action or a more luminously conscious
action, would be assigned to the same category. The animal, in whom
there is this less developed force of consciousness, is prior in
creation; the more developed human consciousness, in which there is a
greater force of kinetic Mind-energy and light of perception, is a
later creation. The Tantra speaks of a soul fallen from its status
passing through many lacs of births in plant and animal forms before
it can reach the human level and be ready for salvation. Here, again,
there is implied the conception of vegetable and animal life-forms as
the lower steps of a ladder, humanity as the last or culminating
development of the conscious being, the form which the soul has to
inhabit in order to be capable of the spiritual motive and a spiritual
issue out of mentality, life and physicality.This is indeed the normal
conception, and it recommends itself so strongly both to reason and
intuition that it hardly needs debate, — the conclusion is almost
unescapable.

It is against this background of a developing evolutionary
process that we have to look at man, his origin and first appearance,
his status in the manifestation. There are here two possibilities;
either there was the sudden appearance of a human body and
consciousness in the earth-nature, an abrupt creation or independent
automatic manifestation of reasoning mentality in the material world
intervening upon a previous similar manifestation of subconscious
life-forms and of living conscious bodies in Matter, or else there was
an evolution of humanity out of animal being, slow perhaps in its
preparation and in its stages of development, but with strong leaps of
change at the decisive points of the transition. The latter theory
offers no difficulty: for it is certain that changes of
characteristics in the type, though not of the fundamental type
itself, can be brought about in species or genus, — indeed this has
already been done by man himself and its possibilities are being
strikingly worked out on a small scale by experimental Science, — and
it may fairly be assumed that the secretly conscious Energy in Nature
could effect large-scale operations of the kind and bring about
considerable and decisive developments by means of its own creative
conventions. The necessary condition for the change from the normal
animal to the human character of existence would be a development of
the physical organisation which would capacitate a rapid progression,
a reversal or turnover of the consciousness, a reaching to a new
height and a looking down from it at the lower stages, a heightening
and widening of capacity which would enable the being to take up the
old animal faculties with a larger and more plastic, a human
intelligence, and at the same time or later to develop greater and
subtler powers proper to the new type of being, powers of reason,
reflection, complex observation, organised invention, thought and
discovery. If there is an emergent Consciousness-Force, there would be
no difficulty in the transition, the instrument being provided, except
the difficulty of the obstruction and resistance of the material
Inconscience. The animal has already some of the corresponding
qualities on a limited scale, for action only, in a rudimentary
organisation crude and simple, with a very inferior scope and
plasticity, a narrower and more casual command of the faculty; but
especially the working of these faculties is more mechanical, less
deliberate, marked with the character of an automatism of
Nature-Energy driving an operation of primitive consciousness and not,
as in man, of a conscious Energy observing and to a great extent
directing and governing and deliberately changing or modifying its own
operations. Other animal habits of consciousness are not fundamentally
different from man’s; all he had to do was to develop and enlarge them
on a higher mental level and wherever possible, to mentalise, refine,
subtilise, — in brief, to bring to them the enlightenment of his new
understanding and intellectual capacity and a power of reasoned
control denied to the animal. This change or reversal once effected,
the power of the human mind to work upon itself and things, create,
know, speculate, would develop in the course of his evolution, even
if, as is conceivable, they were at the beginning small in scope,
nearer to the animal, still comparatively simple and crude in their
action. Such a reversal has been made in each radical transition of
Nature: Life-Force emerging turns upon Matter, imposes a vital content
on the operations of material Energy while it develops also its own
new movements and operations; Life-Mind emerges in Life-Force and
Matter and imposes its content of consciousness on their operations
while it develops also its own action and faculties; a new greater
emergence and reversal, the emergence of humanity, is in line with
Nature’s precedents; it would be a new application of the general
principle.

Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Four, “Man and the Evolution” (Part 3 of 3)

This theory is therefore easy to accept: its working is intelligible.
But the other hypothesis presents considerable difficulties. On the side of
consciousness the new manifestation, the human, could be accounted for by an
upsurge of concealed Consciousness from the involution in universal Nature.
But in that case it must have had some material form already existent for
its vehicle of emergence, the vehicle being adapted by the force of the
emergence itself to the needs of a new inner creation; or else a rapid
divergence from previous physical types or patterns may have brought a new
being into existence. But whichever the hypothesis accepted, this means an
evolutionary process, — there is only a difference in the method and
machinery of the divergence or transition. Or there may have been, on the
contrary, not an upsurgence but a descent of mentality from a Mind-plane
above us, perhaps the descent of a soul or mental being into terrestrial
Nature. The difficulty would then be the appearance of the human body, too
complex and difficult an organ to have been suddenly created or manifested;
for such a miraculous speed of process, though quite possible on a
supraphysical plane of being, does not seem to figure among the normal
possibles or potentials of the material Energy. It could only happen there
by an intervention of a supraphysical force or law of Nature or by a
creator Mind acting with full power and directly on Matter. An action of a
supraphysical Force and a creator may be conceded in every new appearance in
Matter; each such appearance is at bottom a miracle operated by a secret
Consciousness supported by a veiled Mind-Energy or Life-Energy: but the
action is nowhere seen to be direct, overt, self-sufficient; it is always
superimposed on an already realised physical basis and acts by an extension
of some established process of Nature. It is more conceivable that there was
an opening of some existing body to a supraphysical influx so that it was
transformed into a new body; but no such event can lightly be assumed to
have taken place in the past history of material Nature: in order to happen
it would seem to need either the conscious intervention of an invisible
mental being to form the body he intended to inhabit or else a previous
development of a mental being in Matter itself who would be already able to
receive a supraphysical power and impose it on the rigid and narrow formulas
of his physical existence. Otherwise we must suppose that there was a
pre-existent body already so much evolved as to be fitted for the reception
of a vast mental influx or capable of a pliable response to the descent into
it of a mental being. But this would suppose a previous evolution of mind in
body to the point at which such a receptivity would be possible. It is quite
conceivable that such an evolution from below and such a descent from above
co-operated in the appearance of humanity in earth-nature. The secret
psychical entity already there in the animal might have itself called down
the mental being, the Mind-Purusha, into the realm of living Matter in order
to take up the vital-mental energy already at work and lift it into a higher
mentality. But this would still be a process of evolution, the higher plane
only intervening to assist the appearance and enlargement of its own
principle in terrestrial Nature.

Next, it may be conceded that each type or pattern of consciousness and
being in the body, once established, has to be faithful to the law of being
of that type, to its own design and rule of nature. But it may also very
well be that part of the law of the human type is its impulse towards
self-exceeding, that the means for a conscious transition has been provided
for among the spiritual powers of man; the possession of such a capacity may
be a part of the plan on which the creative Energy has built him. It may be
conceded that what man has up till now principally done is to act within the
circle of his nature, on a spiral of nature-movement, sometimes descending,
sometimes ascending, — there has been no straight line of progress, no
indisputable, fundamental or radical exceeding of his past nature: what he
has done is to sharpen, subtilise, make a more and more complex and plastic
use of his capacities. It cannot truly be said that there has been no such
thing as human progress since man’s appearance or even in his recent
ascertainable history; for however great the ancients, however supreme some
of their achievements and creations, however impressive their powers of
spirituality, of intellect or of character, there has been in later
developments an increasing subtlety, complexity, manifold development of
knowledge and possibility in man’s achievements, in his politics, society,
life, science, metaphysics, knowledge of all kinds, art, literature; even in
his spiritual endeavour, less surprisingly lofty and less massive in power
of spirituality than that of the ancients, there has been this increasing
subtlety, plasticity, sounding of depths, extension of seeking. There have
been falls from a high type of culture, a sharp temporary descent into a
certain obscurantism, cessations of the spiritual urge, plunges into a
barbaric natural materialism; but these are temporary phenomena, at worst a
downward curve of the spiral of progress. This progress has not indeed
carried the race beyond itself, into a self-exceeding, a transformation of
the mental being. But that was not to be expected; for the action of
evolutionary Nature in a type of being and consciousness is first to develop
the type to its utmost capacity by just such a subtilisation and increasing
complexity till it is ready for her bursting of the shell, the ripened
decisive emergence, reversal, turning over of consciousness on itself that
constitutes a new stage in the evolution. If it be supposed that her next
step is the spiritual and supramental being, the stress of spirituality in
the race may be taken as a sign that that is Nature’s intention, the sign
too of the capacity of man to operate in himself or aid her to operate the
transition. If the appearance in animal being of a type similar in some
respects to the ape-kind but already from the beginning endowed with the
elements of humanity was the method of the human evolution, the appearance
in the human being of a spiritual type resembling mental-animal humanity but
already with the stamp of the spiritual aspiration on it would be the
obvious method of Nature for the evolutionary production of the spiritual
and supramental being.

It is pertinently suggested that if such an evolutionary culmination is
intended and man is to be its medium, it will only be a few especially
evolved human beings who will form the new type and move towards the new
life; that once done, the rest of humanity will sink back from a spiritual
aspiration no longer necessary for Nature’s purpose and remain quiescent in
its normal status. It can equally be reasoned that the human gradation must
be preserved if there is really an ascent of the soul by reincarnation
through the evolutionary degrees towards the spiritual summit; for otherwise
the most necessary of all the intermediate steps will be lacking. It must be
conceded at once that there is not the least probability or possibility of
the whole human race rising in a block to the supramental level; what is
suggested is nothing so revolutionary and astonishing, but only the
capacity in the human mentality, when it has reached a certain level or a
certain point of stress of the evolutionary impetus, to press towards a
higher plane of consciousness and its embodiment in the being. The being will
necessarily undergo by this embodiment a change from the normal constitution
of its nature, a change certainly of its mental and emotional and
sensational constitution and also to a great extent of the
body-consciousness and the physical conditioning of our life and energies;
but the change of consciousness will be the chief factor, the initial
movement, the physical modification will be a subordinate factor, a
consequence. This transmutation of the consciousness will always remain
possible to the human being when the flame of the soul, the psychic kindling,
becomes potent in heart and mind and the nature is ready. The spiritual
aspiration is innate in man; for he is, unlike the animal, aware of
imperfection and limitation and feels that there is something to be attained
beyond what he now is: this urge towards self-exceeding is not likely ever
to die out totally in the race. The human mental status will be always
there, but it will be there not only as a degree in the scale of rebirth,
but as an open step towards the spiritual and supramental status.

It must be observed that the appearance of human mind and body on the
earth marks a crucial step, a decisive change in the course and process of
the evolution; it is not merely a continuation of the old lines. Up till this
advent of a developed thinking mind in Matter evolution had been effected,
not by the self-aware aspiration, intention, will or seeking of the living
being, but subconsciously or subliminally by the automatic operation of
Nature. This was so because the evolution began from the Inconscience and
the secret Consciousness had not emerged sufficiently from it to operate
through the self-aware participating individual will of its living creature.
But in man the necessary change has been made, — the being has become awake
and aware of himself; there has been made manifest in Mind its will to
develop, to grow in knowledge, to deepen the inner and widen the outer
existence, to increase the capacities of the nature. Man has seen that there
can be a higher status of consciousness than his own; the evolutionary
oestrus is there in his parts of mind and life, the aspiration to exceed
himself is delivered and articulate within him: he has become conscious of a
soul, discovered the Self and Spirit. In him, then, the substitution of a
conscious for a subconscious evolution has become conceivable and
practicable, and it may well be concluded that the aspiration, the urge, the
persistent endeavour in him is a sure sign of Nature’s will for a higher way
to fulfilment, the emergence of a greater status.

In the previous stages of the evolution Nature’s first care and effort
had to be directed towards a change in the physical organisation, for only
so could there be a change of consciousness; this was a necessity imposed by
the insufficiency of the force of consciousness already in formation to
effect a change in the body. But in man a reversal is possible, indeed
inevitable; for it is through his consciousness, through its transmutation
and no longer through a new bodily organism as a first instrumentation that
the evolution can and must be effected. In the inner reality of things a
change of consciousness was always the major fact, the evolution has always
had a spiritual significance and the physical change was only instrumental;
but this relation was concealed by the first abnormal balance of the two
factors, the body of the external Inconscience outweighing and obscuring in
importance the spiritual element, the conscious being. But once the balance
has been righted, it is no longer the change of body that must precede the
change of consciousness; the consciousness itself by its mutation will
necessitate and operate whatever mutation is needed for the body. It has to
be noted that the human mind has already shown a capacity to aid Nature in
the evolution of new types of plant and animal; it has created new forms of
its environment, developed by knowledge and discipline considerable changes
in its own mentality. It is not an impossibility that man should aid Nature
consciously also in his own spiritual and physical evolution and
transformation. The urge to it is already there and partly effective, though
still incompletely understood and accepted by the surface mentality; but one
day it may understand, go deeper within itself and discover the means, the
secret energy, the intended operation of the Consciousness-Force within
which is the hidden reality of what we call Nature.

All these are conclusions that can be arrived at even from the
observation of the outward phenomena of Nature’s progression, her surface
evolution of being and of consciousness in the physical birth and the body.
But there is the other, the invisible factor; there is rebirth, the progress
of the soul by ascent from grade to grade of the evolving existence, and in
the grades to higher and higher types of bodily and mental instrumentation.
In this progression the psychic entity is still veiled, even in man the
conscious mental being, by its instruments, by mind and life and body; it is
unable to manifest fully, held back from coming to the front where it can
stand out as the master of its nature, obliged to submit to a certain
determination by the instruments, to a domination of Purusha by Prakriti. But
in man the psychic part of the personality is able to develop with a much
greater rapidity than in the inferior creation, and a time can arrive when
the soul-entity is close to the point at which it will emerge from behind
the veil into the open and become the master of its instrumentation in
Nature. But this will mean that the secret indwelling spirit, the Daemon,
the Godhead within is on the point of emergence; and, when it emerges, it
can hardly be doubted that its demand will be, as indeed it already is in
the Mind itself when it undergoes the inner psychic influence, for a
diviner, a more spiritual existence. In the nature of the earth-life where
the Mind is an instrument of the Ignorance, this can only be effected by a
change of consciousness, a transition from a foundation in Ignorance to a
foundation in Knowledge, from the mental to a supramental consciousness, a
supramental instrumentation of Nature.

There is no conclusive validity in the reasoning that because this is
a world of Ignorance, such a transformation can only be achieved by a
passage to a heaven beyond or cannot be achieved at all and the demand of
the psychic entity is itself ignorant and must be replaced by a merger of
the soul in the Absolute. This conclusion could only be solely valid if
Ignorance were the whole meaning, substance and power of the
world-manifestation or if there were no element in World-Nature itself
through which there could be an exceeding of the ignorant mentality that
still burdens our present status of being. But the Ignorance is only a
portion of this World-Nature; it is not the whole of it, not the original
power or creator: it is in its higher origin a self-limiting Knowledge and
even in its lower origin, its emergence out of the sheer material
Inconscience, it is a suppressed Consciousness labouring to find, to recover
itself, to manifest Knowledge, which is its true character, as the
foundation of existence. In universal Mind itself there are ranges above our
mentality which are instruments of the cosmic truth-cognition, and into
these the mental being can surely rise; for already it rises towards them in
supernormal conditions or receives from them without yet knowing or
possessing them intuitions, spiritual intimations, large influxes of
illumination or spiritual capacity. All these ranges are conscious of what is
beyond them, and the highest of them is directly open to the Supermind,
aware of the Truth-Consciousness which exceeds it. Moreover, in the evolving
being itself, those greater powers of consciousness are here, supporting
Mind-truth, underlying its action which screens them; this Supermind and
those Truth-powers uphold Nature by their secret presence: even, truth of
Mind is their result, a diminished operation, a representation in partial
figures. It is, therefore, not only natural but seems inevitable that these
higher powers of Existence should manifest here in Mind as Mind itself has
manifested in Life and Matter.

Man’s urge towards spirituality is the inner driving of the spirit
within him towards emergence, the insistence of the Consciousness-Force of
the being towards the next step of its manifestation. It is true that the
spiritual urge has been largely other-worldly or turned at its extreme
towards a spiritual negation and self-annihilation of the mental individual;
but this is only one side of its tendency maintained and made dominant by
the necessity of passing out of the kingdom of the fundamental Inconscience,
overcoming the obstacle of the body, casting away the obscure vital, getting
rid of the ignorant mentality, the necessity to attain first and foremost,
by a rejection of all these impediments to spiritual being, to a spiritual
status. The other, the dynamic side of the spiritual urge has not been
absent, — the aspiration to a spiritual mastery and mutation of Nature, to
a spiritual perfection of the being, a divinisation of the mind, the heart
and the very body: there has even been the dream or a psychic prevision of a
fulfilment exceeding the individual transformation, a new earth and heaven, a
city of God, a divine descent upon earth, a reign of the spiritually
perfect, a kingdom of God not only within us but outside, in a collective
human life. However obscure may have been some of the forms taken by this
aspiration, the indication they contain of the urge of the occult spiritual
being within to emergence in earth-nature is unmistakable.

If a spiritual unfolding on earth is the hidden truth of our birth
into Matter, if it is fundamentally an evolution of consciousness that has
been taking place in Nature, then man as he is cannot be the last term of
that evolution: he is too imperfect an expression of the Spirit, Mind itself
a too limited form and instrumentation; Mind is only a middle term of
consciousness, the mental being can only be a transitional being. If, then,
man is incapable of exceeding mentality, he must be surpassed and Supermind
and superman must manifest and take the lead of the creation. But if his
mind is capable of opening to what exceeds it, then there is no reason why
man himself should not arrive at Supermind and supermanhood or at least lend
his mentality, life and body to an evolution of that greater term of the
Spirit manifesting in Nature.

Click to continue reading: THE LIFE DIVINE, by Sri Aurobindo: Book Two, Chap. 24, “The Evolution of the Spiritual Man, Part 1 of 5″
Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Four, “Man and the Evolution” (Part 3 of 3)


Sri Aurobindo’s Vision and the 20th Century by Rod Hemsell

Sri Aurobindo’s Vision and the 20th Century

Physics and the Philosophy of Evolution

Nature’s Dialectic

Few among humanity have yet undertaken the challenge, availed the opportunity, transcended their conventional mental formulas, and achieved the clarity of intention necessary to see the vision of Sri Aurobindo. Fewer have gone so far as to integrate his vision into their thought and life, and so to understand it fully, to grasp its historical significance, and to realize its force, its evolutionary potential. Therefore it can truly be said that Sri Aurobindo belongs to the future.1 And yet his vision, and the thought forms and literary expressions that he created to embody it, are vibrant within the epoch of human achievement known as the 20th Century – that moment in time and the history of civilization that can be understood as the culmination of the rational cycle of human development and the beginning of a suprarational, integral cycle – like a subtle ether flowing through everything.

Abundant are the signs of that evolutionary transition of which he was the harbinger, indications of the integral and supramental structures of consciousness that he said would emerge. But the emergence of creative thought formations, and of new evolutionary forms, takes time. And very little is known about this process of emergence in any case. It is not common knowledge, and it is not the way we have been conditioned to understand how evolution happens. The signs, nevertheless, are most evident in the subtler, more spiritual thought of the century, but clearly perceptible also in the arts and literature, and in the human sciences – philosophy, psychology, sociology. They are progressively apparent in the startling theoretical discoveries of the natural sciences, in physics, evolutionary biology, ecology. But there, in the mental disciplines, the fundamental aporias and enigmas of thought that permeate the epoch are still, as always, the questions of man, of consciousness, of our ability, or inability, to know and conquer our human limitations. The new has not yet emerged, but its emergence is presaged by new perspectives, flashes, intensities, forebodings, and irrepressible facts, and by the failure and breakdown of old structures.

In an epoch of incomparable human cruelty, depravity and destruction, paired with almost miraculous advances in the products and processes of global technological civilization, when the human has become godlike in its mastery of nature, humanity is being forced, at last perhaps, to seek hope shrouded in its most desperate moment of deficient self-revelations, and the self-realization of its shadow identity as creator of the culture of nihilism and extinction.^2  It is perhaps inevitable, then, that we rewrite Sri Aurobindo, that we revision and rethink his vision as the background of  this passing age of scientific and technological hubris, and that we narrate the necessary emergence of the trans-human. For, as he saw and wrote in the first few pages of his massive literary life-work, early in the century:

“…today we see a humanity satiated but not satisfied by victorious analysis of the externalities of Nature preparing to return to its primeval longings. …to convert our twilit or obscure physical mentality into the plenary supramental illumination, to build peace and a self-existent bliss where there is only a stress of transitory satisfactions besieged by pain and emotional suffering, to establish infinite freedom in a world which presents itself as a group of mechanical necessities…
“… all Nature seeks a harmony, life and matter in their own sphere as much as mind in the arrangement of its perceptions. The greater the apparent disorder of the materials offered or the apparent disparateness, even to irreconcilable opposition, of the elements that have to be utilized, the stronger is the spur, and it drives towards a more subtle and puissant order than can normally be the result of a less difficult endeavour.^3

But the dialectic of progress that evolutionary Nature utilizes to achieve her ends is a difficult lesson for us; it is one that we would in fact prefer to ignore. Or, perhaps it is because of our ignorance and unwillingness to learn, that she chooses to use this method. However that may be, it is by negation that she affirms and by destruction that she creates, as Sri Aurobindo stated unequivocally in those first pages, in 1914:

In our world error is continually the handmaid and pathfinder of Truth; for error is  really a half-truth that stumbles because of its limitations; often it is Truth that wears a disguise in order to arrive unobserved near to its goal.^4
The world today presents the aspect of a huge cauldron of Medea in which all things are being cast, shredded into pieces, experimented on, combined and recombined either to perish and provide the scattered material of new forms or to emerge rejuvenated and changed for a fresh term of existence. …For the march of Nature is not drilled to a regular and mechanical forward stepping. She reaches constantly beyond herself even at the cost of subsequent deplorable retreats. …And these self-exceedings are the revelation of that in her which is most divine or else most diabolical, but in either case the most puissant to bring her rapidly forward towards her goal.^5

The First World War was then upon us, soon to be followed by the Holocaust and Hiroshima. These were followed, in turn, by the liberation of many new nations formerly subjugated by Colonialism, and the ascendancy of the civilization of affluence, with Germany and Japan, ironically, near the top. It appears that the will to power evolved rapidly in these cases, from a lower, infrahuman and destructive form into a form of creativity, efficiency and excellence. Perhaps a reverse paradox might be represented historically by the invention and widespread use of antibiotics during and after World War II, followed by the exponential increase of the human population from 2.5 billion in 1950 to over 6 billion in 2000. (It had already almost doubled from 1.6 billion at the turn of the century, largely in response to the spread of mechanized agriculture.) If, as a result of the population explosion, pollution, global warming, and the depletion of natural resources this “progress” were to bring an end, or a rapid decline, to our species, we might see a parallel with the end of the age of the dinosaurs, which apparently made room for the rise of primates just a few million years later. This pattern of reversals would apparently illustrate and be the justification for what Sri Aurobindo terms, poetically, Nature’s harsh economy, and yet the indication of a process of change that is neither random nor arbitrary, but is rather characterized by order and purpose.  It is one in which Nature sets up the oppositions necessary to create the circumstances, structures, conditions for the emergence of that next stage of development, without which her processes could not continue to evolve. Therefore it might be said, to reaffirm the theoretical insights of critical thought with Sri Aurobindo’s more holistic, spiritual vision: if the apparent oppositions are terms of Nature’s intentional process, there are in fact no oppositions.

Could it perhaps then be said, that the extraordinary developments of scientific thought, knowledge, and technology in the 20th Century have set the stage for the further evolution of consciousness, not so much by what they have accomplished for humanity and the Earth, but rather by having created the possibility of such catastrophic circumstances that survival can only be achieved by overcoming and transcending this “intelligent human” with his righteous violence? Such speculation is at least not out of place in the context of the English literary traditions of Blake and Huxley to which Sri Aurobindo’s prophetic writing might also be said to belong.

Uncertainty and Complementarity

In 1914, Sri Aurobindo wrote, in the context of his speculations about the development of scientific thought, “It will be evident that essential Matter is a thing non-existent to the senses and only… a conceptual form of substance; and in fact the point is increasingly reached where only an arbitrary distinction in thought divides form of substance from form of energy.”^6 He was making a comparison between the truths of the ancient Vedic knowledge and the new discoveries of modern science, for the purpose of illustrating a possible trend of the latter towards “a Monism which is consistent with multiplicity, towards the Vedic idea of the one essence with its many becomings.”^7 And then, within a few short paragraphs, he formulated the integral knowledge, towards which science only  now, at the beginning of the next century, tentatively begins to move: “Life…begins to reveal itself as an obscure energy of sensibility imprisoned in its material formulation; and when the dividing ignorance is cured which gives us the sense of a gulf between Life and Matter, it is difficult to suppose that Mind, Life and Matter will be found to be anything else than one Energy triply formulated, the triple world of the Vedic seers. Nor will the conception then be able to endure of a brute material Force as the mother of Mind.”^8 As we shall see, this understanding is still a step before which scientific thought hesitates. And the one beyond, the final destined leap, it does not yet dare to think: “The Energy that creates the world can be nothing else than a Will, and Will is only consciousness applying itself to a work and a result.”^9

Einstein had published the special theory of relativity in 1905 and then developed the general theory of relativity in 1915, definitively altering the traditional conceptions of Space and Time. Commenting on the subsequent development of quantum theory in the 1920s, Capra (1982) says, as if to confirm Sri Aurobindo’s prediction, “The most important consequence of the new relativistic framework has been the realization that mass is nothing but a form of energy.”^10 And the Nobel physicist, Ilya Prigogine (1984), currently at the forefront of cosmic evolutionary theory, writes: “Quantum mechanics teaches us that… on all levels reality implies an essential element of conceptualization.”^11

The seminal discoveries of quantum mechanics in that theoretical “golden age” of physics in the 1920s, made by Einstein, Bohr, Planck, Heisenberg, Dirac, Shrodinger, etc., have been described by Hawking (2001) as “a new picture of reality” in which, “No longer did any particles have a definite position and speed. Instead, the more accurately one determined a particle’s position, the less accurately could one determine its speed, and vice versa.”^12 Thus it became uncertain whether matter is something stable and solid or something fluid and in motion. And this “uncertainty principle,” as formulated by Werner Heisenberg, has become perhaps the most often cited, because the most profoundly disturbing, discovery of scientific thought in the Twentieth Century. Let us therefore ask why this should be so, and how it happens to be especially significant in the context of Sri Aurobindo’s evolutionary vision.

The theory of relativity presented a conception of the universe in which Space was not a boundless container lasting through an eternal Time, in which material objects move and change in predictable ways. Rather it replaced this static view of the physical universe, which had been held by scientific and philosophical thought at least since Plato and Aristotle, with the view that space and time are relative dimensions of a universe in which everything is in motion. As Capra puts it: “In such a framework space and time are intimately and inseparably connected and form a four-dimensional continuum called “space-time”. … Physicists have now lived with relativity theory for many years and have become thoroughly familiar with its mathematical formalism. Nevertheless, this has not helped our intuition very much. We have no direct sensory experience of the four-dimensional space-time…”^13

Moreover, with the development of quantum mechanics, which presents a picture that Capra says “clashes with our deepest intuition of reality,” subatomic particles, or quanta of matter-energy, do not really appear to exist except insofar as they are defined by observers. Matter is a conceptual form of energy as Sri Aurobindo said. And according to quantum physics, the behavior of this matter-energy is determined by non-local events, as if the “particle” were spread throughout great expanses of space as a “wave” and the existence and behavior of this energy – of which everything is made – is known only through a mathematics of probability. Thus, the principle of uncertainty, which defines a dynamic world that appears to be, as Heisenberg said, “a complicated tissue of events, in which connections of different kinds alternate or overlap or combine and thereby determine the texture of the whole.”^14 Contrary to the conventional, analytical, and mechanistic paradigm, the part is determined by the whole, rather than the other, common sense, way around.

Hawking, who helped to prove, in the late 60s, that space-time had a beginning with the Big Bang and that the universe is continually expanding and evolving, says that Einstein himself refused to accept these bounded implications of his theory, preferring the classical view of a static, essentially unchanging and eternal universe. And of the implications of quantum theory, Einstein reportedly said, “It was as if the ground had been pulled out from under one, with no firm foundation to be seen anywhere, upon which one could build.”^15

And so, the universe at bottom is not mechanical and not made up of well defined building blocks (atoms, quarks, etc.), with cause and effect relationships that determine the whole in predictable ways, but is rather a whole which determines its parts through an interconnected web of vast energy fields, and this whole appears to be somehow self-determining, and unpredictable by our way of understanding. Several troublesome implications seem to follow. One is that, if the universe is not deterministic and predictable, it must be ultimately random, chaotic, irrational; another is that, if we can neither know nor determine the structures and processes of Nature with certainty, then  we haven’t much reason for hope. It would seem that we are led necessarily to a position of existential nihilism. And in fact, the 20th Century has often been characterized as such an irrational age of nihilism.

However, our mathematical understanding of the physical universe has also led to a very impressive sort of control, extraordinarily effective within certain limits, and we are able to construct quite an orderly “picture” or “concept” of this uncertain “reality.” As Hawking says, the quantum laws of physics have been “the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology, and electronics, and the foundations for the technology that has transformed the world in the last fifty years,”^16 referring of course primarily to digital computer and laser technologies. In addition, the visionary inclinations of many physicists has tended more and more toward the conclusion that the universe is not only orderly and self-determining, but it evolves in ways that tend to produce consciousness. It would seem that Niels Bohr, in formulating the principle of complementarity as a corollary to the uncertainty principle, had given a nod to the idea with which we began: that the contrariness of Nature is quite meaningful in its results. Bohr’s principle suggests that both terms of any empirical duality, such as particle/wave, position/velocity, space/time, structure/process, order/chaos, stability/change should be recognized, measured, and considered holistically as aspects of a unity. Thus the uncertainty principle leads in fact to a more complete and complex grasp of reality.

Evolution and Consciousness

Many scientists, including especially Capra, Prigogine, Penrose and others who have applied the principles of uncertainty and complementarity, analogically and metaphorically as well as computationally perhaps, in the domains of chemistry and biology, have been led to the proposition that apparently stable structures in nature are the product of processes of constant energy transformations at all levels: subatomic, molecular, and biological. According to Prigogine’s theory of dissipative structures, all physical systems, from electromagnetic fields to molecules, weather systems to amino acids, cells and organs to organisms, are self organizing and self replicating as a result of energy flowing through their systems. The structures of physical systems reproduce their own stable forms through constant structural interactions with their environment. Such self-making, self-sustaining structural transformations are on-going within and between organisms, according to this theory, exhibiting patterns of deliberate response and reaction, memory and choice, which are thought to be parallel to and indicative of mental processes, or intelligent behavior.  The ability of organisms to co-exist and co-evolve, through processes of non-local energy field causation, whether at the quantum, biological or mental levels, and at moments of extreme disequilibrium to diversify or evolve new structures and processes of ever greater complexity and viability, are leading some scientists to conclude that the organization of life itself is in fact a kind of mental process.

As Capra puts it in The Web of Life – A new scientific understanding of living systems (1996):

To understand the nature of life from a systemic point of view means to identify a set of criteria by which we can make a clear distinction between living and nonliving systems. …the recent formulations of models of self-organization and the mathematics of complexity indicate that it is now possible to identify such criteria. The key idea of my synthesis is to express those criteria in terms of the three conceptual dimensions, pattern, structure, and process. …I propose to understand autopoiesis, as defined by Maturana and Varela, as the pattern of life; …dissipative structure, as defined by Prigogine, as the structure of living systems; …and cognition, as defined by Gregory Bateson and more fully by Maturana and Varela, as the process of life. …Autopoiesis (self-making) and cognition (process of perceiving and knowing) are two different aspects of the same phenomenon of life. In the new theory all living systems are cognitive systems, and cognition always implies the existence of an autopoietic network.(p.160)

Although these theories are still based on observable physical, chemical, and biological processes, and as such remain materialistic and structural theories, it is clear that the wave-fluctuations of this line of thought, from Heisenberg and Bohr to Capra, Prigogine, and Penrose, approach that knowledge of which Sri Aurobindo spoke, and perhaps herald a time when, as he said, scientific knowledge would reach conclusions similar to those of the Vedas. It seems that matter, life, and mind are in fact beginning to be understood as different formulations of one unknown Energy. But a strong reductionist bias is still evident, even in Capra’s attempts to formulate a synthetic, unified theory of life and mind, and even more so in Hawking’s positivist version of anthropomorphism.^17 Maturana and Varela, two scientists of consciousness whose work forms a substantial part of Capra’s synthetic point of view, state the bias unequivocally: “as scientists we can only deal with unities that are structurally determined.”^18 And in their interpretation of apparently conscious linguistic behavior, they state the qualifying paradigm “to operate in languages is to operate in a domain of congruent, co-ontogenic structural coupling.”^19 What this means is that what the observer perceives and interprets as linguistic behavior in animals is accompanied by a parallel but dissimilar underlying set of nervous and muscular system behaviors characterized as “structural coupling.”  For these scientists, there is ultimately no difference between structural coupling and conscious behavior or “cognition;” the latter is reduced to the former.

The next step that Sri Aurobindo predicted, “at which stage of development the conception of material Force as the mother of Mind would not be able to endure,” has obviously not occurred. If it had, instead of reducing consciousness to structural coupling or an emergent quantum event, there would be the realization that Consciousness was the first principle, from which the structures and processes of the universe proceed, rather than being the penultimate outcome of those physical processes. This next step would make it evident that the reason why stable structures appear to evolve in matter by means of self-determining processes, and why patterns or forms persist without change even though everything of which they are composed is constantly changing, is that there is a Will in them, infinitely diverse and omnipresent, a will of self-manifestation and self-being, and not a merely physical evolutionary dynamism, whether inherently one of chance/necessity or of chaos/order.

This is a form of understanding that is of course more characteristic of philosophy than of science, especially if we look back to the time, in ancient Greece, and perhaps as early as Vedic India, when the distinction between these modes of thought was not yet clearly defined. Aristotle’s works are burdened throughout with the attempt to understand the relationship between form, which is apparently unchanging, and matter, energy, motion, which are the elements of change from potential to actual form. And at that time the distinction was also not being made between form as such, and form as concept derived from perceptions and observations of the material world; the idea that the material world is separate from mind, or consciousness, had not yet intervened in the history of knowledge. For Aristotle, who was a biologist, mind was a form of nature whose activity was to know and understand other forms like itself.  And especially important to the history of knowledge, the idea had also not yet intervened that our measurements of matter, energy, motion – and on a macro level, patterns, structures, processes – tell us what “reality” is. For the ancient thinkers, the world of stable forms and values that we experience, and that the invisible physical micro-world of change upholds, was the reality. This inversion of the known and unknown, and the reduction of form to mechanical forces or subatomic measurements and mathematical probabilities has been precisely the work of modern scientific thinking.

It would be ironic indeed, if as Hawking and others seem to half-seriously suggest, the universe has evolved from an invisible world of Platonic forms to a world of Platonic solids, through the vast infinitude of the forms of cosmic life and mind, just so that physicists could reduce everything to mathematical probabilities, parallel universes, and imaginary dimensions of time. But Hawking’s colleague, Roger Penrose, seems to have reached a considerably more serious point of departure, and one quite pertinent to our present concerns. In his book Shadows of the Mind – A search for the missing science of consciousness (1994), Penrose states:

If Einstein’s general relativity has shown how our very notions of the nature of space and time have had to shift, and become more mysterious and mathematical, then it is quantum mechanics that has shown, to an even greater extent, how our concept of matter has suffered a similar fate.  Not just matter, but our very notions of actuality have become profoundly disturbed. How is it that the mere counterfactual possibility of something happening – a thing which does not actually happen – can have a decisive influence on what actually does happen? There is something in the mystery of the way that quantum mechanics operates that at least seems much closer than is classical physics, to the kind of mystery needed to accommodate mentality within the world of physical reality. I have no doubt myself that when deeper theories are at hand, then the place of mind in relation to physical theory will not seem so incongruous as it does today. (p.419)

Penrose argues in this book that consciousness – which he defines as awareness, understanding, and will or intention – will be explainable when physical science itself evolves its own theories and methods beyond their present limitations, because consciousness is beyond any possibility of computational understanding. And yet he believes that the ground of consciousness will ultimately be found at the interface between the world of quantum effects and the world of biological structures. While still adhering to the reductionism and structuralism characteristic of the scientific paradigm, he is able to foresee the possibility of an entirely knew understanding yet to come: “For physics to be able to accommodate something that is as foreign to our current physical picture as is the phenomenon of consciousness, we must expect a profound change – one that alters the very underpinnings of our philosophical viewpoint as to the nature of reality.”^20

Perhaps what this means is that the next quantum leap in consciousness, one foreseen by Sri Aurobindo as necessary in order to resolve the dilemmas of matter and mind, will be an even more disturbing paradigm shift than the ones already brought about by the new physics of the 20th Century. In Sri Aurobindo’s interpretation of the Vedic cosmology, everything in the universe, from the physical to the mental plane, is an expression of the will-force of consciousness. Therefore it is possible that the non-computational interface between the quantum world and cellular structures theorized by Penrose, which brings about the “objective reduction” of quantum reality to the real-time world of phenomena that we know, is one level where consciousness-will can indeed be found. Penrose’s intuition is that the phenomenon of objective reduction will be related to gravity; though the phenomenon must be a Force, it is likely to be one that is as yet unknown to science. To observe this phenomenon will require a movement of consciousness toward such an understanding, which is not currently a movement characteristic of science. At the beginning of his discussion of this possibility of scientific knowledge, Sri Aurobindo said, “If modern Materialism were simply an unintelligent acquiescence in the material life, the advance might be indefinitely delayed. But since its very soul is the search for Knowledge, it will be unable to cry a halt; as it reaches the barriers of sense knowledge and of the reasoning from sense knowledge, its very rush will carry it beyond and the rapidity and sureness with which it has embraced the visible universe is only an earnest in the conquest of what lies beyond, once the stride is taken that crosses the barrier.”^21

The “stride” that Sri Aurobindo hints at here, and which he refers to in the same context as being “attainable by a supreme effort of consciousness” but also as “escaping the grasp of our thought and speech, instruments which proceed always by the sense of difference and express by the way of definition” implies another methodology than the one normally employed by science, which is always based on observation of the external world, on “sense-knowledge”, and on reasoning from that knowledge, even if it is sometimes accompanied by a more global phenomenon of inspired seeing. The proposed methodology entails a process often referred to by Sri Aurobindo as a transformation of consciousness.  Vedic knowledge apparently used that method and was of that type. But it was at the same time not “other worldly.” It was, however, “spiritual knowledge” achieved by a supra-mental consciousness which can could know the world from within. It is knowledge of the Self, which is one with everything in time and space because everything is essentially That. This is obviously a rather mystical view of things, and yet the philosophy of evolution proposed by Sri Aurobindo, in which consciousness and force, spirit and matter are complementary, non-dual polarities at each level of existence – physical, vital, mental, and spiritual – has as its foundation precisely this premise. And such a theory is in fact consistent with the underlying connectedness and evolutionary self-determination of everything in the universe, as proposed by quantum physics. What is missing from that theory is the principle that would explain the emergence of a highly ordered self-determining physical universe in the first place, and then the emergence of consciousness from such a material base. Sri Aurobindo’s basic argument for the evolution of consciousness in a material universe is that it could not happen from an inconscient base; consciousness must be a fundamental principle of the universe itself in order for it to emerge; it is “a self-involution of Consciousness in form and a self-evolution out of form.” Therefore the fundamental complementarity of consciousness-force provides an explanation at every level of the order that exists in the observable universe, and of every other complementarity that we can identify as being essential to an adequate understanding of things. In this vision of reality, the ancient and modern dualities that have always presented insoluble paradoxes, such as form and substance, stability and change, chaos and order, life and death, self and other, are finally resolved into unities rather than contraries.

Do the current limitations of our knowledge therefore indicate something essential about the limited nature of “mind,” or do they indicate an essential indeterminacy and consequent unknowability in the nature of “reality?”  Both of these questions, surprisingly, must be answered in the negative. The sense mind, the rational mind, and the inspired imagination, etc., as we know them, are limited, but the limitations are evolutionary, temporal, structural limitations; they are not essential. And the indeterminacy of processes, beyond the conservation of structural histories and patterns of adaptation, especially at the point of disequilibrium where novel forms can emerge, does not make them essentially unknowable simply because they are non-computational. Reality is infinitely complex but it is also only What Is; the evolutionary structures at every level of matter, life, and mind are only structures of consciousness, knowable by the Self through Identity. But that requires the evolutionary emergence of another potential of consciousness beyond mind, which Sri Aurobindo chose to call “supermind.” In his descriptions of its characteristics, he speaks of the necessity of realizing in oneself an extraordinary force of concentration, an absolute stillness, and a cancellation of the mind’s normal patterns of reactions and responses to external stimuli. It is a process in which the personal will merges with the universal Will, the individual mind with universal Consciousness.

So, if we ask then, Is reality Finite or Infinite? the Unchanging or Change? Being or Time? Spirit or Matter? Substance or Form?, the answer in every case is “both,” although any particular definition will depend on the point of view, just as Heisenberg said. And after a century of unparalleled advances in both scientific and spiritual knowledge, a scientific mind like Prigogine’s can therefore now think, along with the mystic philosopher:

Each great period of science has led to some model of nature. For classical science it was the clock; for nineteenth-century science, the period of the Industrial Revolution, it was an engine running down. What will be the symbol for us? …In some of the most beautiful manifestations of sculpture, be it in the dancing Shiva or in the miniature temples of Guerrero, there appears very clearly the search for a junction between stillness and motion, time arrested and time passing. We believe that this confrontation will give our period its uniqueness. ^22

During the brief period of historical time known as the 20th Century, as the discoveries of the new physics were taking place, and Sri Aurobindo’s discovery of the supermind was being formulated, in the forefront of the “human sciences” also many barriers of  consciousness were ceding: Husserl wrote The Idea of Phenomenology in 1907 and The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology in 1933. Freud published his theory of the three-fold structure of mind in 1923, Heidegger published Being and Time in 1927, Whitehead’s Process and Reality was published in 1929. And one could go on: Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception in 1945, Jean Gebser’s The Ever-Present Origin in 1949/53, Sri Aurobindo’s later works,1940-50, Heidegger’s  writings on technology and language,1950-60, to the newer physics of the 1960s, the post-structural philosophies of the 1970s, the quantum biology of the 1980s, and the super-technology of the 1990s.

As we shall perhaps see, if we explore in greater detail the explosion of ideas that characterized this epoch in the development of thought, within the context of the century’s equally dramatic “outer” developments, the arc of the entire project of human consciousness throughout may appear to have been delimited inspired by one evolutionary formula for human advancement: to reconcile Spirit and Matter. To achieve the realization of their unity; to consciously perceive the stillness and force that combined constitute the essence of the infinite energy of existence; and to know directly by a “supramental consciousness” – one with the world it perceives – that unity and diversity, identity and difference are the principles of all Being in Time, could be the outcome of the pursuit of Knowledge, as Sri Aurobindo indicated. But for it to be so, he said, the human mind “must traverse the degrees which our inner consciousness imposes on us and, whether by objective method of analysis applied to Life and Mind as to Matter or by subjective synthesis and illumination, arrive at the repose of the ultimate unity without denying the energy of the expressive multiplicity.”^23   A study of the 20th Century in relation to the vision of Sri Aurobindo should reveal the progress made along this arc of potential human development, and also give us a clear indication of the distance still to be traversed if we are to complete the journey.

Physics and the Philosophy of Evolution

Bibliography

1. The Mother, “Sri Aurobindo does not belong to the past nor to history. Sri Aurobindo is the Future advancing towards its realization…” (April 2, 1967)
2. See Arthur Kroker (2004), The Will to Technology and the Culture of Nihilism and Frederic Bender (2003), The Culture of Extinction: Toward a Philosophy of Deep Ecology
3. Sri Aurobindo (1970ed.), The Life Divine, pp.1-5
4. Ibid., p.12
5. Sri Aurobindo (1970ed.), The Synthesis of Yoga, p.1,6
6. Sri Aurobindo, op.cit. (LD), p.14
7. LD, p.14
8. LD, p.14
9. LD, p.14
10. Fritjof Capra, The Turning Point, p.90
11. Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stenger (1984), Order Out of Chaos, p.226
12. Stephen Hawking (2001), The Universe in a Nutshell, p.12
13. Capra, op.cit. p.89
14. Capra, op.cit., p.81
15. Capra (1996), The Web of Life, p. 39
16. Hawking, op.cit., p.26
17. Hawking (p.85) gives this rather droll characterization of the anthropic principle: “While it may be that intelligent beings can evolve without galaxies ands stars, this seems unlikely. …The anthropic principle says that the universe has to be more or less as we see it, because if it were different, there wouldn’t be anyone here to observe it.” And although he frequently equates the physical universe with “reality,” he qualifies his position as a positivist in a manner that is pertinent here (p.59): “From the viewpoint of positivist philosophy, one cannot determine what is real. All one can do is find which mathematical models describe the universe we live in. It turns out that a mathematical model involving imaginary time predicts not only effects we have already observed but also effects we have not been able to measure yet nevertheless believe in for other reasons. So what is real and what is imaginary? Is the distinction just in our minds?”
18. Humberta Maturana and FranciscoVarela (1987), The Tree of Knowledge – The biological roots of human understanding, p.96
19.  Ibid., p.211
20. Roger Penrose (1994), Shadows of the Mind, p. 406
21. LD, p.13
22. Prigogine & Stenger, op.cit., p. 22-23
23. LD, p.13

© Rod Hemsell
4/06

Sri Aurobindo and Transpersonal Psychology – by Michael Miovic, MD

ABSTRACT:

This article provides an overview of Sri Aurobindo’s psychological
thought and system of Integral Yoga Psychology (IYP). Relevant
biographical and historical background is introduced, and his influence
on the development of transpersonal psychology reviewed. Using Sri
Aurobindo’s cosmology of consciousness as a framework for transpersonal
experience, IYP’s model of planes of consciousness and parts of the
being is explained and illustrated with quotations from Sri Aurobindo’s
writings. Emphasis is placed on the psychic being (soul) and overhead
planes of consciousness, as these are central to IYP’s psycho-spiritual
method of transforming the ego. Finally, implications for transpersonal
development and transpersonal therapy are formulated, and some clinical
applications given.

Introduction

Sri Aurobindo (1872-1950), the noted Indian spiritual teacher, is a
seminal thinker whose writings have immense value for transpersonal
psychology. In addition to interpreting the “perennial philosophy” to
the West in an experientially authoritative and intellectually accurate
fashion, he also made original contributions to transpersonal
psychology. While several important transpersonal thinkers have been
influenced by Sri Aurobindo’s work (including Murphy, Wilber,
Cortright, and others), this journal has never undertaken a
comprehensive presentation of his psychological system. The purpose of
this essay, therefore, is to explain Sri Aurobindo’s contributions to
transpersonal psychology and provide readers with an overview to use in
approaching his complex writings directly. Due to limited space, this
article will be more theoretical than clinical, although clinical
applications will be indicated in several places.

Biographical and Historical Background. Born Aurobindo Ghose in
Calcutta, on August 15, 1872, Aurobindo was educated in England and
graduated at the top of his class at Cambridge, where he studied
classics and imbibed both Christianity and the paradigm of Western
rationalism. Aurobindo returned to his homeland in the 1890s with the
aim of fostering Indian nationalism, and as a young man helped lead the
first movement for Indian independence, which was put down by the
British and later resuscitated by Gandhi. In 1910, after serving a
yearlong prison sentence for sedition, Aurobindo moved to Pondicherry,
then in the French territory of India, where he dedicated the rest of
his life to his spiritual practice and teaching.

By the early 1920s, Aurobindo had gained recognition in India as an
accomplished yogi, prompting the appellation of “Sri” Aurobindo (Sri is
a Sanskrit term of respect given to important spiritual figures). In
1926, he founded the Sri Aurobindo Ashram, a small spiritual community,
in conjunction with Mirra Alfassa (1878-1973), his French collaborator
and co-teacher. Within the Ashram, Alfassa came to be called “the
Mother,” in accordance with how female spiritual figures are honored in
India. As the Mother, she administered all of the daily functions of
the Ashram and personally guided residents in their sadhana (spiritual
discipline). Sri Aurobindo always considered the Mother to be his
spiritual peer, and contrary to some popular misconceptions, they were
never married and had no romantic liaison. At the end of her life, the
Mother also founded Auroville (located a few miles north of
Pondicherry), an international community that seeks to evolve a new
spiritually and materially sustainable lifestyle for the 21st
millennium.

By the time of Sri Aurobindo’s passing in 1950, his reputation had
grown international. Pearl Buck and others nominated him for the Nobel
Prize in literature in 1950, and many think he would have won it had he
lived. Since his passing, India has made stamps and coins in Sri
Aurobindo’s honor, schoolbooks remember him as a founding father of the
Indian nation, his bust sits permanently in the Indian Parliament, and
he has become recognized as one of the leading Indian spiritual figures
of the 20th century (see Heehs, 1989, for biographical details).

Culturally and philosophically, Sri Aurobindo’s key contributions to
the ancient tradition of Indian yoga were to emphasize the spiritual
possibilities of matter and embodied life on earth, and to
counterbalance male images of the Divine (e.g., as Shiva, Vishnu,
Brahma) with a renewed appreciation for the Divine as Mother
(Radhakrishnan & Moore, 1957; Aurobindo, 1999). Sri Aurobindo thus
belongs to the resurgence of the feminine principle that is felt
elsewhere in modern religious and spiritual discourse, and the work of
Sri Aurobindo and the Mother upholds the core values of modern
feminism. Psychodynamically, Sri Aurobindo and the Mother are
especially interesting because they represent one of the rare instances
in cultural history where both paternal and maternal role models are
figured simultaneously in the role of spiritual teacher, and the
distribution of authority between them is equal and symmetrically
reciprocated. That fact alone should warrant further study of their
work by transpersonal psychologists.

Influence on Transpersonal Psychology

Sri Aurobindo’s ideas have already influenced the development of
transpersonal psychology in many ways. Spiegelberg, who helped found
the American Academy of Asian Studies, was an Aurobindo enthusiast and
introduced Michael Murphy to the writings of Sri Aurobindo. Murphy
actually studied in the Sri Aurobindo Ashram in the late 1950s, and his
project at Esalen was in part inspired by this experience, as was his
later work on transpersonal experiences of the body (Murphy, 1992;
Taylor, 1999). At the same time, Chaudhuri, whom Sri Aurobindo
handpicked to represent his Integral Yoga in the United States, was
friendly with many of the leading figures of the West Coast renaissance
in the 1950s and 1960s, and founded the Asian Institute of Integral
Studies, which later became the California Institute of Integral
Studies (Chaudhuri, 1965). Parsons, who is currently documenting
Murphy’s work at Esalen, has also written insightfully on the subject
of spiritual psychology with reference to Aurobindo (Parsons, 1999, and
personal communication, 2004). Cortright, too, uses many of Sri
Aurobindo’s ideas in his transpersonal approach to psychotherapy and
T-groups, and recently led a conference on transpersonal/yoga
psychology in Auroville (Cortright, 1997, 2001; Cortright, Kahn, &
Hess, 2003; and personal communication, 2005).

In addition, Wilber cites Sri Aurobindo often and ranks him as one of
the pioneers of integral studies. Although Wilber feels Sri Aurobindo
never fully assimilated the intersubjective (cultural) and
interobjective (social) differentiations of modernity (Wilber, 2000,
pp. 74-85), one may disagree as Sri Aurobindo’s life and work suggest
otherwise. Biographical evidence shows that he successfully blended
Asian and Western values in his personal life (Heehs, 1989), thus
demonstrating assimilation of the cultural relativity proposed by
modernism, and his works on socio-cultural and geo-political evolution,
The Human Cycle and The Ideal of Human Unity, are all about the
developments in and differentiations among the three value spheres of
art, ethics (morals), and science that Wilber considers central to
modernity (Aurobindo, 1970c; Wilber, 2000, pp. 59-73). Furthermore, one
has only to read accounts of Sri Aurobindo’s support of the Allies in
World War II, or his parting reflections on the cold war and the United
Nations, to see that he grasped the fundamental issues of the 20th
century as lucidly as any (Nirodbaran, 1972; Aurobindo, 1970c, pp.
556-571). Indeed, it is precisely because of Sri Aurobindo’s modernism
that contemporary Aurobindonian thinkers are so concerned about the
pressing interpersonal, cultural, social, and political issues of our
times (Lithman, 2003).

In India, Sri Aurobindo’s work has had more impact through yoga than
psychology, probably because yoga has such a long history in Indian
culture. Nonetheless, several authors have published important
presentations of Sri Aurobindo’s psychological thought, many of them
under the auspices of the Sri Aurobindo International Centre of
Education. Sen was the first to write on the subject and coined the
term “integral psychology” to characterize Sri Aurobindo’s approach
(Sen, 1986). Dalal has written several excellent collections of essays
that compare Sri Aurobindo’s ideas and Western psychology, and this
article owes much to his efforts (Dalal, 2001a, 2001b). Vrinte has
written comparative studies of Sri Aurobindo, Maslow, transpersonal
psychology, and Wilber’s work (Vrinte, 1995, 1996, 2002). Basu, a
psychiatrist, developed an integral model of health based on Sri
Aurobindo’s work, which importantly gives due credit to scientific
biomedicine and moves beyond the current model of
complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) to a fully consciousness-based
model (Basu, 2000). Cornelissen has organized several international
conferences on integral psychology, resulting in two collections of
essays (Cornelissen, 2001; Cornelissen & Joshi, 2004), and is
presently collaborating with others to compile the first comprehensive
textbook of Indian psychology (Cornelissen, Dalal, & Rao, in
press). Rao, who is co-heading this project and dedicated a career to
research in parapsychology, has authored an insightful exposition of
classical Indian psychology and modern non-local research, in which Sri
Aurobindo’s contributions are duly noted (Rao, 2002).

Integral Yoga Psychology

Overview

Integral Yoga Psychology (IYP) is eminently transpersonal in that it is
interested in studying and promoting the highest levels of spiritual
development, and of transforming human egoic consciousness into an
organized center for manifesting the Divine on earth. As a worldview,
IYP is theistic, experiential, empiric, and evolutionary. However, it
is not a religion, entails no proscribed beliefs or practices, and does
not ask anyone to view Sri Aurobindo and the Mother as gurus. Although
IYP is more an approach to transpersonal development than it is a type
of transpersonal therapy, it has points of clinical relevance that will
be discussed later.

In addition to the fact that IY P is based on experiential insights,
there are three main challenges in coming to a balanced understanding
of IYP, which are as follows:

1. The recorded works of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother comprise a vast
literature that spans over 60 years and encompasses both written and
oral, public and private, communications;

2. Sri Aurobindo’ s writings can be difficult to grasp, because his
Victorian prose is long and meditative, while modern readers are
accustomed to shorter sentences and bullets of information;

3. Sri Aurobindo’s cosmology is the opposite of the materialist
worldview of Western science, and one must understand his metaphysics
in order to understand IYP . This essay will attempt to mitigate these
problems by presenting a concise overview of IYP, drawing selectively
from Sri Aurobindo’s writings so as to illustrate key concepts. Several
passages from Sri Aurobindo’s letters to disciples are quoted because
his letters are usually more succinct and practical than his formal
writings. Readers interested in the Mother’s life and work are referred
to Van Vrekhem for further
information (Van Vrekhem, 1998, 2000).

Cosmology of Consciousness

In terms of cosmology, Western science begins with the operational
assumption that matter is the only reality, and then directs all of its
energies at studying the details of how the material universe evolved
after the “big bang,” and how life evolved on earth much later.
However, Sri Aurobindo questions the basic assumption of materialism
and proposes an alternate, spiritual hypothesis for interpreting
evolutionary biology, psychology, and consciousness studies. In his
magnum opus on philosophy, The Life Divine, Sri Aurobindo argues that
matter is simply a finite and dormant manifestation of the infinitely
conscious Divine Reality, and that biological evolution is the ordered
process through which transcendent Spirit expresses itself under the
conditions of matter (Aurobindo, 1970b).

Central to Sri Aurobindo’s interpretation of the evolution of
consciousness is his cosmological account of how matter came to exist
in the first place. In brief, Sri Aurobindo says that the supreme
Being/Reality sequentially delimits or differentiates a portion of its
infinite nature to become finite matter, and that this compressive
process happened (or is constantly happening) before time and space
came into existence, because the space-time continuum is a material
phenomenon. Sri Aurobindo calls the descending process through which
Spirit becomes matter involution, while evolution is the secondary
process through which Spirit slowly discloses the divine potential
involved in matter (Aurobindo, 1970b). Thus, Sri Aurobindo’s ideas
build upon and extend the range of classical Indian philosophy. In his
own words (written in the third person for public circulation):

The teaching of Sri Aurobindo starts from that of the ancient sages of
India that behind the appearances of the universe there is the Reality
of a Being and Consciousness, a Self of all things, one and eternal.
All beings are united in that One Self and Spirit but divided by a
certain separativity of consciousness, an ignorance of their true Self
and Reality in the mind, life and body. It is possible by a certain
psychological discipline to remove this veil of separative
consciousness and become aware of the true Self, the Divinity within us
and all. Sri Aurobindo’s teaching states that this One Being and
Consciousness is involved here in Matter. Evolution is the method by
which it liberates itself; consciousness appears in what seems to be
inconscient, and once having appeared is self-impelled to grow higher
and higher and at the same time to enlarge and develop towards a
greater and greater perfection. Life is the first step of this release
of consciousness; mind is the second; but the evolution does not finish
with mind, it awaits a release into something greater, a consciousness
which is spiritual and supramental. The next step of the evolution must
be towards the development of Supermind and Spirit as the dominant
power in the conscious being. For only then will the involved Divinity
in things release itself entirely and it become possible for life to
manifest perfection. (Aurobindo, 1972a)

Consequently, for Sri Aurobindo transpersonal experiences and strivings
are the mark of evolution at work, and indeed human beings are only a
transitional species on the way to a more spiritual (i.e., supramental)
life-form that will evolve on earth in the future. While one may
certainly question Sri Aurobindo’s predictions, one has at least to
respect his intellectual integrity in taking a stance on key issues.
For instance, now that we have brain scans of Tibetan monks and
Christian nuns that reveal a unique pattern of cerebral metabolism
associated with transcendent states (Newberg & d’Aquili, 1998,
2001) one can expect such studies to become more nuanced in the future,
perhaps describing a variety of psycho-spiritual states and capacities
according to different associated neuro-physiologic and neuro-anatomic
parameters.

Unless transpersonal psychology is willing to let transpersonal
experiences be reduced back to brain chemistry, it will need to
articulate how the brain can be a correlated substrate of experience
rather than its generator and final cause. Almost a century ago, in his
first draft of the Life Divine (written 1914-19), Sri Aurobindo
anticipated this dilemma and articulated a consciousness paradigm that
can absorb emerging developments in neuroscience without needing to
accept to the dogma of materialism (Miovic, 2003, pp. 113-32, and
2004).

Planes of Consciousness and Parts of the Being

Sri Aurobindo describes the sequential involution of the infinite
Reality into finite matter using the metaphor of a series of descending
steps on a staircase, which he calls “planes of consciousness.” Listed
from highest to lowest in descending ontological order, the major
planes of consciousness are as follows (based on Aurobindo, 1970a, pp.
233-77):

1. Sacchidananda (Brahman, the transcendent Divine)
2. Supermind (the self-determining infinite consciousness)
3. Overmind (cosmic consciousness, plane of the Gods and Goddesses)
4. Intuitive Mind
5. Illumined Mind
6. Higher Mind
7. Mind (with several layers)
8. Vital (with higher, middle, and lower subdivisions)
9. Subtle Physical
10. Physical proper (usually refers to the body)
11. Subconscient (individual and universal “unconscious” of psychology)
12. Inconscient (matter proper and existential Non-Being)

According to Sri Aurobindo’s spiritual experience, all of the
non-material planes of consciousness listed above (i.e., everything
from the subtle physical up to the Sacchidananda) exist in their own
right, independent of matter, and would continue to exist even if our
current material universe came to an end. Thus, Sri Aurobindo views
each plane of consciousness as a universe unto itself, and the sum of
created existence as a spectrum or stacked series of universes that
ascend from densely unconscious but manifest matter at the base, to
fully conscious but unmanifested Sacchidananda at the peak
(sacchidananda is a Vedantic term that means
“existence-consciousness-bliss”).

In addition to this vertical scale of consciousness, Sri Aurobindo also
describes a concentric dimension of consciousness, which he refers to
as “parts of the being.” While the planes of consciousness are
impersonal states or gradations of existence, the “parts of the being”
refer to organized centers and faculties of consciousness that exist or
can emerge in the human being. Through these, the human being becomes
aware of and enters into relationship with the aforementioned planes of
consciousness. The major parts of the being are listed below, from most
interior on the left to most exterior on the right:

- Inmost Being Inner Being Outer Being
- Psychic being Inner mental Mental (cognitive) (evolving soul)
- Inner vital Vital (affective)
- Inner physical Physical (biological)

Essentially, the outer being with its physical, vital (i.e. emotional
and libidinal), and mental awareness constitutes the “self” or “ego” of
the Western biopsychosocial model. Between the psychic being (evolving
soul) and the inner being stands the Purusha, or pure witness
consciousness that people sometimes experience in meditation, while
behind the psychic being stand the Jivatman and Atman (non-evolving
Self). The Jivatman and Atman will be described later, but space does
not permit a discussion of the Purusha, so readers are referred to
Dalal for further exposition of that topic (Dalal, 2001a).

Experientially, Sri Aurobindo observes that the planes of consciousness
above the Mind, when clearly perceived, are subjectively felt to exist
above the head and pour their influence down into the inner being from
there. For this reason, he often refers to them as the “overhead”
planes. In contrast, the parts of the inner and inmost beings are
experienced as follows:

The chakras as residing within the body or along the spine and opening
to the inner mental, vital and physical sheaths of consciousness (see
Table 1); the psychic being (soul) behind the heart chakra; and the
Jivatman and Atman entirely above the body (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp.
233-377).

The neuro-physiological correlates for this somatotopic organization of
experience are not currently known, but offer a fascinating subject for
future research. In the following letter, Sri Aurobindo summarizes the
psychological and spiritual functions of the various parts of the
being:

There are, we might say, two beings in us, one on the surface, our
ordinary exterior mind, life, body consciousness, another behind the
veil, an inner mind, an inner life, an inner physical consciousness
constituting another or inner self. This inner self once awake opens in
its turn to our true real eternal self. It opens inwardly to the soul,
called in the language of this yoga the psychic being which supports
our successive births and at each birth assumes a new mind, life and
body. It opens above to the Self or Spirit which is unborn and by
conscious recovery of it we transcend the changing personality and
achieve freedom and full mastery over our nature. (Aurobindo, 1970a,
pp. 1020-21)

The rest of this essay will elaborate and illustrate the various
relationships among the planes of consciousness and parts of the being
outlined
above, and describe their relevance to transpersonal development.

Liberation vs. Transformation

One of the perennial sources of confusion for Western transpersonalists
interested in the perennial philosophy is the question of what
precisely constitutes “enlightenment.” Variously referred to as moksha,
mukti, nirvana, satori, Self-realization, or realization of the Atman
or Brahman in different traditions of Buddhist and Hindu literature,
Western readers may well wonder if the Buddhists who experience nirvana
as no-self (anatta or anatman) are achieving the same enlightenment as
the Vedantists who experience the transcendent Self alone as real.

Also, some teachers and traditions have described enlightenment as a
sudden and final awakening (such as Ramana Maharshi and various Zen
masters), while others (including Sri Aurobindo) maintain the
experience can be gradually cultivated and grow in frequency,
intensity, depth, and duration. Sri Aurobindo accepts all of these
terms as roughly equivalent, and notes both the commonalities and
nuanced variations in people’s experience of enlightenment:

The Buddhist Nirvana and the Adwaitin’s Moksha are the same thing. It
corresponds to a realisation in which one does not feel oneself any
longer as an individual with such a name or such a form, but an
infinite eternal Self spaceless (even when in space), timeless (even
when in time). Note that one can perfectly well do actions in that
condition and it is not to be gained only by Samadhi [yogic trance
state]. (Aurobindo, 1970a, p. 62)

The impressions in the approach to Infinity or the entry into it are
not always quite the same; much depends on the way in which the mind
approaches it. It is felt first by some as an infinity above, by others
as an infinity around into which the mind disappears (as an energy) by
losing its limits. Some feel not the absorption of the mind-energy into
the infinite, but a falling entirely inactive; others feel it as a
lapse or disappearance of energy into pure Existence. Some first feel
the infinity as a vast existence into which all sinks or disappears,
others, as you describe it, as an infinite ocean of Light above, others
as an infinite ocean of Power above. If certain schools of Buddhists
felt it in their experience as a limitless Shunya [void or non-being],
the Vedantists, on the contrary, see it as a positive Self-Existence
erected into various philosophies, each putting its conception as
definitive; but behind each conception there was such an experience.
(Aurobindo, 1970a, p. 63)

Sri Aurobindo often refers to the realization of the non-dual awareness
described above as spiritual liberation, because it brings a release
from the egocentric consciousness of the outer mind, life, and body.
However, he notes that this first realization of the Self is passive,
and can be followed by a dynamic heightening and widening of
consciousness that leads eventually to transformation of both the inner
and outer beings. The following letter to a disciple further describes
the difference between liberation and transformation in the sequence of
transpersonal development:

The realisation of t he Spirit comes long before the development of
overmind or supermind; hundreds of sadhaks [spiritual seekers] in all
times have had the realisation of the Atman in the higher mental
planes, buddheh paratah, but the supramental realisation was not
theirs. One can get partial realisations of the Self or Spirit or the
Divine on any plane, mental, vital, physical even, and when one rises
above the ordinary mental plane of man into a higher and larger mind,
the Self begins to appear in all its conscious wideness. It is by full
entry into this wideness of the Self that cessation of mental activity
becomes possible; one gets the inner Silence. After that this inner
Silence can remain even when there is activity of any kind; the being
remains silent within, the action goes on in the instruments, and one
receives all the necessary initiations and execution of action whether
mental, vital or physical from a higher source without the fundamental
peace and calm of the Spirit being troubled.

The overmind and supermind states are something yet higher than this;
but before one can understand them, one must first have the
self-realisation [Self-realization], the full action of the
spiritualised mind and heart, the psychic awakening, the liberation of
the imprisoned consciousness….(Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 105-6)

In short, Sri Aurobindo opines that what people usually mean by the
word “enlightenment” is not necessarily the end of transpersonal
development, but can be rather the beginning of a higher evolution. Sri
Aurobindo’s views on the Buddha and Buddhist psychology are complex and
deserve a separate essay. Briefly, Buddhist phenomenology has certainly
described aspects of Sri Aurobindo’s transpersonal anatomy of
awareness, but using different terminology and often an agnostic
world-view. Sri Aurobindo accepts this phenomenology as a statement of
experience, but notes that more comprehensive experiences are possible,
too, and he rejects Impermanence as the ultimate truth of existence.
For Sri Aurobindo, omnipresent Reality is the ultimate truth of
existence, of which the Buddhist Void and phenomenal impermanence are
only partial aspects. Also, he feels that no school of Buddhism ever
clearly set the goal of achieving a supramental evolution on earth
(Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 59-69).

Self, Overmind, and Supermind

Whatever one decides to make of Sri Aurobindo’s larger claims about
cosmology and the evolution of consciousness, his phenomenological
descriptions of the “overhead” planes of consciousness are a useful
contribution to transpersonal psychology. Space does not permit a
detailed study here of the differences among the Higher Mind, Illumined
Mind, and Intuitive Mind, but the following statement nicely summarizes
some of the essential qualities and characteristics of each, and also
describes further the relationship between static (passive) and dynamic
realizations of the Self (Atman):

The Self governs the diversity of its creation by its unity on all the
planes from the Higher Mind upwards on which the realisation of the One
is the natural basis of consciousness. But as one goes upward, the view
changes, the power of consciousness changes, the Light becomes ever
more intense and potent. Although the static realisation of Infinity
and Eternity and the Timeless One remains the same, the vision of the
workings of the One becomes ever wider and is attended with a greater
instrumentality of Force and a more comprehensive grasp of what has to
be known and done. All possible forms and constructions of things
become more and more visible, put in their proper place, utilisable.
Moreover, what is thought-knowledge in the Higher Mind becomes
illumination in the Illumined Mind and direct intimate vision in the
Intuition. But the Intuition sees in flashes and combines through a
constant play of light—through revelations, inspirations, intuitions,
swift discriminations. The overmind sees calmly, steadily, in great
masses and large extensions of space and time and relation, globally;
it creates and acts in the same way—it is the world of the great Gods,
the divine Creators. Only, each creates in his own way; he sees all but
sees all from his own viewpoint. There is not the absolute supramental
harmony and certitude. These, inadequately expressed, are some of the
differences. I speak, of course, of these planes in themselves—when
acting in the human consciousness they are necessarily much diminished
in their working by having to depend on the human instrumentation of
mind, vital and physical. Only when these are quieted, they get a
fuller force and reveal more of their character. (Aurobindo, 1970a, p.
1154)

As stated above, Sri Aurobindo describes the Overmind as the plane of
the great gods and goddesses of Greek, Hindu, Mayan, and other
traditions. In his view, the Gods are real beings who exist eternally
on the overmental plane, and are not merely creations of a primitive
human mentality. The human mind can build forms that the Gods accept,
but the Gods exist in their own right and can inspire various forms of
manifestation into the human mind. For example, Sri Aurobindo noted
that the Greek goddess Pallas Athene and the Indian goddess Maheshwari
are not two different beings, but the same being manifested differently
in two separate cultures (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 383-87, 389). According
to this principle, the Egyptian Aman-Re, the Greek Apollo, the Hindu
Surya, and the Mayan Sun God are not four separate beings, but one and
the same, as it is for the Greek Poseidon, Hindu Varuna, and Mayan
Chac. In my experience, the presence of these immortal beings can still
be felt at various temples in Greece, Mexico, and India.

A second important characteristic of the Overmind, according to Sri
Aurobindo, is that people generally have experiences of cosmic
consciousness through opening to this plane of existence. Since Bucke
introduced the term “cosmic consciousness” to describe various mystical
states drawn from biographical data (Bucke, 1969), the term has been
used loosely to denote a broad range of transpersonal experiences. Sri
Aurobindo uses the term “cosmic consciousness” specifically to describe
the awareness of cosmic or universal (i.e., not personal or individual)
forces operative on each plane of consciousness. Such cosmic
consciousness may come before spiritual liberation, but usually it
comes later, with the overmental realization, which Sri Aurobindo
evokes vividly here:

When the Overmind descends, the predominance of the centralizing
ego-sense is entirely subordinated, lost in largeness of being and
finally abolished; a wide cosmic perception and feeling of a boundless
universal self and movement replaces it: many motions that were
formerly egocentric may still continue, but they occur as currents or
ripples in the cosmic wideness. Thought, for the most part, no longer
seems to originate individually in the body or the person but manifests
from above or comes in upon the cosmic mind-waves: all inner individual
sight or intelligence of things is now a revelation or illumination of
what is seen or comprehended, but the source of the revelation is not
one’s separate self but in the universal knowledge; the feelings,
emotions, sensations are similarly felt as waves from the same cosmic
immensity breaking upon the subtle and the gross body and responded to
in kind from the individual centre of the universality. In this
boundless largeness, not only the separate ego but all sense of
individuality, even of a subordinated or instrumental individuality,
may entirely disappear; the cosmic existence, the cosmic consciousness,
the cosmic delight, the play of cosmic forces alone are left.
(Aurobindo, 1970b, p. 987)

Obviously, to live in such an overmental consciousness permanently
would constitute an extraordinary transpersonal achievement, for it
would entirely alter one’s normal awareness and whole sense of self.
Nonetheless, Sri Aurobindo still considers the Overmind as pertaining
to the “Ignorance,” because it is a consciousness of multiplicity not
absolute unity. In contrast, the Supermind is a unitary
Truth-Consciousness: The Supermind is in its very essence a
Truth-Consciousness, a consciousness always free from the Ignorance
that is the foundation of our present natural or evolutionary existence
and from which nature in us is trying to arrive at self-knowledge and
world-knowledge and a right consciousness and the right use of our
existence in the universe. The Supermind, because it is a
Truth-Consciousness, has this knowledge inherent in it and this power
of true existence; its course is straight and can go direct to its aim,
its field is wide and can even be made illimitable. This is because its
very nature is knowledge: it has not to acquire knowledge but possesses
it in its own right; its steps are not from nescience or ignorance into
the imperfect light, but from truth to greater truth, from right
perception to deeper perception, from intuition to intuition, from
illumination to utter and boundless luminousness, from growing
widenesses to the utter vasts and to very infinitude. On its summits it
possesses the divine omniscience and omnipotence, but even in an
evolutionary movement of its own graded self-manifestation by which it
would eventually reveal its own highest heights it must be in its very
nature essentially free from ignorance and error: It starts from truth
and light and moves always in truth and light. (Aurobindo, 1971, pp.
79-80)

In Sri Aurobindo’s judgment, the central limitation of the perennial
philosophy is that it leads only to a passive perception of the
transcendent Self (Atman), whereas supramental realization would confer
an active mastery of phenomenal existence, because Supermind is the
subsidiary aspect or movement of Sacchidananda that has, in fact,
created all the worlds and planes of phenomenal manifestation. Sri
Aurobindo’s final prose writings describe possible individual, social,
and biological routes a supramental evolution could take in the future.
The following passage highlights
some of his intimations about the future of the body:

New powers have to be acquired by the body that our present humanity
could not hope to realize, could not even dream of or could only
imagine. Much that can now only be known, worked out, or created by the
use of invented tools and machinery might be achieved by the new body
in its own power or by the inhabitant spirit through its own direct
spiritual force. The body itself might acquire new means and ranges of
communication with other bodies, new processes of acquiring knowledge,
a new aesthesis, new potencies of manipulation of itself and objects.
It might not be impossible for it to possess or disclose means native
to its own constitution, substance, or natural instrumentation for
making the far near and annulling distance, cognizing what is now
beyond the body’s cognizance, acting where action is now out of its
reach or its domain, developing subtleties and plasticities that could
not be permitted under present conditions to the needed fixity of a
material frame…. (Aurobindo, 1971, pp. 76-77)

Note well that Sri Aurobindo views the “new powers” described here as
new properties and abilities of the physical body itself, not the usual
clairvoyance, telepathy, telekinesis, and other parapsychological
phenomenon that arise from the inner being (see below). For IYP, this
distinction is relevant to correctly interpreting Murphy’s extensive
documentation of mind-body phenomenon (Murphy, 1992), and related data
from contemporary non-local research (such as Braud, 2000; and Rao,
2002). Whether or not certain esoteric doctrines implied a supramental
transformation of the body is open to debate, however, Sri Aurobindo
makes his own position clear. It should also be clearly understood that
Sri Aurobindo’s notion of a supramental evolution would necessarily
encompass all four quadrants of Wilber’s model of psychology, as Wilber
seems to think differently (Wilber, 2000). Finally, note that future
alterations to the human brain and body through genetic engineering
would not contradict Sri Aurobindo’s proposition of a supramental
evolution, but would rather constitute one route (among others) through
which such an evolution could proceed.

The Psychic Being

Practically, the central process of IYP is the evocation (“bringing
forward”) of the true soul, or seat of divine individuality within each
person, as the soul alone can lead towards a radical transformation of
the outer ego. Sri Aurobindo calls the soul the “psychic being,”
coining his term from the original meaning of the Greek root psyche,
and credits the Mother with having shown him the full practical import
of the psychic being. The following letter lucidly differentiates the
parts of the inmost being (Atman, Jivatman, and psychic being) and
describes their respective roles in the process of spiritual liberation
and spiritual transformation:

The Jivatman, spark-soul and psychic being are three different forms of
the same reality and they must not be mixed up together, as that
confuses the clearness of the inner experience. The Jivatman or spirit,
as it is usually called in English, is self-existent above the
manifested or instrumental being—it is superior to birth and death,
always the same, the individual Self or Atman. It is the eternal true
being of the individual. The soul is a spark of the Divine which is not
seated above the manifested being, but comes down into the
manifestation to support its evolution in the material world. It is at
first an undifferentiated power of the Divine Consciousness containing
all possibilities which have not yet taken form, but to which it is the
function of evolution to give form. This spark is there in all living
beings from the lowest to the highest.

The psychic being is formed by the soul in its evolution. It supports
the mind, vital, body, grows by their experiences, carries the nature
from life to life. It is the psychic or caitya purusa. At first it is
veiled by mind, vital and body, but as it grows, it becomes capable of
coming forward and dominating the mind, life and body; in the ordinary
man it depends on them for expression and is not able to take them up
and freely use them. The life of the being is animal or human and not
divine. When the psychic being can by sadhana [spiritual practice]
become dominant and freely use its instruments, then the impulse
towards the Divine becomes complete and the transformation of mind,
vital and body, not merely their liberation, becomes possible.

The Self or Atman being free and superior to birth and death, the
experience of the Jivatman and its unity with the supreme or universal
Self brings the sense of liberation, it is this which is necessary for
the supreme spiritual deliverance: but for the transformation of the
life and nature the awakening of the psychic being and its rule over
the nature are indispensable…. (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 282-283)

IYP’s emphasis on the role of the psychic being in transpersonal
development is one of the key ways in which IYP differs from those
schools of Buddhist psycho-spiritual that do not recognize the
existence of a true soul (see Epstein, 1995). Subjectively, the psychic
being is usually felt as residing deep within the center of the chest,
behind the heart chakra, with which it is frequently confused. Opening
to the psychic being brings feelings of spiritual devotion, surrender
to the Divine, gratitude, sweetness, quiet joy, love of all that is
good and beautiful and harmonious, and a spontaneous recoil from all
that is false, evil, dishonest, selfish, or discordant (Aurobindo,
1970a, pp. 1092-1117).

Note that the intuitive tact or guidance of the psychic being is quite
different from the intuitions of “psychics” in the West, which usually
arise from various levels of the inner being, and are far more prone to
error (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 458-61).

Now, a topic of perennial interest that involves the psychic being is
the process of reincarnation, which Sri Aurobindo accepts as a fact of
life (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 433-63). However, he clarifies that it is
not the outer personality that reincarnates, but rather the psychic
being, whose aim is to grow through the process of evolution. In
another letter to a disciple, Sri Aurobindo commented on this in a
somewhat humorous vein:

You must avoid a common popular blunder about reincarnation. The
popular idea is that Titus Balbus is reborn again as John Smith, a man
with the same personality, character, attainments as he had in his
former life with the sole difference that he wears coat and trousers
instead of a toga and speaks cockney English instead of popular Latin.
That is not the case. What would be the earthly use of repeating the
same personality or character a million times from the beginning of
time till its end? The soul comes into birth for experience, for
growth, for evolution till it can bring the Divine into Matter. It is
the central being that incarnates, not the outer personality—the
personality is simply a mould that it creates for its figures of
experience in that one life. In another birth it will create for itself
a different personality, different capacities, a different
life and career…. (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 455)

Psychologically, an important corollary of IYP’s view of evolution is
that the future is more important than the past, because the whole
mission of the psychic being is to grow towards a supramental
manifestation on earth. Consequently, Sri Aurobindo and the Mother did
not advocate “past-life regression” as a primary therapeutic method
(which is not to say that past-life memories cannot be healing in some
instances), and also warned that people’s purported past-life memories
are easily distorted by imagination and autosuggestion. Only the
psychic being’s memory of the past is veridical, and even when one has
the true psychic memory, that fact alone does not solve the problem of
what to do with one’s present and future lives (for comparative views,
see Weiss, 1992; June, 1996).

As Sri Aurobindo noted succinctly:

But too much importance must not be given to the past lives. For the
purpose of this yoga one is what one is and, still more, what one will
be. What one was has a minor importance. (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 451-2)

In my experience, discussing this future-orientation can help prepare
clients who are considering visiting a “psychic” to get a past-life
reading, or who are interested in past-life regression therapy. By
setting realistic expectations as to what can be achieved with such
consultations, and by maintaining focus on current choices and future
development, the therapist can help the client maintain a
growth-orientation that is both emotionally and spiritually healthy.
This approach also tends to reduce using spirituality to defend against
or bypass psychological issues (see Battista, 1996; and Cortright,
1997).

For example, I once consulted on a case where the client developed an
erotic transference to the therapist t hat was simultaneously defensive
and based on a real past-life relationship as determined by a psychic.
In this situation, acknowledging both the spiritual and psychological
components of the transference allowed the therapy to proceed
productively, because the client felt genuinely understood.

The Inner Being

In the process of trying to contact the psychic being, people often
experience some aspect of the inner being, which stands between the
psychic being and the outer personality (ego). In the terminology of
IYP, the inner being consists of the subtle bodies or sheaths of
consciousness (inner mental, vital, and physical), the chakras of
classical Indian yoga, and an individual element of the subconscious.
The correspondences among the traditional yogic descriptions of the
chakras and Sri Aurobindo’s elucidation of their psycho-spiritual
functions are interesting, and are listed in Table 1. Again, IYP views
most parapsychological and non-local phenomenon studied in the West as
arising from the inner being (for instance, precognition and telepathy
involve the inner mental, “astral travel” the inner vital, and
spontaneous or “miraculous” healing the inner physical).

Sri Aurobindo views the chakras as subtle (i.e., non-material) organs
of perception and action that put the individual consciousness into
relation with the larger universe of forces and beings that operate on
each of the non-material planes of consciousness described previously.
Sri Aurobindo generally agrees with classical Tantric descriptions of
the chakras, however, he does add original insights based on his notion
of the evolution (see Table 1).

For example, he discerns a complex interaction among several parts of
the being and planes of consciousness associated subjectively with the
levels of the subtle body that correspond roughly to the physical
region of the throat, neck, and lower face. This nexus of consciousness
accounts for a variety of psychological and clinical phenomenon,
including the “mental vital,” through which strong emotions and
affective drives can rise up and cloud reasoning (as in the defense
mechanism of rationalization); and the “vital mind,” which is involved
in day-dreaming and narcissistic fantasies of grandeur (Aurobindo,
1970a, pp. 334-38, 1329).

This nexus also encompasses the “mechanical mind,” which can produce
the clinical syndrome of obsessive-compulsive disorder (now known to
have a specific neuropsychological substrate whose function can be
modified both pharmacologically and by cognitive behavior therapy); and
the “physical mind,” which is responsible for problems in speech,
self-expression of mental will, and dealing mentally with the physical
world (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 373-75).

[INSERT TABLE 1 HERE]

With regard to other aspects of classical Tantra, it is important to
note that Sri Aurobindo and the Mother did not recommend raising the
kundalini shakti (force or power) from below, because doing so can lead
to a variety of psychological disturbances acknowledged by
transpersonal psychology (Scotton, Chinen, & Battista, 1996, pp.
261-270). Instead, IYP proceeds by bringing forward the psychic being
and infusing the psychic into the entire inner being first, and then
the outer being, as well. The advantage of this method is that by
virtue of its inherent contact with Divine, the psychic being can
gently open the chakras and canalize the kundalini power without danger
of inducing what transpersonal psychologists now call “spiritual
emergencies” (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 1146-51, 1091-1239).

The Subconscious and Inconscient

The final elements of IYP that will be reviewed here are the
subconscious and the Inconscient. The Inconscient refers to a densely
unconscious inversion of the Sacchidananda in which all being and
existence seem to disappear. From this arises the subatomic and atomic
consciousness of matter, as well as the molecular organization of
matter into intracellular machinery. In yogic experience, the
Inconscient can be felt externally as extending through all material
substance (e.g., even rocks have a consciousness according to Sri
Aurobindo), and internally as supporting the consciousness of the
body’s cells. The Mother’s statements about her “cellular yoga” in the
latter part of her life afford extraordinary glimpses into the
spiritual transformation of the Inconscient (Van Vrekhem, 1998, 2000).
However, this goes well beyond the current purview of transpersonal
psychology, and transpersonal therapists should not confuse the
emotional memories clients frequently have during bodywork with the
true cellular consciousness of supramental yoga.

Psychologically, a much more common clinical phenomenon is the
interfusion of the vital plane with the physical consciousness of the
body, leading to a variety of ways in which emotion can be somatized.
This is how and why body-oriented therapies (massage, acupuncture,
myofascial release, therapeutic touch, etc) can be helpful in expanding
the range of consciously experienced emotion, and in resolving
somatized psychological distress (Basu, 2000).

Alternatively or simultaneously, repressed emotion can be pushed down
and back from frontal awareness into what Sri Aurobindo calls the
subconscious. This plane of consciousness accounts for the
“unconscious” of Western psychology, as well as chronic or recurrent
physical illnesses and habits:

The subconscient is universal as well as individual like all the other
main parts of the Nature….It contains the potentiality of all the
primitive reactions to life which struggle out to the surface from the
dull and inert strands of Matter and form by a constant development a
slowly evolving and self-formulating consciousness; it contains them
not as ideas, perceptions or conscious reactions but as the fluid
substance of these things. But also all that is consciously experienced
sinks down into the subconscient, not as precise though submerged
memories but as obscure yet obstinate impressions of experience, and
these can come up at any time as dreams, as mechanical repetitions of
past thought, feelings, action, etc., as ‘complexes’ exploding into
action and event, etc., etc. The subconscient is the main cause why all
things repeat themselves and nothing ever gets changed except in
appearance. It is the cause why people say character cannot be changed,
the cause also of the constant return of things one hoped to have got
rid of for ever. All seeds are there and all Sanskaras [fixed patterns]
of the mind, vital, body,–it is the main support of death and disease
and the last fortress (seemingly impregnable) of the Ignorance. All too
that is suppressed without being wholly got rid of sinks down there and
remains as seed ready to surge up or sprout up at any moment.
(Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 354-5)

Sri Aurobindo is careful to differentiate the subconscious from the
inner being (subtle physical, inner vital, and inner mental), which he
also calls the “subliminal being.” From the perspective of IYP, Jung’s
memoirs reveal a rich and detailed subliminal awareness (see Jung &
Jaffe, 1961), and his notion of the collective unconscious reflects an
interaction between the subliminal being and portions of the
subconscious. Also, note that Jung did not definitively settle on the
immortality of the soul until the end of his life (McLynn, 1996), so it
is debatable to what degree specific passages from his writings do or
do not reflect the influence of the psychic being on human personality.

Implications: Transpersonal Development

The implications of Integral Yoga Psychology (IYP) for transpersonal
psychology can be divided into two broad categories, transpersonal
development and transpersonal therapy, which will be addressed in
sequence.

Evidently, IYP is consonant with the central thesis of transpersonal
psychology that development proceeds from pre-personal, to personal, to
transpersonal levels (Walsh & Vaughan, 1993). However, because IYP
is theistic and views reincarnation as a fact, for IYP the development
of the psychic being (true soul) across multiple lives, and the outer
personality (ego, self) in one life, are two distinct yet interacting
trajectories of growth. Thus, one can find emotionally immature
children with well-developed psychic beings, as well as adults whose
psychic expression is inhibited by Axis I and II disorders, while much
of public life is organized by “generative” adults who are well-meaning
but may have less psychic sweetness than certain low-functioning
schizophrenics I have been privileged to meet. Such observations could
not arise if inner and outer development were invariably synchronized.

By the same token, psychic development does not erase or obviate the
normal sequence of outer development described by Erikson (Erikson,
1997), but rather heightens the spiritual consciousness brought to each
stage of the lifecycle. Wilber arrives at a similar conclusion about
childhood spirituality, but seems tentative, perhaps because he
discusses the issue as if all children had equal psychic (soul)
development (Wilber, 2000, pp. 139-42), while Sri Aurobindo and the
Mother observe that they do not.

At the same time, interactions routinely arise between the psychic
being and outer personality, some of which are reflected in Fowler’s
research on stages of faith development (Fowler, 1981). The most
pervasive example of this interaction effect is captured in the Western
construct of “ego strength,” which for IYP includes positive effects
the psychic being exerts on ego development and functioning. Thus, what
Sri Aurobindo and the Mother would call “highly psychisized”
personalities, such as Mother Teresa and the current Dalai Lama, score
extremely well on ego strength (GAF nearing 100) even though their
level of development is clearly post-egoic. In terms of IYP, such
transpersonal growth is possible precisely because the psychic being
(soul) is entirely real and can, through its direct link with the
Divine, bring to the outer being a deep source of psychological
strength and sustenance. Practically, this means the psychic being
(soul) has the power to transform ego functioning, even to heal
psychological wounds that seem
therapeutically unsolvable.

Conceptually, a simple way to operationalize IYP is to extend
vertically the well-known hierarchy of ego-defense mechanisms, so as to
append psychic (soul) processes of ego-transformation (Table 2). Thus,
whereas ego defense mechanisms deny, disguise, or distort
negative/painful/frightening psychological content so as to make it
more bearable, psychic (soul) “movements” accept such content unaltered
and work to transmute it. In between ego defense mechanisms and psychic
movements proper, stand the psychological capacities familiar to
dynamic psychotherapists as the observing ego and to
cognitive-behavioral therapists as cognitive skills of affect
regulation (these functions are dubbed “therapeutic movements” in Table
2). Epstein (1995) has lucidly explained how these functions can be
strengthened by Buddhist meditation practices, and the present author
has suggested elsewhere that such ego-transformational processes
mediate between soul and ego (Miovic, 2001, 2003, pp. 90-112).

Table 2. Hierarchy of Ego Functioning

I. Ego defense mechanisms (adapted from Vaillant, 1993)

Psychotic
Delusional projection
Denial
Distortion
Immature
Projection
Fantasy
Hypochondriasis
Passive aggression
Acting out
Dissociation
Intermediate (Neurotic)
Displacement
Isolation/Intellectualization
Repression
Reaction formation
Mature
Altruism
Sublimation
Suppression
Anticipation
Humor

II. Ego transformational processes

- Therapeutic movements
- Observing ego (e.g. “witnessing” in meditation, “sitting with affect” in therapy)
- Psychic (soul) movements
- Aspiration
- Surrender
- Rejection

Sri Aurobindo names and defines the psychic (soul) movements of
ego-transformation as follows. Aspiration is an inner invocation of and
yearning to feel the presence of the Divine and to manifest its
spiritual qualities in one’s life. By surrender he means to open
oneself entirely to that higher power and to it alone, and to let
oneself be a vehicle for its dictates. Rejection he defines as using
the psychic being’s discriminative tact to evaluate the source and
quality of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and to discard or
transform all that is false, weak, divisive, harmful, ego-centric, or
simply not conscious of the Divine (Aurobindo, 1999).

For both clients and therapists, it is critical not to confuse these
psychic (soul) movements with ego conflicts and deficits, or
unconscious drives and wishes (desires). “Surrender” here means to the
inner Divine as mediated via one’s own psychic being (soul), not to any
absolute human authority or the vulnerabilities of one’s own ego. True
spiritual practice requires the application of correct understanding
(insight), good judgment, willpower, and appropriate boundaries—all of
which are encompassed in Sri Aurobindo’s concept of “rejection.” Also,
true rejection proceeds directly from the soul, unlike suppression,
which is a psychological defense that involves trying to control
emotions with mental willpower (Miovic, 2001, 2003, pp. 90-112).

Finally, Sri Aurobindo and the Mother placed special emphasis on the
role of artistic endeavors in transpersonal development, as the
creative arts can be used as a field for learning to receive and
express inspiration from the inner being and higher planes of
consciousness. Sri Aurobindo’s commentaries on the spiritual sources of
poetic, literary, musical, and artistic inspiration are probably the
most insightful statements on the subject ever written (see Aurobindo,
1972b).

Implications: Transpersonal Therapy

In the 1930s, Sri Aurobindo criticized the early psychoanalytic
practice of rapidly raising the lower vital subconscious through
Oedipal interpretations (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 1605-6), and this has
led some to conclude incorrectly that he would be against contemporary
psychotherapy. On the contrary, psychoanalysis has evolved greatly
since the 1930s and is now generally in agreement with Sri Aurobindo’s
suggestion to strengthen ego functioning before delving into the
subconscious (Miovic, 2004; Mitchell & Black, 1995). Also, many
contemporary therapies (such as CBT, DBT, EMDR, interpersonal and
short-term models) avoid the subconscious entirely, or work at the
pre-conscious level and allow issues to emerge from the subconscious at
their own pace.

Thus, today one can say that the chief rationale for mental health
treatment from the perspective of IYP is that all manner of Axis I and
II issues engender much mental and vital (emotional) noise that
distracts one from spiritual practice offered calmly and quietly to the
Divine. In as much as IYP’s central strategy is to “quiet” the outer
being so that the psychic being can emerge, both psychotherapy and
psychotropic medications can be employed as tactical means to achieve
that strategic end. As a clinical framework, IYP is inclusive and
concurs with the many excellent insights and perspectives in the
Textbook of Transpersonal Psychiatry and Psychology (Scotton, Chinen,
& Battista, 1996). IYP would simply encourage all clinicians to
develop a clearer functional analysis of the planes of consciousness
and parts of the being involved in any given clinical presentation and
treatment modality, and of helping clients to grow in awareness of the
same.

IYP would, however, offer a few caveats for current transpersonal
practice to consider. First, although psychedelics, kundalini yoga, and
breathwork (called pranayama in yoga) can alter consciousness and
induce transpersonal experiences, these are all potentially dangerous
methods and even when done safely, they are either unnecessary or
incomplete in comparison to IYP’s method of opening to the psychic
being within and gradations of higher consciousness above. Second, it
is important to understand that classical meditation practice certainly
helps people develop a witnessing consciousness, but in order to
transform ego-functioning it is essential to find and evoke the psychic
being (evolving soul) as well. Third, understanding and dealing
effectively with the issue of hostile influence is the most difficult
problem a clinician can face, and is best avoided unless one truly has
the inner calling and spiritual protection needed to engage in such
work. Although possession and so-called alien abduction can lead
eventually to spiritual renewal (Lukoff, 1996; Mack 1994), clinicians
would be wise not enter this territory naively.

More specifically, Sri Aurobindo interprets many cases of psychosis and
epilepsy as due to the interaction among hostile vital beings who
invade or possess the individual, psychological issues that invite such
attacks (such as narcissistic and histrionic tendencies), and
underlying physical brain defects (whether genetic or acquired)that
permit and perpetuate the condition(s). However, Sri Aurobindo also
recognizes that some cases of psychosis and epilepsy may be purely
organic, as is the medical condition of delirium (Aurobindo, 1970a, pp.
1768-1775). Importantly, Sri Aurobindo and the Mother observed that
hostile vital beings are polymorphic in nature and can manifest
themselves in various forms, according to the mental schema of
different times and cultures. Thus, the demons and devils of old and
the inimical space aliens of today are related phenomenon that involve
the same hostile forces that have been plaguing humanity since its
beginning. Mack (1994) entertains this possibility in his seminal work
on alien abduction, but his discussion would have benefited from IYP’s
consciousness perspective.

For example, I once had a Haitian patient with affective psychosis who
presented with vivid descriptions of being attacked and possessed by a
voodoo spirit. Later in treatment, she spontaneously reported an
episode of “alien abduction” during which her “soul” (actually either
subtle physical or inner vital in IYP terms) was lifted up into a UFO
and experimented upon. Notably, she described this frightening event in
purely supra-physical terms, probably because her cultural acceptance
of voodoo spirits allowed her not to translate this powerful subtle
experience into solely physical terms, as many contemporary
Euro-Americans are prone to do because they lack non-materialist
explanatory models. Basu recently presented a paper on IYP’s approach
to possession and psychosis at the World Psychiatric Congress, with
compelling case studies (Basu, 2004).

Finally, transpersonal clinicians need not disparage synthetic
psychotropic medications, because they are useful treatment tools and
are backed by the rational methodology of science, which is itself a
considerable progressive force put forward by the Divine to aid in the
evolution of consciousness on earth. Nonetheless, there is hope that
ongoing work with flower remedies (as in Bach and other flower
essences) based on the Mother’s extensive insights into the
psycho-spiritual qualities of flowers (Mother, 2000), will lead
eventually to reliable supra-rational methods of psychopharmacology to
complement rational ones (Vandana, 1998; Miovic, 2003, pp. 133-160;
Basu, personal communication, 2004)

Conclusion

This article has presented an overview of Sri Aurobindo’s cosmology of
consciousness and Integral Yoga Psychology (IYP). Because the scope of
IYP is vast, this essay has compressed many topics into a short space
in order to show how IYP interprets the central relationships among
metaphysics, transpersonal psychology, and clinical practice. In
summary, IYP agrees with the general model of transpersonal psychology
and psychiatry, but would expand and refine current understandings in a
few areas. The most important of these are distinguishing between
spiritual liberation and transformation; recognizing the existence and
function of the psychic being; differentiating the parts of the inner
being and various overhead planes of consciousness; and holding open
the possibility of a supramental evolution of life in the future.
Clinically, IYP offers novel approaches to avoiding spiritual
“emergencies,” dealing with past-life memories, distinguishing between
the subliminal being and the subconscious, and conceptualizing cases of
hostile influence and possession.

[TABLE 1 ATTACHED]

Note:
This article appears in the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 2005,
Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 111-133. Copyright belongs to the JTP.

Table 1. The Inner Being
(based on Aurobindo, 1970a, pp. 328-9, 334-8, 364-77)

- Chakra Sahasradala Thousand-petalled lotus; top of head; blue with gold light
- Ajna Forehead; two petals; white
- Visuddha
- Throat region; sixteen petals; grey
- Hrtpadma or Anahata Sternal region; twelve petals; golden pink
- Chaitya purusha, not a chakra per se and not emphasized in older yogas]
- Nabhipadma or Manipura Region from heart to navel; ten petals, violet
- Svadhisthana Between the navel and base of spine; six petals; deep purple red
- Muladhara Base of spine; four petals; red

Sri Aurobindo’s Description

- Higher Mind,
- Illumined Mind: Commands the higher thinking mind (buddhi) and the
illumined mind, and opens upwards towards the intuitive mind and
Overmind.
- Dynamic Mind: Commands thought, will, vision, inner mental formation. “Third eye.”
- Externalizing Mind: Commands expression and externalization of all
mental movements and forces; also called physical mind when it gives a
mental order to external things and deals with them practically.
Different from other gradations of consciousness associated with the
face, neck, throat, and upper sternal
region that have no specific chakra:
- Mechanical Mind (Mental Physical): Repeats customary ideas and habits endlessly, strong in childhood.
- Vital Mind: Involved primarily in dreaming, imagining, planning for
the future (e.g., fantasies of greatness, happiness, wealth, fame,
heroism, etc).
- Mental Vital: Gives mental expression to vital movements such as
emotion, desire, passion, and nervous sensations. Through this avenue
vital movements can rise up and cloud or distort reasoning (e.g.,
rationalization).
- Emotional Mind and Higher Vita: : Perceived as more external; seat of
various feelings, such as love, joy, sorrow, hatred, affection, etc.
The “heart” chakra.
- Inner Heart (Psychic Being): Perceived as deep inside center of
chest; the evolving soul that grows from life to life and is the seat
of true individual identity.
- Central Vital: Seat of the stronger vital longings and reactions,
e.g., ambition, pride, fear, love of fame, attractions and repulsions,
desires and passions,
life-forces and life-energies.
- Lower Vital: Connects all centers above with the physical
consciousness below, and is concerned with small desires, such as for
food and sex, as well as small likings and dislikings, such as vanity,
quarrels, love of praise, anger at blame, little wishes.
- Physical Consciousness: Governs the physical being down to the
subconscious. The physical, when not transformed, is prone to inertia,
ignorance, repetition of habits, slowness, resistance to spiritual
consciousness. The subconscious has no organized chakra, but arises
from below the feet.

References

Aurobindo, S. (1999). The mother. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust: 1-14.

Aurobindo, S. (1972a). The teaching of Sri Aurobindo. In: Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library (Vol. 26, pp. 95-97). Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Aurobindo, S. (1970a). Letters on yoga. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Aurobindo, S. (1970b). The life divine. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Aurobindo, S. (1970c). The human cycle, the ideal of human unity, war and self-determination. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Aurobindo, S. (1971). The mind of light. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co, Inc.

Aurobindo, S. (1972b). The future poetry and letters on poetry, literature and art. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Battista, J.R. (1996). Offensive spirituality and spiritual defenses. In
B.W. Scotton, A.B. Chinen, & J.R. Battista (Eds.). Textbook of
transpersonal psychiatry and psychology (pp. 250-60). New York:
BasicBooks.

Basu, S. (2000). Integral health. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Basu, S. (2004). Occultism and psychiatry: Implications in clinical practice. Journal of the World Psychiatric Association, 3(1), 194.

Braud, W. (2000). Wellness implications of retroactive intentional influence: Exploring an outrageous hypothesis. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 6(1), 37-48.

Bucke, R.M. (1969). Cosmic consciousness. New York: E.P. Dutton.

Chaudhuri, H. (1965). Integral yoga: The concept of harmonious and creative living. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Cornelissen, M. (2001). Consciousness and its transformation. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education.

Cornelissen, M., & Joshi, K. (2004). Consciousness, Indian psychology, and yoga. New Delhi: Centre for the Study of Civilizations & Joshi, K. (2004).

Cornelissen, M., Dalal, A.K., & Rao, R. (In press). Handbook o f Indian psychology. Cortright, B. (1997). Psychotherapy and spirit: Theory and practice in transpersonal psychotherapy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Cortright, B. (2001). Integral psychotherapy as existential Vedanta.
In M. Cornelissen (Ed.). Consciousness and its transformation (pp.
65-79). Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education.

Cortright, B., Kahn M., & Hess, J. (2003). Speaking from the heart: Integral T-groups as a tool for training transpersonal psychotherapists. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 35(2), 127-142.

Dalal, A.S. (2001a). A greater psychology: An introduction to Sri Aurobindo’s psychological thought. San Francisco: J. P. Tarcher.

Dalal, A.S. (2001b). Psychology, mental health, and yoga. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Press.

Epstein, M. (1995). Thoughts without a thinker. New York: Basic Books.

Erikson, E.H. (1997). The life cycle completed, extended version. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Fowler, J.W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. New York: Harper Collins.

Heehs, P. (1989). Sri Aurobindo: A brief biography. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jue, R.W. (1996). Past-life therapy.
In B.W. Scotton, A.B. Chinen, & J.R. Battista (Eds.). Textbook of
transpersonal psychiatry and psychology (pp. 377-87). New York: Basic
Books.

Jung, C.G., & Jaffe, A. (Ed.) (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Random House.

Lithman, A.S. (2003). An evolutionary agenda for the third millennium: A primer for the mutation of consciousness. Ashland: White Cloud Press.

Lukoff, D. (1996). Transpersonal psychotherapy with psychotic disorders and spiritual emergencies with psychotic features. In B.W. Scotton, A.B.

Chinen, & J.R. Battista (Eds.). Textbook of transpersonal psychiatry and psychology (pp. 271-81). New York: Basic Books.

Mack, J.E. (1994). Abduction: Human encounters with aliens. New York: Scribner.

McLynn, F. (1996). Carl Gustav Jung: A biography. New York: St. Martin’s Press: 398-415, 459-509.

Miovic, M. (2001). Towards a spiritual psychology: Bridging psychodynamic psychotherapy with integral yoga.
In M. Cornelissen (Ed.). Consciousness and its transformation (pp.
98-119). Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education.

Miovic, M. (2003). Initiation: Spiritual insights on life, art, and psychology. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Society.

Miovic, M. (2004). An introduction to spiritual psychology: Overview of the literature, East and West. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12(2), 105-115.

Mitchell, S.A., & Black, M.J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. New York: BasicBooks.

Mother (2000). The spiritual significance of flowers. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust.

Murphy, M. (1992). The future of the body: Explorations into the further evolution of human nature. New York: J. P. Tarcher.

Newberg, A., & d’Aquili, E (1998). The neuropsychology of spiritual experience. In: H.G. Koenig (Ed.). Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 76-94). San Diego: Academic Press.

Newberg, A & d’Aquili, E (2001). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of belief. New York: Ballantine.

Nirodbaran (1972). Twelve years with Sri Aurobindo. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust: 128-69.

Parsons, W.B. (1999). The enigma of the oceanic feeling. New York: Oxford University Press.

Radhakrishnan S., & Moore, C. A. (Eds.) (1957). A source book in Indian philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 575-609.

Rao, K.R. (2002). Consciousness studies: Cross-cultural perspectives. London: McFarland & Company.

Scotton, B.W., Chinen, A.B., & Battista J.R., (Eds.). (1996). Textbook of transpersonal psychiatry and psychology. New York: Basic Books.

Sen, I. (1986). Integral psychology: The psychological system of Sri Aurobindo. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education.

Taylor, E.I. (1999). Shadow culture: Psychology and spirituality in America. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.

Vaillant, G.E. (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: 36-37,118-174.

Vandana (1998). Flower remedies based on the significances given to flowers by the Mother. NAMAH, 6(1), 9-26.

Van Vrekhem, G. (1998). Beyond the human species: The life and work of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother. New York: Paragon House Publishers.

Van Vrekhem, G. (2000). The mother: The story of her life. New Delhi: HarperCollins.

Vrinte, J. (1995). The concept of personality in Sri Aurobindo’s integral yoga psychology and A. Maslow’s humanistic / transpersonal psychology. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Ltd.

Vrinte, J. (1996). The quest for the inner man: Transpersonal psychotherapy and integral sadhana. Pondicherry: Sri Mira Trust.

Vrinte, J. (2002). The perennial
quest for a psychology with a soul: An inquiry into the relevance of
Sri Aurobindo’s metaphysical yoga psychology in the context of Ken
Wilber’s integral psychology.
Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Ltd.

Walsh, R., & Vaughan, F. (Eds.) (1993). Paths beyond ego: The transpersonal vision. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher.

Weiss, B. (1992). Through time into healing: How past life regression therapy can heal mind, body, and soul. London: Judy Publishers Ltd.

Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Boston: Shambhala Publications Inc.

Transcript of Matthijs Cornelissen: Sri Aurobindo’s Theory of Knowledge (Port Townsend WA 2005)

Transcript of Matthijs’ AUM2005 talk: “Sri Aurobindo’s Theory of Knowledge”

Talk by Matthijs Cornelissen
Port Townsend, WA
June 11, 2005

Good Morning,

Why do we think we know?

What I want to discuss this morning is something that underlies what we
have discussed the previous two days and I hope that together we can go
to a greater depth and get into some of the absolute mystery that is
behind everything that we do and say. It is a mystery, and this is
another embarrassment of speaking, because we know much less than we
think. I guess I should talk only about myself, but I think it applies
to all of us. We think we know, and this naïve certainty that we can
know things is really amazing. We are supposed to make a link with
science and even science has this. Science as we now know it is to
quite an extent based on the philosophy of Descartes and Descartes is
much maligned; but actually he was an amazingly naïve and religious
man. What everybody knows is that he said “‘Cogito ergo sum”, i.e. “I
think, therefore I am” and of course everybody who knows a little about
Yoga knows that you can very well be without thinking, and that your
real existence has nothing to do with your thought. So we tend to look
down on him, but what’s most amazing is not that famous sentence, it is
one that follows a little later. His attempt was to start with absolute
doubt and then find out what would stand as certain knowledge. The
first thing he could not doubt was his own thinking. But even when he
looked outside, his doubt didn’t go very deep. When he divided the
world into two, the inner, thinking part that was to be looked after by
religion and the outer, extended part that was to be studied by
science, even for the science part, his doubt really didnt go further
than the first step. He said, all I can build upon is what the senses
give me, and then he added that the senses could not be wrong “because
God has given them to us and God cannot be that malicious that he would
give us false witnesses.” I think that’s really touching and so
incredibly naïve. The later existentialists doubted on a much deeper,
more psychological level, but even they didnt doubt very deep, because
they still took the outer existence as fully real. And of course they
took themselves far too serious.

Some ancient Indians like Nagarjuna and some Western mystics like
Eckhart carried their doubts much further. And they came to a space
where any expression became doubtful and needed to be transcended by
something higher that was inexpressible. But still that something
higher was there. So it appears that in the last instance we cannot
doubt for the full hundred percent. We always assert something and even
if we pretend to doubt fully, then we don’t doubt our doubt. So we
cannot escape some certainty at the very root of everything, even at
the very root of nothing, even Buddha’s emptiness is still a pregnant
void. We simply cannot escape having somewhere deep inside a certainty.
I have always found it very amazing that speakers, even in a group like
ours, who know that Reality is far beyond us, still all talk as if they
know, me included. I’m saying something, because I believe in it. So
that’s very, very strange.

I am very puzzled about what really is and I think collectively, we are
not remotely puzzled enough about that. Especially Science is still
living in an amazing, almost childish world of make-belief, in which we
presume that the physical reality is real, and more or less as we see
it. It proceeds as if it is sufficient to polish a little bit the
obvious defects of our senses, expand them with machinery and
equipment, and then go a bit deeper in on their interrelationships, and
then that’s it. And it is true that the models science makes of reality
are sufficient to make the gadgets we all love so much work. But it
doesn’t bring us much closer to the deeper answers to the questions of
life. The social sciences have detected the social pressures that
influence our thinking, and they do try to get at the truth behind
those pressures, but this also remains entirely on the surface.

One can wonder why it is like that. Why do we always think that we
know? and why can we not escape this tendency? Within the Indian
tradition, this amazing certitude even at every level of ignorance, is
perfectly understandable, because it follows, as so many things in
psychology, directly from the concept of Sachchidananda. Absolutely at
the very root of things, being and knowing, and joy of course, are
essentially one. So essentially we know what we are and we are what we
know. There can be no gap between the two. We are our own
consciousness, we are our own knowledge, however limited and ignorant
it is. This is the pervasive presence even in all other types of
knowledge of the special type of knowledge, which Sri Aurobindo calls
knowledge by identity.

Knowledge by identity, if you really begin to take it seriously and
begin to understand all its implications, is an absolutely fantastic
concept. Especially if you combine it with Sri Aurobindo’s insight in
the evolution of consciousness, and with the old Indian idea of many
levels and types of consciousness, arranged in layers and patterns
between the surface and the inner most psychic being.

The constructed reality of the sense-mind
So let’s see how that goes. This may seem a little bit of sidetrack,
but if you look at Patanjali’s Yoga sutras, you see that the central
point of his whole system is the need to silence the mind. Silencing
the mind is for him the very definition of yoga. Sri Aurobindo stresses
the need to silence the mind as the very first step of yoga. But how do
you do it? There are two big enemies that prevent us from silencing our
mind. The first are the desires that come up and keep us continuously
busy, and the other are our senses.

When I started with yoga many years ago, I found this very surprising.
Desire I could understand. Desire obviously corrupts: when we like
something we want to hear that alone, we don’t want to hear the other
side, and when desire enters into a discussion, we begin to worry who
wins the argument, not who is actually right. So that desires corrupt
our thinking is very obvious, but why would the senses corrupt it? The
senses at their best make us see beauty, and beauty is very close to
truth, and what about systems like some forms of Zen Buddhism which are
entirely based on sharpening the senses. So I wondered why in the
Indian tradition so much is made of the need to get rid of the senses.
Once one understands Sri Aurobindo’s theory of knowledge, it becomes
very clear why our senses are a problem, and one realises it has
nothing to do with disdain for beauty, on the contrary, but it has
everything to do with the possibility of cultivating knowledge by
identity.

To put it very simply, our problem is that our consciousness is
entrapped in the workings of our sense-mind, and our sense-mind is
entrapped in the workings of our brain. To get back to the infinite
consciousness, which we actually are in our essence, we have to free
our consciousness from these entanglements. This is simple enough, but
to understand fully, not only how to get out, but also why we got
entrapped in the first place, and what might happen after we have
liberated ourselves, what the next step could be, that gets quite
complicated. The best way to sort all that out, is probably to look at
the whole thing in the framework of the evolution of consciousness. I
think all of us as we are sitting here are fairly familiar with Sri
Aurobindo’s concept of consciousness so I can just indicate it very
shortly and simply.

The typal planes
Sri Aurobindo says, in line with the entire Vedic tradition, that this
physical world is the end result of a process of exclusive
concentration by which the Divine manifests the physical world out of
himself. On the way from the absolute, indeterminate, infinite,
omniscient and all-powerful divine Consciousness to the almost totally
inconscient and fully determinate state of physical hard matter, a
whole series of intermediate typal planes of conscious existence are
created. Science ignores all these intermediate planes (except perhaps
one specific layer of the mental worlds which contains the descriptions
of a certain class of physical relations and processes). Science deals
only with the ultimate end result of that whole process of immersion of
the Infinite Brahman into inconscience, matter, and so it studies the
physical world which is made out of fundamental particles like, for
example, the electrons that circle around in atoms.

Of course these are metaphors. We should not at any moment think that
matter really consists of electrons and protons and things like that.
An electron is our human conception, our human model, of a part of the
material world. There are no such things in reality. Electrons,
protons, quarks, and so on are part of our image of reality, just like
everything else that we see is a construct of our manas, our
sense-mind. Nothing is as it seems to be.

We are so trapped in our sense-mind that we inevitably think that the
physical reality we see and feel consists of real stuff, while all that
we see as real stuff “out there” is at least partially the product of
our mind, it is the result of an interaction between what is out there
and our imagination about it. We really live in a virtual world of our
own making that is to some extent guided by the world out there, and to
some extent by our own pre-knowledge, or prejudice, of how that world
should be. It is not an entirely virtual world, there’s something out
there, but it is certainly not exactly that what we see. What we see is
our construction of reality, which is always an interaction of at least
two different types of consciousness and being, the conscious being of
ourselves as the observer, and the conscious being of what we observe.
These interactions create entirely different worlds depending on the
type of conscious being, which is there in the observing self and in
the observed nature.

I think this is something we lose track of, because we get habituated
to live in a certain manner, in a certain type of consciousness, and
then we start taking that manner absolutely seriously, but it’s
arbitrary, the worlds in which we live are the way they are, because we
are habituated to construct them that way and we can be shaken out of
them. By music, by meditation, by an encounter, by grief, by all kinds
of things, we can be shaken out of those habits. And suddenly we are in
an entirely different space.

From matter to mind
Now to come back to that electron and proton, let’s presume that the
world is more or less like scientists model it. Then there are things
called electrons, or at least wave-forms that can be considered as
little particles, that circle around protons. So those little “things”
must have some kind of built in knowledge. Everything must have. The
electron must know how to do its thing, just like we must know how to
walk, how to ride a cycle, digest food, etc. Riding a cycle is a very
good example, because to ride a cycle goes differently than most people
think. We think that we go to the left by turning the steering handle
to the left, but it doesn’t work like that. You go to the left by
shifting your weight to the left, and then, because the fork of the
front wheel is a little bent forward, this shift of weight makes you
turn left. If you try to force the steering handle left while staying
straight-up, you will fall, as all children know who ever had enough
courage, will-power (and folly) to try. So the body knows how to do it,
while our mind doesn’t know.

In a similar way as the body must know how to ride a cycle, one can
imagine that the electron must know how to turn around the proton.
Obviously it doesn’t have the type of mental knowledge that we have of
the outer world, but it has all the necessary know-how to play its
specific role in this huge world. In this context it is useful to note
that there is actually no substantial difference between a quality and
know-how: one can say that this paper is white, describing its
whiteness as a quality, or one can say that this paper has the know-how
needed to emit white light. One sounds more active and human than the
other but it comes to the same thing. So we can describe the quality of
whiteness in this paper as a kind of consciousness that involves a
certain “know-how-to-be-white”, a certain knowledge of how to be. At
the level of the physical, the consciousness is entirely involved in
its own action and in an electron the type of physical consciousness it
has, or rather is, is not more than a specific habit of form. The
electron we can presume, doesn’t go out of its way to make a model of
the world in order to decide on its action, it just is its own action.
For our type of representational knowledge, we need our sense mind, our
fantastically complicated brain and so on. All that is not there in the
electron. The electron is far too simple for all that, but, and this is
terribly interesting, what little bit it knows, it knows perfectly.
This many people have mentioned before. Matter doesn’t lie, it doesn’t
make mistakes. It doesn’t have that capacity, because it just is. Even
our body just is. It cannot pretend to be something else.

Similarly, our body-consciousness also cannot go out of itself and then
make a model of itself and then deal with that model, it just does
something, or just is something. It simply is. That it has in common
with very simple things like electrons and protons. Now let us see how
the ability to respond to the surrounding gets more complicated as
things become more complex during the process of evolution. Even
electrons have the ability to react to what happens in their
surrounding. When another atom comes nearby, an electron may jump to
another orbit, so the electron reacts to some extent to its
surrounding. Even when the electron is simply racing around the nucleus
of the atom in which it “lives”, it is doing that, because it somehow
senses the presence of the protons and other electrons there and knows
how to behave accordingly, all according to its fixed habits.

As the physical aggregates get more complicated, you get plants, which
have very intricate and subtle interactions with their surroundings.
The tree moves with the wind, it breathes in some chemicals from the
air, it pulls up some chemicals through its roots, it breathes out
other chemicals; it has some very subtle and complicated interactions
going on with other plants, with the air, with the soil and so on. But
basically it is in itself. There is no reason at all to presume that
the tree makes any internal representation of what’s going on around
it. It knows only what it feels directly, and in that sense it is very
similar to our vital nature. That is probably why in the Vedic system
of classification, which Sri Aurobindo follows, the plants belong to
the life world just as our emotions. Emotions also belong to the
pranamaya kosha, to the life world, because in our emotions also we
don’t make a model of the outside world, we don’t have an objective
conception of how the world is. We react directly; it consists of
horizontal I and thou kind of relationships. Our reactions to someone
else can be very subtle, very complicated, but they are not objective
like the mind is. It is direct, in and out.

Making maps
The objective mind becomes possible when our brain-stuff becomes so
complex that it can make some kind of a map of the world around it. Our
brain is capable of making a hugely complicated representation of the
reality in which our organism lives. Of course it is not a map in the
sense of the 2D printed maps you can buy of different geographical
regions, it is also not a purely verbal map. It is something very, very
complex consisting of spatial relationships, smells, sounds, meanings,
intentions, reactions, all kind of things.

There area few things that are good to note at this stage. The visual
aspect takes up a very large part of our mapping of the world but it is
certainly not the whole of it. It is also good to realize that
perception is a very active process. Young children generally think,
like the ancient Greeks and Indians, that when we see something, a ray
goes out from the eye, envelopes the thing, takes its shape and
returns. Since the 13th century in Europe this “emissive theory of
sight” has lost out on the “immissive” theory, and primary school
teachers teach children now that nothing goes out from the eyes and
that “in reality” the light from the object falls on our retina, which
passively absorbs that light and as a result gives off a signal that
goes straight into the brain where we become conscious of it. (How
exactly consciousness comes in at this stage, is hard, perhaps
impossible to explain in this scheme of things, but that the teacher of
course does not betray.) Though there is some truth in what the teacher
says, it is only part of the story and in some respects her version is
worse than the child’s. The reason for this is that seeing is not a
passive process at all. Modern psychology is becoming more and more
aware of the extent to which seeing, and sensing in general, are active
processes. What we see, is to a very high degree determined by what we
want to see, or what we expect to see, or fear to see, but in any case,
by some kind of mental set that is determined at least partially from
inside. Even purely physiologically, seeing is a very active process.
The main centre in the brain where we do our visual imaging of the
world has more efferent neurons coming from the back, from the deeper
layers of the brain, going out, than it has afferent neurons that come
from the eye and go in. Perhaps the full story is something like this
that first our consciousness goes, as the ancients and children say,
out to the object, and negotiates with the consciousness in the object
what kind of information it will receive from it, somewhat like a
fax-machine which first negotiates with the fax-machine on the other
side of the telephone line what the highest protocol is that both
machines can understand, before the real transmission starts. The
object then sends that kind of information out and the organism
receives it: the purely physical mind gets only physical info, the
psychic gets the emotional values attached to the object, the artist
its beauty, the mystic the divine presence in its core.

For simplicity’s sake, let us for now focus on the idea that our brain
makes a map of reality, because that it does that, in some fashion or
another, seems clear enough. Someone has claimed that it can do that
because the number of connections in the brain, — there are billions
and billions and billions of neuron cells, and billions and billions
and billions and billions and more billions of connections between
them, — because the number of connections between our brain-cells is
about the same as the number of events that have taken place in the
universe till now. How anyone could make a guess of the number of
events in the universe, I don’t know, but what is sure is that the
numbers of neuronal connections are absolutely staggering, and that all
this complexity has been squeezed in these little skulls of ours is
absolutely incredible. Because of that complexity, we can make quite
sophisticated maps of reality, we can calculate the beginning of the
universe, construct mobiles, write poetry, make music, and maintain
human relationships. We can do things that are actually incredibly
complicated. But there is another fascinating aspect to this.

The universe in a speck of dust
When we look at ourselves from the outside, “objectively”, we see
ourselves as small 5-6 foot high, 60, 70 kilograms creatures on a tiny
planet in a medium size solar system, in a small milky away, somewhere
in a corner of this enormous universe. But on the other hand, it’s we
who see it like that. So if we look at things in another way, stressing
the subjective aspect, then we can say that this whole universe takes
up just one thought in our consciousness, the universe happens
somewhere in a corner of our being. And that’s true for every one of
us. We all can think of the universe, as if it were just one of our
many possible thoughts, which is absolutely fantastic. Are we inside
that, or is that inside us? There is no way to decide. Now there is
nothing special about this idea. Every twelve-year-old who takes his
own thinking a bit seriously discovers this problem at some stage, gets
worked up about it for a while and then drops it on his pile of
unsolved riddles of existence, and gets on with life.

The fascinating point is, at least for those of us who manage to remain
forever like twelve-year-olds, that something very similar must be true
for every thing in the universe. However little the speck of dust we
take, if we turn it inside out, it shows the entire universe hiding
within it. Mystics have of course always said so. Mystics say not only
that everything is conscious, but also that they can see The Divine in
absolutely everything, in big things, in small things, everywhere. In
“God’s Labour”, Sri Aurobindo describes how the supramental is there,
hidden deep inside matter. To our ordinary mind this sounds quite
unbelievable, but then, even for the ordinary mind one can make it at
least somewhat plausible. If we take the electron as our example, the
logic runs like this:

The electron obviously does not have a mind like we have. It misses the
billions upon billions of cross-connected neurons needed to make
representational maps of reality in the way we do. And yet, in some
other way, each electron must contain in itself all the knowledge of
the universe. And this has to be so, even in a very technical pragmatic
sense. The reason for this astonishing aspect of reality is, that if an
electron wants to move exactly in the right way, which is what it does,
it must know everything: it must know all of physics because all the
laws of physics form one integrated web and you cannot understand any
part really completely, without knowing all of it. It is clear that it
must know all about electromagnetism, as its orbit is mainly determined
by electromagnetic forces, but gravity also plays a role, and so do so
many other forces. Physicists presume that even if we don’t always know
exactly how, in reality all physical laws should be interconnected and
ultimately derivable form just a few basic elements. And the electron
must know whatever laws are there completely because it never makes
errors. One of the most basic elements of physics is that if we see
something behave erratically, the fault is always ours: we haven’t
fully understood what is going on. Anyhow, in a similar way our
tiny-winy electron must know all of the world, because the whole
surrounding world impacts on it. According to physics there is no limit
to influences. If there is a force, the effect of the force becomes
smaller at a distance, but it does go on and on, in however small a
degree, right to the borders of the universe. So everything influences
everything. If our electron would miss out on even a tiny detail of
either type of knowledge, it would not move correctly. So if the
electron is to move exactly right, which is what it does, then it
should know the whole lot of it, in however and implicit manner. And so
for an electron to move exactly as it does, it must know everything,
point. Obviously not in the way we know, but the knowledge must be
there in some implicit way.

There is sill a second angle to this. Earlier, we saw that we can look
at qualities as know-how, and vice versa. This is the active side of
knowledge. But there is also a passive side to knowledge. If you look
at the knowledge available in a system, you can always look at in two
ways. One is the dynamic knowledge, the know-how that the system needs
to act according to its svadharma, and the other is the information
that’s passively present in it, and which we could extract out of it if
we would take the trouble. For the same reason that the electron must
have all the dynamic know-how in the world, it must also have all the
passive information about the universe inside.

An example on a slightly bigger scale will make this clearer. A glass
of water knows in some way how high it is located above the sea level.
The simple reason for this is that I can extract that knowledge out of
it: I can boil the water in the glass and measure the temperature at
which it starts boiling, and from that temperature I can calculate its
height above sea-level. At sea-level it boils at 100 °C, but if I take
it 10km up, it may start boiling at 70 degree, or whatever it is. The
temperature at which the water boils can tell me how high it is above
sea-level. So in some implicit way the information about its height
above the earth’s surface must be hidden in each cup of water. In a
similar way, it must contain the speed by which the earth moves around
the sun, for again, if I want to know how fast the earth turns around
the sun, I can in principle measure the speed of this glass of water
and derive the speed of the earth from there. All the basic information
about the solar system must be in there in the glass, because I can
take it out from there. In principle, certainly not in practice, but in
principle, I can study everything in the universe by studying this one
glass of water. And as everything impinges on it, it must in some way
have the effect of everything embedded in it.

As this may seem at first sight quite an outrageous idea, it should be
possible to raise loads of objections against this reasoning, but in
the end I have the feeling that it should be possible to deal with all
these objections, for intuitively, it actually does makes sense that
all the know-how and all the information in the universe, must be
present in each little part of it. Many mystics have said so, and the
idea that deep, deep within the omniscient omnipotent Divine is
secretly present in each little bit of matter is a deeply satisfying
thought.

Maps and the brain
Now let’s see how this works out in bigger things. In a cup, it is
still very much like in the electron. Implicitly, non-manifestly, all
knowledge must be there in the cup; explicitly, manifestly, there is
only a certain habit of form: the only thing the cup knows actively, in
a physically manifest way, is how to remain this particular cup under a
certain set of circumstances. If it gets too hard a knock, it cannot
maintain its form and breaks. One may wonder what happens to its habit
of form, once the physical cup has been ground back into dust. It seems
plausible to me that the habit of form remains, if not forever then
still for a possibly long time after the physical cup has gone. The
reason is that the accident that broke the physical cup, did not
destroy the habit as such, it only prevented one specific manifestation
of it to stick together. Whether this is true or not is in principle
very well testable. Sheldrake has done wonderful work in the related
area of “morphogenetic fields”, and if interest in such things
increases, we can expect much more of this type of research in the
future.

Now what happens at our level of complexity? We have this fantastic
brain, which is continuously busy, on the one hand to help maintain law
and order within the complexity of our organism, and on the other hand
to plan and execute external action, which involves maintaining a
tremendously complex database about the outer reality, which we will
call for shortness sake our map of the world around us. It does this in
millions of ways, one of them consists of complicated word schemes like
the one I’m brewing now, and by which your poor mind is being
beleaguered when you hear or read this.

The interesting thing is that just like the electron is the electron,
infinite inside but on the outside limited to being electron-like, and
just as the cup is inside the Infinite, and yet on the outside only
busy manifesting its specific form of cuppiness, so we are infinite
inside, but on the outside we are a peculiar mixture of a basic
body-sense, feelings, volitions, intentions, thoughts, memories, plans
and what not that seem to be engendered by our brain on the basis of
the millions of inputs that reach it at any given moment. In our
ordinary physical consciousness, our consciousness simply aligns with
whatever the body-embedded mind does, or perhaps rather, as all the
mind does is far too complicated, it aligns with a tiny “executive
summary” which the mind regularly sends to its own surface. And in its
turn, what the mind does in our ordinary physical state is largely what
the brain and the rest of the nervous system do, and our consciousness
is thus still embedded in a little chunk of matter, even though that
chunk of matter is fabulously complicated and capable of “mapping”, or
presenting the world around it.

Beyond the maps
Now the fascinating thing is that at this stage in our evolution, we
cannot only make an objective map of ourselves and the world around us,
but we can also free ourselves from the sense mind, just enough to open
up to some environmental influence, as in telepathy, or even, and there
it gets really interesting, to enter a state of pure consciousness. The
latter especially is not so easy, because the attachment to the
sense-mind is an old habit that comes from our evolutionary past. So by
habit we identify with our nervous system, or more accurately, with a
tiny surface summary of the billions of mental processes that take
place in our brain-based sense-mind, but it is not by necessity so, we
have the capacity to refuse our thoughts, to throw out anything that’s
not absolute, to quieten the mind and to enter into an absolute
silence. Mystics of all times and cultures have done that, and if one
really puts oneself to it, it can be done. There is the famous
description of how Sri Aurobindo silenced his mind; most people take
slightly longer, but in principle it’s something that can be done and
many people have reached a state where at least for sometime, when they
look inside, there’s nothing but a wide open inner space. This is
something that can be done. Most people, when they begin to look
inside, see an endless flow of useless thoughts popping up
continuously, but it’s not necessarily so. There can be quiet.

In many esoteric traditions this seems to be the main aim, to get out
of the web in which the ordinary consciousness is caught, so that one’s
consciousness is not tied any longer to the small map that our body
makes of the reality around it, and to reach a kind of absolute inner
freedom. At this stage many interesting questions can be asked. The
main question is perhaps why a consciousness without content brings
with it such an overwhelming sense of liberation, of having reached the
Absolute, the Truth, or even The Divine. But our immediate aim in this
talk is something much more mundane, and perhaps more immediately
practical, and we will concentrate on that. The topic of this talk is
knowledge and our immediate next question is what the relation is
between this fully automatic, brain-based map-making business, silence
of mind, and knowledge?

Now it gets very interesting. We know how to make these maps. Because
we do it all the time, and in our ordinary consciousness we identify
with our map of reality, and we know also that we can get out of maps
altogether in some absolute silence of mind. Now what is knowledge in
this context?

What is knowledge?
When people talk about the increase in scientific knowledge, or about
the knowledge society, what do they mean by knowledge? It seems to me
that much of what we nowadays take for knowledge is at best a poor
symbolic reflection of what people used to mean by knowledge.

The confusion probably began when we started writing. Think of a book
with a story. What is this book, is it a bound pile of paper with ink
dotted all over it in the form of letters, is it the long string of
words formed by those letters, or is it the story that somehow got
caught in those words and that will remain hidden forever in the
patterns of the ink on the paper unless someone reads the book? Does
Hamlet exist only in patterns of ink on paper, does he come into
existence for as long as someone somewhere reads or watches the play,
or is he part of a story that exists in itself, in its own realm of
stories, quite independent of individual books and human minds? It
appears quite obvious to me that the essence of the book is not the
paper but the story printed on it, and that this story exists in its
own realm and is only reflected, imprisoned in the letters that are
printed on paper. In other words, I’m inclined to think that once
created, Hamlet does exist quite independent of printed books and human
minds thinking of him.

Since stories got printed, and thousand times more so since computers
can process the digital rendering of information, we are getting
increasingly confused between maps and the reality they represent. We
make a presentation of reality, and then we somehow think that that map
is the reality. And then we say that we can store knowledge in
libraries, computer disks, and the internet. This is total confusion,
because it is not the knowledge that is stored. Computers don’t process
knowledge. They process bits, they process electrical current. It is we
who give the meaning to the patterns they store and process. It is we
who put meaning in, it is we who get it transformed in some material
substrate according to rules we have made, and it is we who take the
meaning out. The meaning is in our consciousness, the meaning is not in
the computer. Someone gave the good example of a thermometer. The
thermometer doesn’t measure the temperature. It is we who measure the
temperature by looking at the thermometer. Computers are far more
complex, they process patterns of electrical currents that represent
information, but it is only in us that the streams of information
finally turn into knowledge. Now it’s conceivable that if computers get
complex enough, they also begin to know consciously like we do. In the
AI community many people believe so, but I have no idea whether that is
true or not. I don’t experience my computer as more conscious than my
pencil, but I may quite well be wrong. As far as I can see, the camera
which is recording the whole proceedings is not more aware of what it
is recording than the ceiling. The camera is just a bunch of
electronics registering sound and light inputs. But we are conscious,
and the more I think about it, the more amazing it appears to me.

We do have this secret ingredient that makes us aware of what we see,
and touch and hear, and do, and we are aware of all those things in a
highly peculiar manner, we experience it as a 3D world, largely visual
but spruced up with the other senses, and in a rather strange and vague
way mixed with verbal meanings, a world of which we accept part as our
“self” and part as “not-self”, a world forever in flux. Somehow we can
get out of that presentation, experience an absolute purity, emptiness,
and then have an acute, exhilarating awareness of truth, of reality.
And this capacity to get out of the map, this ability to enter the
void, become consciousness pure, is the central point of yoga and
perhaps the turning point that can make human life really worth the
trouble.


Planes of pre-existing knowledge

For knowledge the important point is that once our consciousness is
free and in itself, we can try explore these inner realms of conscious
being and to tap directly into those typal planes that precede the
whole physical manifestation. Sri Aurobindo has several chapters in The
Life Divine devoted to these issues, but the most directly relevant is
the chapter on “Separative knowledge and knowledge by identity”. He
says here that it’s absolutely crucial at some stage to become aware of
the inner worlds in ourselves. Because that has to be the beginning of
an entry into the subtle worlds from where the outer manifest and
material worlds are actually being determined. Once we are in those
inner worlds then there’s no limit to our possibilities for evolution
into a higher harmony, beauty and truth. Sri Aurobindo here also says
that even our knowledge of the outer world which seems to be
constructed by the sense mind on the basis of the workings of the
senses and the nervous system is actually possible only because we know
subconsciously already what the world looks like. The sense-based input
is only an excuse that triggers a pre-existent knowledge which is
already there.

Sri Aurobindo says that all that’s there in The Life Divine, all the
knowledge that’s there in The Synthesis of Yoga, the Foundations of
Indian Culture, The Human Cycle and so on, all those things he wrote in
the Arya, just came to him pouring down. Historically, physically it
must indeed have been like that, because he wrote the Arya in a rather
special manner. The Arya came out every month for about 6 years. Sri
Aurobindo serialized in each 64 page issue of the Arya, typically one
chapter of The Life Divine, one of The Synthesis of Yoga, one of Secret
of the Vedas, one of The Ideal of Human Unity and one or two of other
books, in total some 5-6 chapters every month. And he did not work on
that the whole month. He asked on of his disciples to warn him a week
before the text had to go the press, and then he must have written
something like one full chapter a day. Many of you must have been
writing at some stage, but to write one chapter of The Life Divine in a
day is almost physically impossible, it’s really amazing. And he did
not make mistakes; we have many of his manuscripts, and they clearly
just came, to perfection. Later he did make changes, but again in those
changes there were hardly ever mistakes; there were, once in a while,
but extremely rare, and always minor things like commas.

Sri Aurobindo describes the higher mind as a state in which knowledge
comes entirely ready-made from above. And it has the unitary vision of
the global whole. The higher mind is not partial or one-sided, the
higher mind understands the harmony of the whole. And if you go there,
it is quite fancy, because the answers come first and the questions
afterward, and the answers come with all their connections. Like a huge
interconnected web that straight away gets the whole point. How to put
that kind of knowledge into words may also be given, or it may remain a
problem, but that broad understanding is there straight away. All that
was written in the Arya, Sri Aurobindo ascribes to the higher mind,
which in Sri Aurobindo’s later hierarchy is only the lowest plane above
the ordinary mind. There are many people who seem to have reached
similar levels, because we can see from their writing that they have
that global vision, but Sri Aurobindo discovered later a whole
hierarchy of worlds of a higher consciousness above it.

Top-down and bottom-up
What should we understand by knowledge pouring down? Cognitive science
says that we generate knowledge by the chemistry in our brain, on the
basis of the input from our physical senses, probably in the form of
patterns of synapses or whatever the physical substrate is. The social
scientists add another layer of complexity saying that everything we
know is a social construct. But Sri Aurobindo says that the knowledge
in these books descended like that, as a continuous stream of intuitive
thoughts. In standard science, when intuition is discussed, it is seen
as a very fast subconscious processing of known facts, but that is
something entirely different. Sri Aurobindo calls that
pseudo-intuition, because the real intuition, doesn’t come
horizontally, it also doesn’t come from below; it comes ready-made from
above. Once more, what does that mean? Is that a real possibility? And
if it is, how does that relate to the constructed knowledge in the
physical brain?

There is a more or less similar phenomenon within the physical plane
itself. Here the outer physical reality seems to be only the final
expression, the final condensation of what manifest first in the subtle
physical. It seems to be like that because when you contact the subtle
physical you can sometimes see there things that are bound to happen in
the future, because in that subtle plane they have already happened.
Similarly there are subtle mental planes where the ideas are already
ready before they crystallizes in our language. Sri Aurobindo says that
all knowledge is basically already there, it pre-exists our human
awareness of it. And if you silence your mind you can sometimes see how
ideas enter your mind from other realms.

I had one student who described it very nicely. We were doing a little
silencing exercise in the class, and most students then described how
the mind goes on buzzing, darting off, then on this sidetrack and then
on that, but this kid said, “it’s not difficult, you just stop these
thoughts from coming in” and she meant it. I don’t know if she had read
Sri Aurobindo about this, she may have or may not have, but you could
clearly see that she was simply describing what she was actually doing.
She apparently identified with the pure Purusha, and in that inner
silence, she was seeing how thoughts come in, and she could stop them
right there at the point of entry. It’s rare that someone of that age,
20 or so, can do that and can see it so clearly, but that’s what she
did. The idea comes in, very thin and ethereal, and once it is in the
mind, it clothes itself, it dresses itself up with words, and then it’s
too late, then you cannot get it out anymore. Most of us miss that
first part, so we know what we think only after we have thought it,
after the idea has solidified itself into words. We don’t catch the
idea at the moment that it comes in.

Many people who have studied the history of science say that science
moves in leaps and bounds. Someone has one bright idea which gets
formulated more or less perfectly right at the beginning, and then
there are hundreds of other scientists who just corroborate that idea.
So it moves in spurts. The people who initiate those jumps are the ones
that really bring science further, and some of them have described how
they got to their ideas in a sudden intuition.

A mathematician friend of mine, who is not doing any form of yoga, told
me once that he was very concerned that in the teaching of mathematics
people stress so much the proving stage where you try to show that the
thing is really true. This is a laborious and technical process, and
though it takes time, it is generally not that difficult. But, he said,
what we don’t teach at all is how to get at the initial intuition.
Another mathematician I know expressed the same idea, when he told me
that in mathematics people first “see” the solution and then with their
knowledge and their experience they fill in the details on how to get
there, but they don’t get at the solution by the same road by which
they prove it afterwards. The initial insight comes ready-made from
above, and then the proof is built up from the bottom. Perhaps it is
somewhat like with a building: the owner starts with a vague idea, then
the architect makes exact building plans and the engineers work them
out in all technical detail, and then finally the craftsmen build it
from the bottom up, brick by brick. But the original plan did not come
from the bottom up, it came just like that from above, and was refined,
detailed out in a series of mixed up-down and down-up interactions. I
think we’ll get in the afternoon to education and obviously, if one
really grasps this, education should be entirely different. We should
allow children to stay in contact with the inner, higher knowledge much
longer, so that they can get used to it, trust it, and learn from
there.

There are many interesting aspects to this dual process. We tend for
example to think of science, especially physics as dealing with the
physical reality, but this is only half of the truth. Physics is half
mathematics. Math is not a physical reality at all, it’s a purely
mental stuff. Physics moves ahead sometimes by mathematics going ahead
first and sometimes by experiments getting there first, but in the end
both are needed to make a solid step forwards. What we see at the
moment is a fast increasing knowledge of the physical domain and at the
same time we are become more and more sophisticated mentally. We become
better and better at playing in those mental worlds that somehow render
in the mental domain, in the mental substance, some aspects of the
physical world.

The Psychic Being
To close, I still want to say something at least about the psychic
being because that’s really the most important part of us. As we all
know, in Sri Aurobindo’s yoga the psychic being came to occupy a larger
and larger place as time went on. And it’s quite interesting why this
is so, and why this is different from the previous systems of yoga and
meditation. If you just want to reach the absolute, you definitely
don’t need the psychic being. You can go there, it is one path, but
there are 1000s of other paths. You can follow any path, and as long as
you follow it to its absolute end, it reaches the absolute, and whether
you reach the absolute this way or that way, really doesn’t matter that
much because what you want is to get rid of the relativities in which
the ego gets entangled.

But the psychic being, as the centre of our own nature, is absolutely
crucial for the transformation and indispensable for a new creation
that’s fully conscious. The main reason for this is simply that the
psychic being is the divine kernel in us. So it is the most important
part of us, it is what we actually are in the very core of our
incarnate being. But to get there we have explore all those in between
layers that determine our outer nature. And it’s only when we have that
full knowledge that we can begin to think of transformation. We have to
know why we say what we say, why we do what we do, everything that’s
going on inside. We have to become entirely transparent, there can be
no dark spots left, because as long as they are there, the supramental
cannot get in. It’s simple, straightforward. We have to go to that
secret that’s behind all this, to our absolute kernel, and from there
we can begin to work on the rest of our nature. This psychic reversal
is essential, but it is not sufficient because we have also to reach
those higher layers of consciousness above the ordinary mind. In other
words, we have to get the full spiritual transformation as well,
because only then will we have the full knowledge which Sri Aurobindo
obviously had, and even that full knowledge again is not sufficient. Is
like what Ron said in the morning: Integrality is not a joke, it is not
just amalgamating things

There’s a chapter in The Life Divine where Sri Aurobindo goes on
saying, that higher and higher layers of consciousness are still not
integral enough. He first describes the higher mind and when you read
the description you think, wow, that’s it. And then he says that’s not
enough, and then he describes the illumined mind where you have direct
visions of the truth beyond verbal thought. He describes it as a sea of
lightning. It’s very far beyond a simply inspired mind, and then again
he explains why that’s not integral enough. Then he goes to the
intuitive layer, the source of the two previous layers, where there’s
absolute truth beyond words and forms. It is beyond the vision mind, it
is beyond the unitary mind, it is beyond thought, it’s absolute truth,
as high as you can reach on an individual level. Then again that’s not
yet it, and then he describes the Overmind, which is entirely beyond
the ego, which is cosmic, which is vast, which has a full opening to
the transcendent. But even that is not integral enough. And then when
you are completely blasted and spaced out, he says something about the
Supermind which I won’t even quote because I don’t understand it. Only
then he says that that’s the real truth that creates the worlds. Now
that supramental reality is entirely beyond our sense mind. So you
should never think that we can have a supramental consciousness as long
as we look at the world from outside. The supermind does not need the
sense-mind. We are caught in that sense mind, which is in principle the
same mind that dogs have; we have our intellectual super-layer, but, in
a way, that’s just making life complicated. Our higher faculties help
us to jump out of our routine once in a while, write a piece of nice
poetry, do something special, but as far as most of our life goes, it
is not that different from the way dogs live. We haven’t got much
further, we do things in a more complicated and sophisticated manner,
but the basic principle is still the same. For the supramental this
will not do. We have to go entirely beyond the sense-mind. Even
physically, literally, the sense-mind is based on reflections, it is
based on seeing surfaces, and the supramental consciousness is not
reflective, it is a knowledge that comes directly from within. Sri
Aurobindo describes it as a consciousness where every little particle
of our being, every little cell of the body is itself conscious of its
divine origin; it knows its connection with the world, and from that
inner strength and Light, does its true job in the world.

Mother describes that at the end of her life she could see better with
her eyes closed than with her eyes open. There are many people who have
had that experience, she is not the only one. Our knowledge about
reality does not need to come through our senses. We can live from
within and we can have that Truth in every little part of our being.
The transformation Sri Aurobindo envisages is very much more radical
than people think. This doesn’t mean that people cannot work even now
on their bodily consciousness, that they cannot work on the
consciousness of the cells. The Divine, I think is, is in a hurry, she
is very busy, and she works on all those planes simultaneously. Even
our increasing knowledge about the physical and mathematical reality,
is part of the process. She is working that out so that we can do there
things, it’s a cliché, but we can do there things that have never been
done before. When you travel, for example, it’s fantastic, you get into
an airplane which is just like a cinema hall and you don’t travel, at
least you have no sense of movement except a little bit at takeoff and
landing, otherwise you just get in and you get out somewhere else. And
this is very significant, it is getting very close to gross-physical
bi-location, being in one place and being in another place at the same
time, and this is now common place. Anybody who watches TV is instantly
somewhere else. The farmer in India spends half his time in Bombay and
a quarter in NY and then only the little rest in his own village. We
all live in a loose virtual space, we have left our bondedness to
earth. We begin to do things with matter that are quite far out. Where
are you when you talk through a telephone, are you here, are you there,
are you no-where? Our whole sense of space has collapsed. Even time is
becoming strange. Any time you have a moment of infinity in your day,
one second of eternity in your experience, your whole perspective on
the day changes. If for a minute you enjoy your eternal soul, then it
looks that anything before that was ages ago, so a day can look
infinitely long, while years can just pass by like that. Both time and
space have disappeared. Something essential is changing even in our
stupid physical sense mind.

The Divine is working on all those things at the same time but the
saving grace is in the finding of the eternal being in yourself. There
is no way we could get an immortal body before we know we are immortal
in any case. There are these beautiful stories in the Upanishads where
Indra comes to Prajapati to learn the knowledge that makes immortal.
They are strange stories because Indra is already immortal as it is.
But in the story he wants to get “the knowledge that makes immortal” so
that he can fight the Asuras better. It must mean that he wants to find
his eternal being, so that from that sense of eternity he can fight the
dark forces in his mind. He stands for the lord of the mind and the
mind can fight the darkness in itself only when it knows its eternal
origin. And in us that is the knowledge of the psychic.

Summary
The “ordinary” world of which our sense-mind makes such entrancing
representations, is a mixed world in which ever more sophisticated
types of consciousness are embodied in ever more complex physical
substrates. Besides this evolving mixed world, there are also typal
worlds, where different types of consciousness form static worlds of
their own. Everything in existence, whatever its size, and whatever the
plane of consciousness on which it exists, carries deep within it all
the knowledge, power and joy of the Divine.

The symbolic, representational knowledge that plays such an enormous
role in our knowledge-society is actually the symbolic rendering of one
particular form of knowledge, somewhere half-way between the totally
embedded knowledge that we find in matter’s “habit of form”, and the
truth-ideas of the supramental plane which are the ultimate blueprints
for all that exists. Our ordinary waking consciousness identifies
itself with the workings of the sense-mind, which is in its turn
largely determined by the workings of the nervous system which through
the immense complexity of its interconnectedness can embody complex
maps of reality. Still, even the knowledge of this sense-mind is
secretly informed by our pre-existing knowledge from within. All our
knowledge, whether outwardly triggered by our senses and laboriously
built-up by our sense-mind, or inwardly triggered by ready-made
intuitions from the higher planes of pre-existing knowledge, is in the
end not more than an evocation, an awakening of the knowledge we have
already within us. To the extent that we can silence the brain-based
sense mind, we can become more aware of the inner knowledge in its
purity and intrinsic power. The silent brain-based mind can then be
used as a passive instrument to express that inner knowledge in the
outer physical world.

If we approach the higher knowledge through a movement in our subtle
body upwards towards the sahasrara, we open ourselves to the impersonal
knowledge planes above the ordinary mind. Though liberating and
exhilarating, the higher knowledge obtained here is of a general,
impersonal nature, and does not help us directly with the conduct of
our individual lives. For this we need to go inwards to psychic being
deep behind the heart, where our individual divine kernel is situated.
It is this centre that can guide our individual transformation from a
being living in ignorance to a fully divinised centre of consciousness
in matter. To accomplish this we need first a full psychic conversion,
not only of our essential being, but also of our instrumental nature,
and then to bring the higher types of consciousness down into every
corner of our being, right into the lowest recesses of the inconscient.

There is still much to do. Happy Journey!

Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Five, "The Triple Transformation"

Integral Yoga Literature – By Sri Aurobindo

Selections from the Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library

from Volume 18 and 19, The Life Divine


COPYRIGHT NOTICE:

The contents of this document are copyright 1972, Sri Aurobindo Ashram
Trust, Pondicherry, India. You may make a digital copy or printout of
this text for your personal, non-commercial use under the condition
that you copy this document without modifications and in its entirety,
including this copyright notice.



Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Five, “The Triple Transformation” (Part 1 of 3)



A conscious being is the centre of the self, who rules past and future; he
is like a fire without smoke…. That, one must disengage with patience
from one’s own body.

Katha Upanishad II.1.12,13; II.3.17.


An intuition in the heart sees that truth.

Rig Veda I.24.12.


I abide in the spiritual being and from there destroy the darkness born of
ignorance with the shining lamp of knowledge.

Gita X.11.


These rays are directed downwards, their foundation is above: may they be
set deep within us…. O Varuna, here awake, make wide thy reign; may we
abide in the law of thy workings and be blameless before the Mother
Infinite.

Rig Veda I.24.7,11,15.


The Swan that settles in the purity… born of the Truth, — itself the
Truth, the Vast.

Katha Upanishad II.2. 2.

IF IT is the sole intention of Nature in the evolution of the spiritual man
to awaken him to the supreme Reality and release him from herself, or from
the Ignorance in which she as the Power of the Eternal has masked herself, by
a departure into a higher status of being elsewhere, if this step in the
evolution is a close and an exit, then in the essence her work has been
already accomplished and there is nothing more to be done. The ways have been
built, the capacity to follow them has been developed, the goal or last
height of the creation is manifest; all that is left is for each soul to
reach individually the right stage and turn of its development, enter into
the spiritual ways and pass by its own chosen path out of this inferior
existence. But we have supposed that there is a farther intention, — not
only a revela-tion of the Spirit, but a radical and integral transformation
of Nature. There is a will in her to effectuate a true manifestation of the
embodied life of the Spirit, to complete what she has begun by a passage from
the Ignorance to the Knowledge, to throw off her mask and to reveal herself
as the luminous Consciousness-Force carrying in her the eternal Existence and
its universal Delight of being. It then becomes obvious that there is
something not yet accomplished, there becomes clear to view the much that
has still to be done, bhuri aspasta kartvam; there is a height still to be
reached, a wideness still to be covered by the eye of vision, the wing of
the will, the self-affirmation of the Spirit in the material universe. What
the evolutionary Power has done is to make a few individuals aware of their
souls, conscious of their selves, aware of the eternal being that they are,
to put them into communion with the Divinity or the Reality which is
concealed by her appearances: a certain change of nature prepares,
accompanies or follows upon this illumination, but it is not the complete
and radical change which establishes a secure and settled new principle, a
new creation, a permanent new order of being in the field of terrestrial
Nature. The spiritual man has evolved, but not the supramental being who
shall thenceforward be the leader of that Nature.

This is because the principle of spirituality has yet to affirm itself
in its own complete right and sovereignty; it has been up till now a power
for the mental being to escape from itself or to refine and raise itself to
a spiritual poise, it has availed for the release of the Spirit from mind
and for the enlargement of the being in a spiritualised mind and heart, but
not, — or rather not yet sufficiently, — for the self-affirmation of the
Spirit in its own dynamic and sovereign mastery free from the mind’s
limitations and from the mental instrumentation. The development of another
instrumentation has begun, but has yet to become total and effective; it has
besides to cease to be a purely individual self-creation in an original
Ignorance, something supernormal to earth-life that must always be acquired
as an individual achievement by a difficult endeavour. It must become the
normal nature of a new type of being; as Mind is established here on a basis
of Ignorance seeking for Knowledge and growing into Knowledge, so Supermind
must be established here on a basis of Knowledge growing into its own
greater Light. But this cannot be so long as the spiritual-mental being has
not risen fully to Supermind and brought down its powers into terrestrial
existence. For the gulf between Mind and Supermind has to be bridged, the
closed passages opened and roads of ascent and descent created where there
is now a void and a silence. This can be done only by the triple
transformation to which we have already made a passing reference: there must
first be the psychic change, the conversion of our whole present nature into
a soul-instrumentation; on that or along with that there must be the
spiritual change, the descent of a higher Light, Knowledge, Power, Force,
Bliss, Purity into the whole being, even into the lowest recesses of the
life and body, even into the darkness of our subconscience; last, there must
supervene the supramental transmutation, — there must take place as the
crowning movement the ascent into the Supermind and the transforming descent
of the supramental Consciousness into our entire being and nature.

At the beginning the soul in Nature, the psychic entity, whose
unfolding is the first step towards a spiritual change, is an entirely
veiled part of us, although it is that by which we exist and persist as
individual beings in Nature. The other parts of our natural composition are
not only mutable but perishable; but the psychic entity in us persists and
is fundamentally the same always: it contains all essential possibilities of
our manifestation but is not constituted by them; it is not limited by what
it manifests, not contained by the incomplete forms of the manifestation,
not tarnished by the imperfections and impurities, the defects and
depravations of the surface being. It is an ever-pure flame of the divinity
in things and nothing that comes to it, nothing that enters into our
experience can pollute its purity or extinguish the flame. This spiritual
stuff is immaculate and luminous and, because it is perfectly luminous, it
is immediately, intimately, directly aware of truth of being and truth of
nature; it is deeply conscious of truth and good and beauty because truth
and good and beauty are akin to its own native character, forms of
something that is inherent in its own substance. It is aware also of all
that contradicts these things, of all that deviates from its own native
character, of falsehood and evil and the ugly and the unseemly; but it does
not become these things nor is it touched or changed by these opposites of
itself which so powerfully affect its outer instrumentation of mind, life and
body. For the soul, the permanent being in us, puts forth and uses mind,
life and body as its instruments, undergoes the envelopment of their
conditions, but it is other and greater than its members.

If the psychic entity had been from the beginning unveiled and known
to its ministers, not a secluded King in a screened chamber, the human
evolution would have been a rapid soul-outflowering, not the difficult,
chequered and disfigured development it now is; but the veil is thick and we
know not the secret Light within us, the light in the hidden crypt of the
heart’s innermost sanctuary. Intimations rise to our surface from the
psyche, but our mind does not detect their source; it takes them for its
own activities because, before even they come to the surface, they are
clothed in mental substance: thus ignorant of their authority, it follows or
does not follow them according to its bent or turn at the moment. If the
mind obeys the urge of the vital ego, then there is little chance of the
psyche at all controlling the nature or manifesting in us something of its
secret spiritual stuff and native movement; or, if the mind is
over-confident to act in its own smaller light, attached to its own
judgment, will and action of knowledge, then also the soul will remain
veiled and quiescent and wait for the mind’s farther evolution. For the
psychic part within is there to support the natural evolution, and the
first natural evolution must be the development of body, life and mind,
successively, and these must act each in its own kind or together in their
ill-assorted partnership in order to grow and have experience and evolve.
The soul gathers the essence of all our mental, vital and bodily experience
and assimilates it for the farther evolution of our existence in Nature; but
this action is occult and not obtruded on the surface. In the early material
and vital stages of the evolution of being there is indeed no consciousness
of soul; there are psychic activities, but the instrumentation, the form of
these activities are vital and physical, — or mental when the mind is
active. For even the mind, so long as it is primitive or is developed but
still too external, does not recognise their deeper character. It is easy to
regard ourselves as physical beings or beings of life or mental beings using
life and body and to ignore the existence of the soul altogether: for the
only definite idea that we have of the soul is of something that survives
the death of our bodies; but what this is we do not know because even if we
are conscious sometimes of its presence, we are not normally conscious of
its distinct reality nor do we feel clearly its direct action in our nature.

As the evolution proceeds, Nature begins slowly and tentatively to
manifest our occult parts; she leads us to look more and more within
ourselves or sets out to initiate more clearly recognisable intimations and
formations of them on the surface. The soul in us, the psychic principle,
has already begun to take secret form; it puts forward and develops a
soul-personality, a distinct psychic being to represent it. This psychic
being remains still behind the veil in our subliminal part, like the true
mental, the true vital or the true or subtle physical being within us: but,
like them, it acts on the surface life by the influences and intimations it
throws up upon that surface; these form part of the surface aggregate which
is the conglomerate effect of the inner influences and upsurgings, the
visible formation and superstructure which we ordinarily experience and
think of as ourselves. On this ignorant surface we become dimly aware of
something that can be called a soul as distinct from mind, life or body; we
feel it not only as our mental idea or vague instinct of ourselves, but as a
sensible influence in our life and character and action. A certain
sensitive feeling for all that is true and good and beautiful, fine and
pure and noble, a response to it, a demand for it, a pressure on mind and
life to accept and formulate it in our thought, feelings, conduct, character
is the most usually recognised, the most general and characteristic, though
not the sole sign of this influence of the psyche. Of the man who has not
this element in him or does not respond at all to this urge, we say that he
has no soul. For it is this influence that we can most easily recognise as
a finer or even a diviner part in us and the most powerful for the slow
turning towards some aim at perfection in our nature.

But this psychic influence or action does not come up to the surface
quite pure or does not remain distinct in its purity; if it did, we would be
able to distinguish clearly the soul element in us and follow consciously
and fully its dictates. An occult mental and vital and subtle-physical
action intervenes, mixes with it, tries to use it and turn it to its own
profit, dwarfs its divinity, distorts or diminishes its self-expression,
even causes it to deviate and stumble or stains it with the impurity,
smallness and error of mind and life and body. After it reaches the surface,
thus alloyed and diminished, it is taken hold of by the surface nature in
an obscure reception and ignorant formation, and there is or can be by this
cause a still further deviation and mixture. A twist is given, a wrong
direction is imparted, a wrong application, a wrong formation, an erroneous
result of what is in itself pure stuff and action of our spiritual being; a
formation of consciousness is accordingly made which is a mixture of the
psychic influence and its intimations jumbled with mental ideas and
opinions, vital desires and urges, habitual physical tendencies. There
coalesce too with the obscured soul-influence the ignorant though
well-intentioned efforts of these external parts towards a higher direction;
a mental ideation of a very mixed character, often obscure even in its
idealism, sometimes even disastrously mistaken, a fervour and passion of the
emotional being throwing up its spray and foam of feelings, sentiments,
sentimentalisms, a dynamic enthusiasm of the life-parts, eager responses of
the physical, the thrills and excitements of nerve and body, — all these
influences coalesce in a composite formation which is frequently taken as
the soul and its mixed and confused action for the soul-stir, for a psychic
development and action or a realised inner influence. The psychic entity is
itself free from stain or mixture, but what comes up from it is not
protected by that immunity; therefore this confusion becomes possible.

Moreover, the psychic being, the soul-personality in us, does not
emerge full-grown and luminous; it evolves, passes through a slow
development and formation; its figure of being may be at first indistinct
and may afterwards remain for a long time weak and undeveloped, not impure
but imperfect: for it rests its formation, its dynamic self-building on the
power of soul that has been actually and more or less successfully, against
the resistance of the Ignorance and Inconscience, put forth in the
evolution upon the surface. Its appearance is the sign of a soul-emergence
in Nature, and if that emergence is as yet small and defective, the psychic
personality also will be stunted or feeble. It is too, by the obscurity of
our consciousness, separated from its inner reality, in imperfect
communication with its own source in the depths of the being; for the road
is as yet ill-built, easily obstructed, the wires often cut or crowded with
communications of another kind and proceeding from another origin: its power
to impress what it receives upon the outer instruments is also imperfect; in
its penury it has for most things to rely on these instruments and it forms
its push to expression and action on their data and not solely on the
unerring perceptions of the psychic entity. In these conditions it cannot
prevent the true psychic light from being diminished or distorted in the
mind into a mere idea or opinion, the psychic feeling in the heart into a
fallible emotion or mere sentiment, the psychic will to action in the
life-parts into a blind vital enthusiasm or a fervid excitement: it even
accepts these mistranslations for want of something better and tries to
fulfil itself through them. For it is part of the work of the soul to
influence mind and heart and vital being and turn their ideas, feelings,
enthusiasms, dynamisms in the direction of what is divine and luminous; but
this has to be done at first imperfectly, slowly and with a mixture. As the
psychic personality grows stronger, it begins to increase its communion with
the psychic entity behind it and improve its communications with the
surface: it can transmit its intimations to the mind and heart and life with
a greater purity and force; for it is more able to exercise a strong control
and react against false mixtures; now more and more it makes itself
distinctly felt as a power in the nature. But even so this evolution would
be slow and long if left solely to the difficult automatic action of the
evolutionary Energy; it is only when man awakes to the knowledge of the soul
and feels a need to bring it to the front and make it the master of his life
and action that a quicker conscious method of evolution intervenes and a
psychic transformation becomes possible.

This slow development can be aided by the mind’s clear perception and
insistence on something within that survives the death of the body and an
effort to know its nature. But at first this knowledge is impeded by the
fact that there are many elements in us, many formations which present
themselves as soul-elements and can be mistaken for the psyche. In the early
Greek and some other traditions about the after-life, the descriptions
given show very clearly that what was then mistaken for the soul was a
subconscious formation, a subphysical impression-mould or shadow-form of the
being or else a wraith or ghost of the personality. This ghost, which is
mistakenly called the spirit, is sometimes a vital formation reproducing the
man’s characteristics, his surface life-mannerisms, sometimes a
subtle-physical prolongation of the surface form of the mind-shell: at best
it is a sheath of the life-personality which still remains in the front for
some time after the departure from the body. Apart from these confusions
born of an after-death contact with discarded phantasms or remnants of the
sheaths of the personality, the difficulty is due to our ignorance of the
subliminal parts of our nature and the form and powers of the conscious
being or Purusha which preside over their action; owing to this inexperience
we can easily mistake something of the inner mind or vital self for the
psychic. For as Being is one yet multiple, so also the same law prevails in
ourselves and our members; the Spirit, the Purusha is one but it adapts
itself to the formations of Nature. Over each grade of our being a power of
the Spirit presides; we have within us and discover when we go deep enough
inwards a mind-self, a life-self, a physical self; there is a being of mind,
a mental Purusha, expressing something of itself on our surface in the
thoughts, perceptions, activities of our mind-nature, a being of life which
expresses something of itself in the impulses, feelings, sensations,
desires, external life-activities of our vital nature, a physical being, a
being of the body which expresses something of itself in the instincts,
habits, formulated activities of our physical nature. These beings or part
selves of the self in us are powers of the Spirit and therefore not limited
by their temporary expression, for what is thus formulated is only a fragment
of its possibilities; but the expression creates a temporary mental, vital
or physical personality which grows and develops even as the psychic being
or soul-personality grows and develops within us. Each has its own distinct
nature, its influence, its action on the whole of us; but on our surface all
these influences and all this action, as they come up, mingle and create an
aggregate surface being which is a composite, an amalgam of them all, an
outer persistent and yet shifting and mobile formation for the purposes of
this life and its limited experience.

But this aggregate is, because of its composition, a heterogeneous
compound, not a single harmonious and homogeneous whole. This is the reason
why there is a constant confusion and even a conflict in our members which
our mental reason and will are moved to control and harmonise and have often
much difficulty in creating out of their confusion or conflict some kind of
order and guidance; even so, ordinarily, we drift too much or are driven by
the stream of our nature and act from whatever in it comes uppermost at the
time and seizes the instruments of thought and action, — even our seemingly
deliberate choice is more of an automatism than we imagine; our
co-ordination of our multifarious elements and of our consequent thoughts,
feelings, impulses, actions by the reason and will is incomplete and a
half-measure. In animal being Nature acts by her own mental and vital
intuitions; she works out an order by the compulsion of habit and instinct
which the animal implicitly obeys, so that the shiftings of its
consciousness do not matter. But man cannot altogether act in the same way
without forfeiting his prerogative of manhood; he cannot leave his being to
be a chaos of instincts and impulses regulated by the automatism of Nature:
mind has become conscious in him and is therefore self-compelled to make
some attempt, however elementary in many, to see and control and in the end
more and more perfectly harmonise the manifold components, the different and
conflicting tendencies that seem to make up his surface being. He does
succeed in setting up a sort of regulated chaos or ordered confusion in him,
or at least succeeds in thinking that he is directing himself by his mind
and will, even though in fact that direction is only partial; for not only a
disparate consortium of habitual motive-forces but also newly emergent vital
and physical tendencies and impulses, not always calculable or controllable,
and many incoherent and inharmonious mental elements use his reason and will,
enter into and determine his self-building, his nature-development, his life
action. Man is in his self a unique Person, but he is also in his
manifestation of self a multiperson; he will never succeed in being master of
himself until the Person imposes itself on his multipersonality and governs
it: but this can only be imperfectly done by the surface mental will and
reason; it can be perfectly done only if he goes within and finds whatever
central being is by its predominant influence at the head of all his
expression and action. In inmost truth it is his soul that is this central
being, but in outer fact it is often one or other of the part beings in him
that rules, and this representative of the soul, this deputy self he can
mistake for the inmost soul-principle.

Click to continue reading:
THE LIFE DIVINE, by Sri Aurobindo: Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Five, “The Triple Transformation” (Part 2 of 3)

Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Five, “The Triple Transformation” (Part 2 of 3)

This rule of different selves in us is at the root of the stages of
the development of human personality which we have already had occasion to
differentiate, and we can reconsider them now from the point of view of the
government of the nature by the inner principle. In some human beings it is
the physical Purusha, the being of body, who dominates the mind, will and
action; there is then created the physical man mainly occupied with his
corporeal life and habitual needs, impulses, life-habits, mind-habits,
body-habits, looking very little or not at all beyond that, subordinating
and restricting all his other tendencies and possibilities to that narrow
formation. But even in the physical man there are other elements and he
cannot live altogether as the human animal concerned with birth and death
and procreation and the satisfaction of common impulses and desires and the
maintenance of the life and the body: this is his normal type of
personality, but it is crossed, however feebly, with influences by which he
can proceed, if they are developed, to a higher human evolution. If the
inner subtle-physical Purusha insists, he can arrive at the idea of a finer,
more beautiful and perfect physical life and hope or attempt to realise it
in his own or in the collective or group existence. In others it is the
vital self, the being of life, who dominates and rules the mind, the will,
the action; then is created the vital man, concerned with self-affirmation,
self-aggrandisement, life-enlargement, satisfaction of ambition and passion
and impulse and desire, the claims of his ego, domination, power,
excitement, battle and struggle, inner and outer adventure: all else is
incidental or subordinated to this movement and building and expression of
the vital ego. But still in the vital man too there are or can be other
elements of a growing mental or spiritual character, even if these happen to
be less developed than his life-personality and life-power. The nature of
the vital man is more active, stronger and more mobile, more turbulent and
chaotic, often to the point of being quite unregulated, than that of the
physical man who holds on to the soil and has a certain material poise and
balance, but it is more kinetic and creative: for the element of the vital
being is not earth but air; it has more movement, less status. A vigorous
vital mind and will can grasp and govern the kinetic vital energies, but it
is more by a forceful compulsion and constraint than by a harmonisation of
the being. If, however, a strong vital personality, mind and will can get the
reasoning intelligence to give it a firm support and be its minister, then
a certain kind of forceful formation can be made, more or less balanced but
always powerful, successful and effective, which can impose itself on the
nature and environment and arrive at a strong self-affirmation in life and
action. This is the second step of harmonised formulation possible in the
ascent of the nature.

At a higher stage of the evolution of personality the being of mind
may rule; there is then created the mental man who lives predominantly in
the mind as the others live in the vital or the physical nature. The mental
man tends to subordinate to his mental self-expression, mental aims, mental
interests or to a mental idea or ideal the rest of his being: because of the
difficulty of this subordination and its potent effect when achieved, it is
at once more difficult for him and easier to arrive at a harmony of his
nature. It is easier because the mental will once in control can convince by
the power of the reasoning intelligence and at the same time dominate,
compress or suppress the life and the body and their demands, arrange and
harmonise them, force them to be its instruments, even reduce them to a
minimum so that they shall not disturb the mental life or pull it down from
its ideative or idealising movement. It is more difficult because life and
body are the first powers and, if they are in the least strong, can impose
themselves with an almost irresistible insistence on the mental ruler. Man
is a mental being and the mind is the leader of his life and body; but this
is a leader who is much led by his followers and has sometimes no other will
than what they impose on him. Mind in spite of its power is often impotent
before the inconscient and subconscient which obscure its clarity and carry
it away on the tide of instinct or impulse; in spite of its clarity it is
fooled by vital and emotional suggestions into giving sanction to ignorance
and error, to wrong thought and to wrong action, or it is obliged to look on
while the nature follows what it knows to be wrong, dangerous or evil. Even
when it is strong and clear and dominant, Mind, though it imposes a certain,
a considerable mentalised harmony, cannot integrate the whole being and
nature. These harmonisations by an inferior control are, besides,
inconclusive, because it is one part of the nature which dominates and
fulfils itself while the others are coerced and denied their fullness. They
can be steps on the way, but not final; therefore in most men there is no
such sole dominance and effected partial harmony, but only a predominance
and for the rest an unstable equilibrium of a personality half formed, half
in formation, sometimes a disequilibrium or unbalance due to the lack of a
central government or the disturbance of a formerly achieved partial poise.
All must be transitional until a first, though not a final, true
harmonisation is achieved by finding our real centre. For the true central
being is the soul, but this being stands back and in most human natures is
only the secret witness or, one might say, a constitutional ruler who allows
his ministers to rule for him, delegates to them his empire, silently
assents to their decisions and only now and then puts in a word which they
can at any moment override and act otherwise. But this is so long as the
soul-personality put forward by the psychic entity is not yet sufficiently
developed; when this is strong enough for the inner entity to impose itself
through it, then the soul can come forward and control the nature. It is by
the coming forward of this true monarch and his taking up of the reins of
government that there can take place a real harmonisation of our being and
our life.

A first condition of the soul’s complete emergence is a direct contact
in the surface being with the spiritual Reality. Because it comes from that,
the psychic element in us turns always towards whatever in phenomenal Nature
seems to belong to a higher Reality and can be accepted as its sign and
character. At first, it seeks this Reality through the good, the true, the
beautiful, through all that is pure and fine and high and noble: but
although this touch through outer signs and characters can modify and
prepare the nature, it cannot entirely or most inwardly and profoundly
change it. For such an inmost change the direct contact with the Reality
itself is indispensable since nothing else can so deeply touch the
foundations of our being and stir it or cast the nature by its stir into a
ferment of transmutation. Mental representations, emotional and dynamic
figures have their use and value; Truth, Good and Beauty are in themselves
primary and potent figures of the Reality, and even in their forms as seen
by the mind, as felt by the heart, as realised in the life can be lines of
an ascent: but it is in a spiritual substance and being of them and of itself
that That which they represent has to come into our experience.

The soul may attempt to achieve this contact mainly through the
thinking mind as intermediary and instrument; it puts a psychic impression
on the intellect and the larger mind of insight and intuitional intelligence
and turns them in that direction. At its highest the thinking mind is drawn
always towards the impersonal; in its search it becomes conscious of a
spiritual essence, an impersonal Reality which expresses itself in all these
outward signs and characters but is more than any formation or manifesting
figure. It feels something of which it becomes intimately and invisibly
aware, — a supreme Truth, a supreme Good, a supreme Beauty, a supreme
Purity, a supreme Bliss; it bears the increasing touch, less and less
impalpable and abstract, more and more spiritually real and concrete, the
touch and pressure of an Eternity and Infinity which is all this that is and
more. There is a pressure from this Impersonality that seeks to mould the
whole mind into a form of itself; at the same time the impersonal secret and
law of things becomes more and more visible. The mind develops into the
mind of the sage, at first the high mental thinker, then the spiritual sage
who has gone beyond the abstractions of thought to the beginnings of a
direct experience. As a result the mind becomes pure, large, tranquil,
impersonal; there is a similar tranquillising influence on the parts of
life: but otherwise the result may remain incomplete; for the mental change
leads more naturally towards an inner status and an outer quietude, but,
poised in this purifying quietism, not drawn like the vital parts towards a
discovery of new life-energies, does not press for a full dynamic effect on
the nature.

A higher endeavour through the mind does not change this balance; for
the tendency of the spiritualised mind is to go on upwards and, since above
itself the mind loses its hold on forms, it is into a vast formless and
featureless impersonality that it enters. It becomes aware of the unchanging
Self, the sheer Spirit, the pure bareness of an essential Existence, the
formless Infinite and the nameless Absolute. This culmination can be
arrived at more directly by tending immediately beyond all forms and
figures, beyond all ideas of good or evil or true or false or beautiful or
unbeautiful to That which exceeds all dualities, to the experience of a
supreme oneness, infinity, eternity or other ineffable sublimation of the
mind’s ultimate and extreme percept of Self or Spirit. A spiritualised
consciousness is achieved and the life falls quiet, the body ceases to need
and to clamour, the soul itself merges into the spiritual silence. But this
transformation through the mind does not give us the integral transformation;
the psychic transmutation is replaced by a spiritual change on the rare and
high summits, but this is not the complete divine dynamisation of Nature.

A second approach made by the soul to the direct contact is through
the heart: this is its own more close and rapid way because its occult seat
is there, just behind in the heart-centre, in close contact with the
emotional being in us; it is consequently through the emotions that it can
act best at the beginning with its native power, with its living force of
concrete experience. It is through a love and adoration of the All-Beautiful
and All-Blissful, the All-Good, the True, the spiritual Reality of love,
that the approach is made; the aesthetic and emotional parts join together
to offer the soul, the life, the whole nature to that which they worship.
This approach through adoration can get its full power and impetus only when
the mind goes beyond impersonality to the awareness of a supreme Personal
Being: then all becomes intense, vivid, concrete; the heart’s emotion,
feeling, spiritualised sense reach their absolute; an entire self-giving
becomes possible, imperative. The nascent spiritual man makes his appearance
in the emotional nature as the devotee, the bhakta; if, in addition, he
becomes directly aware of his soul and its dictates, unites his emotional
with his psychic personality and changes his life and vital parts by
purity, God-ecstasy, the love of God and men and all creatures into a thing
of spiritual beauty, full of divine light and good, he develops into the
saint and reaches the highest inner experience and most considerable change
of nature proper to this way of approach to the Divine Being. But for the
purpose of an integral transformation this too is not enough; there must be
a transmutation of the thinking mind and all the vital and physical parts of
consciousness in their own character.

This larger change can be partly attained by adding to the experiences
of the heart a consecration of the pragmatic will which must succeed in
carrying with it, — for otherwise it cannot be effective, — the adhesion
of the dynamic vital part which supports the mental dynamis and is our first
instrument of outer action. This consecration of the will in works proceeds
by a gradual elimination of the ego-will and its motive-power of desire;
the ego subjects itself to some higher law and finally effaces itself, seems
not to exist or exists only to serve a higher Power or a higher Truth or to
offer its will and acts to the Divine Being as an instrument. The law of
being and action or the light of Truth which then guides the seeker, may be
a clarity or power or principle which he perceives on the highest height of
which his mind is capable; or it may be a truth of the divine Will which he
feels present and working within him or guiding him by a Light or a Voice or
a Force or a divine Person or Presence. In the end by this way one arrives
at a consciousness in which one feels the Force or Presence acting within
and moving or governing all the actions and the personal will is entirely
surrendered or identified with that greater Truth-Will, Truth-Power or
Truth-Presence. A combination of all these three approaches, the approach of
the mind, the approach of the will, the approach of the heart, creates a
spiritual or psychic condition of the surface being and nature in which
there is a larger and more complex openness to the psychic light within us
and to the spiritual Self or the Ishwara, to the Reality now felt above and
enveloping and penetrating us. In the nature there is a more powerful and
many-sided change, a spiritual building and self-creation, the appearance of
a composite perfection of the saint, the selfless worker and the man of
spiritual knowledge.

But, for this change to arrive at its widest totality and profound
completeness, the consciousness has to shift its centre and its static and
dynamic position from the surface to the inner being; it is there that we
must find the foundation for our thought, life and action. For to stand
outside on our surface and to receive from the inner being and follow its
intimations is not a sufficient transformation; one must cease to be the
surface personality and become the inner Person, the Purusha. But this is
difficult, first because the outer nature opposes the movement and clings to
its normal accustomed poise and externalised way of existence and, in
addition, because there is a long way from the surface to the depths in
which the psychic entity is veiled from us, and this intervening space is
filled with a subliminal nature and nature-movements which are not by any
means all of them favourable to the completion of the inward movement. The
outer nature has to undergo a change of poise, a quieting, a purification
and fine mutation of its substance and energy by which the many obstacles in
it rarefy, drop away or otherwise disappear; it then becomes possible to
pass through to the depths of our being and from the depths so reached a new
consciousness can be formed, both behind the exterior self and in it,
joining the depths to the surface. There must grow up within us or there
must manifest a consciousness more and more open to the deeper and the
higher being, more and more laid bare to the cosmic Self and Power and to
what comes down from the Transcendence, turned to a higher Peace, permeable
to a greater light, force and ecstasy, a consciousness that exceeds the
small personality and surpasses the limited light and experience of the
surface mind, the limited force and aspiration of the normal
life-consciousness, the obscure and limited responsiveness of the body.

Even before the tranquillising purification of the outer nature has
been effected or before it is sufficient, one can still break down the wall
screening our inner being from our outer awareness by a strong force of call
and aspiration, a vehement will or violent effort or an effective discipline
or process; but this may be a premature movement and is not without its
serious dangers. In entering within one may find oneself amidst a chaos of
unfamiliar and supernormal experiences to which one has not the key or a
press of subliminal or cosmic forces, subconscient, mental, vital,
subtle-physical, which may unduly sway or chaotically drive the being,
encircle it in a cave of darkness, or keep it wandering in a wilderness of
glamour, allurement, deception, or push it into an obscure battlefield full
of secret and treacherous and misleading or open and violent oppositions;
beings and voices and influences may appear to the inner sense and vision
and hearing claiming to be the Divine Being or His messengers or Powers and
Godheads of the Light or guides of the path to realisation, while in truth
they are of a very different character. If there is too much egoism in the
nature of the seeker or a strong passion or an excessive ambition, vanity or
other dominating weakness, or an obscurity of the mind or a vacillating will
or a weakness of the life-force or an unsteadiness in it or want of
balance, he is likely to be seized on through these deficiencies and to be
frustrated or to deviate, misled from the true way of the inner life and
seeking into false paths, or to be left wandering about in an intermediate
chaos of experiences and fail to find his way out into the true realisation.
These perils were well-known to a past spiritual experience and have been
met by imposing the necessity of initiation, of discipline, of methods of
purification and testing by ordeal, of an entire submission to the
directions of the path-finder or path-leader, one who has realised the Truth
and himself possesses and is able to communicate the light, the experience,
a guide who is strong to take by the hand and carry over difficult passages
as well as to instruct and point out the way. But even so the dangers will
be there and can only be surmounted if there is or there grows up a complete
sincerity, a will for purity, a readiness for obedience to the Truth, for
surrender to the Highest, a readiness to lose or to subject to a divine yoke
the limiting and self-affirming ego. These things are the sign that the
true will for realisation, for conversion of the consciousness, for
transformation is there, the necessary stage of the evolution has been
reached: in that condition the defects of nature which belong to the human
being cannot be a permanent obstacle to the change from the mental to the
spiritual status; the process may never be entirely easy, but the way will
have been made open and practicable.

One effective way often used to facilitate this entry into the inner
self is the separation of the Purusha, the conscious being, from the
Prakriti, the formulated nature. If one stands back from the mind and its
activities so that they fall silent at will or go on as a surface movement
of which one is the detached and disinterested witness, it becomes possible
eventually to realise oneself as the inner Self of mind, the true and pure
mental being, the Purusha; by similarly standing back from the
life-activities, it is possible to realise oneself as the inner Self of
life, the true and pure vital being, the Purusha; there is even a Self of
body of which, by standing back from the body and its demands and
activities and entering into a silence of the physical consciousness
watching the action of its energy, it is possible to become aware, a true
and pure physical being, the Purusha. So too, by standing back from all
these activities of nature successively or together, it becomes possible to
realise one’s inner being as the silent impersonal self, the witness
Purusha. This will lead to a spiritual realisation and liberation, but will
not necessarily bring about a transformation; for the Purusha, satisfied to
be free and himself, may leave the nature, the Prakriti, to exhaust its
accumulated impetus by an unsupported action, a mechanical continuance not
renewed and reinforced or vivified and prolonged by his consent, and use
this rejection as a means of withdrawing from all nature. The Purusha has to
become not only the witness but the knower and source, the master of all the
thought and action, and this can only be partially done so long as one
remains on the mental level or has still to use the ordinary instrumentation
of mind, life and body. A certain mastery can indeed be achieved, but
mastery is not transformation; the change made by it cannot be sufficient to
be integral: for that it is essential to get back, beyond mind-being,
life-being, body-being, still more deeply inward to the psychic entity
inmost and profoundest within us, — or else to open to the superconscient
highest domains. For this penetration into the luminous crypt of the soul
one has to get through all the intervening vital stuff to the psychic centre
within us, however long, tedious or difficult may be the process. The method
of detachment from the insistence of all mental and vital and physical
claims and calls and impulsions, a concentration in the heart, austerity,
self-purification and rejection of the old mind-movements and life-movements,
rejection of the ego of desire, rejection of false needs and false habits,
are all useful aids to this difficult passage: but the strongest, most
central way is to found all such or other methods on a self-offering and
surrender of ourselves and of our parts of nature to the Divine Being, the
Ishwara. A strict obedience to the wise and intuitive leading of a Guide is
also normal and necessary for all but a few specially gifted seekers.

Click to continue reading:
THE LIFE DIVINE, by Sri Aurobindo: Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Five, “The Triple Transformation” (Part 3 of 3)


Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Five, “The Triple Transformation” (Part 3 of 3)

As the crust of the outer nature cracks, as the walls of inner
separation break down, the inner light gets through, the inner fire burns
in the heart, the substance of the nature and the stuff of consciousness
refine to a greater subtlety and purity, and the deeper psychic experiences,
those which are not solely of an inner mental or inner vital character,
become possible in this subtler, purer, finer substance; the soul begins to
unveil itself, the psychic personality reaches its full stature. The soul,
the psychic entity, then manifests itself as the central being which upholds
mind and life and body and supports all the other powers and functions of
the Spirit; it takes up its greater function as the guide and ruler of the
nature. A guidance, a governance begins from within which exposes every
movement to the light of Truth, repels what is false, obscure, opposed to
the divine realisation: every region of the being, every nook and corner of
it, every movement, formation, direction, inclination of thought, will,
emotion, sensation, action, reaction, motive, disposition, propensity,
desire, habit of the conscious or subconscious physical, even the most
concealed, camouflaged, mute, recondite, is lighted up with the unerring
psychic light, their confusions dissipated, their tangles disentangled,
their obscurities, deceptions, self-deceptions precisely indicated and
removed; all is purified, set right, the whole nature harmonised, modulated
in the psychic key, put in spiritual order. This process may be rapid or
tardy according to the amount of obscurity and resistance still left in the
nature, but it goes on unfalteringly so long as it is not complete. As a
final result the whole conscious being is made perfectly apt for spiritual
experience of every kind, turned towards spiritual truth of thought,
feeling, sense, action, tuned to the right responses, delivered from the
darkness and stubbornness of the tamasic inertia, the turbidities and
turbulences and impurities of the rajasic passion and restless unharmonised
kinetism, the enlightened rigidities and sattwic limitations or poised
balancements of constructed equilibrium which are the character of the
Ignorance.

This is the first result, but the second is a free inflow of all kinds
of spiritual experience, experience of the Self, experience of the Ishwara
and the Divine Shakti, experience of cosmic consciousness, a direct touch
with cosmic forces and with the occult movements of universal Nature, a
psychic sympathy and unity and inner communication and interchanges of all
kinds with other beings and with Nature, illuminations of the mind by
knowledge, illuminations of the heart by love and devotion and spiritual
joy and ecstasy, illuminations of the sense and the body by higher
experience, illuminations of dynamic action in the truth and largeness of a
purified mind and heart and soul, the certitudes of the divine light and
guidance, the joy and power of the divine force working in the will and the
conduct. These experiences are the result of an opening outward of the inner
and inmost being and nature; for then there comes into play the soul’s
power of unerring inherent consciousness, its vision, its touch on things
which is superior to any mental cognition; there is there, native to the
psychic consciousness in its pure working, an immediate sense of the world
and its beings, a direct inner contact with them and a direct contact with
the Self and with the Divine, — a direct knowledge, a direct sight of
Truth and of all truths, a direct penetrating spiritual emotion and feeling,
a direct intuition of right will and right action, a power to rule and to
create an order of the being not by the gropings of the superficial self,
but from within, from the inner truth of self and things and the occult
realities of Nature.

Some of these experiences can come by an opening of the inner mental
and vital being, the inner and larger and subtler mind and heart and life
within us, without any full emergence of the soul, the psychic entity, since
there too there is a power of direct contact of consciousness: but the
experience might then be of a mixed character; for there could be an
emergence not only of the subliminal knowledge but of the subliminal
ignorance. An insufficient expansion of the being, a limitation by mental
idea, by narrow and selective emotion or by the form of the temperament so
that there would be only an imperfect self-creation and action and not the
free soul-emergence, could easily occur. In the absence of any or of a
complete psychic emergence, experiences of certain kinds, experiences of
greater knowledge and force, a surpassing of the ordinary limits, might lead
to a magnified ego and even bring about instead of an out-flowering of what
is divine or spiritual an uprush of the titanic or demoniac, or might call
in agencies and powers which, though not of this disastrous type, are of a
powerful but inferior cosmic character. But the rule and guidance of the
soul brings into all experience the tendency of light, of integration, of
harmony and intimate rightness which is native to the psychic essence. A
psychic or, more widely speaking, a psycho-spiritual transformation of this
kind would be already a vast change of our mental human nature.

But all this change and all this experience, though psychic and
spiritual in essence and character, would still be, in its parts of
life-effectuation, on the mental, vital and physical level; its dynamic
spiritual outcome (1) The psychic and the spiritual opening with their
experiences and consequences can lead away from life or to a Nirvana; but
they are here being considered solely as steps in a transformation of the
nature.would be a flowering of the soul in mind and life and body, but in
act and form it would be circumscribed within the limitations, — however
enlarged, uplifted and rarefied, — of an inferior instrumentation. It would
be a reflected and modified manifestation of things whose full reality,
intensity, largeness, oneness and diversity of truth and power and delight
are above us, above mind and therefore above any perfection, within mind’s
own formula, of the foundations or superstructure of our present nature. A
highest spiritual transformation must intervene on the psychic or
psycho-spiritual change; the psychic movement inward to the inner being, the
Self or Divinity within us, must be completed by an opening upward to a
supreme spiritual status or a higher existence. This can be done by our
opening into what is above us, by an ascent of consciousness into the
ranges of overmind and supramental nature in which the sense of Self and
Spirit is ever unveiled and permanent and in which the self-luminous
instrumentation of the Self and Spirit is not restricted or divided as in our
mind-nature, life-nature, body-nature. This also the psychic change makes
possible; for as it opens us to the cosmic consciousness now hidden from us
by many walls of limiting individuality, so also it opens us to what is now
superconscient to our normality because it is hidden from us by the strong,
hard and bright lid of mind, — mind constricting, dividing and separative.
The lid thins, is slit, breaks asunder or opens and disappears under the
pressure of the psycho-spiritual change and the natural urge of the new
spiritualised consciousness towards that of which it is an expression here.
This effectuation of an aperture and its consequences may not at all take
place if there is only a partial psychic emergence satisfied with the
experience of the Divine Reality in the normal degrees of the spiritualised
mind: but if there is any awakening to the existence of these higher
supernormal levels, then an aspiration towards them may break the lid or
operate a rift in it. This may happen long before the psycho-spiritual
change is complete or even before it has well begun or proceeded far,
because the psychic personality has become aware and has an eager
concentration towards the superconscience. An early illumination from above
or a rending of the upper velamen can come as an outcome of aspiration or
some inner readiness, or it may even come uncalled for or not called for by
any conscious part of the mind, — perhaps by a secret subliminal necessity
or by an action or pressure from the higher levels, by something which is
felt as the touch of the Divine Being, the touch of the Spirit, — and its
results can be exceedingly powerful. But if it is brought about by a
premature pressure from below, it can be attended with difficulties and
dangers which are absent when the full psychic emergence precedes this first
admission to the superior ranges of our spiritual evolution. The choice,
however, does not always rest with our will, for the operations of the
spiritual evolution in us are very various, and according to the line it
has followed will be the turn taken at any critical phase by the action of
the Consciousness-Force in its urge towards a higher self-manifestation and
formation of our existence.

1. The psychic and the spiritual opening with their experiences and consequences can lead
away from life or to a Nirvana; but they are here being considered solely as steps in a
transformation of the nature.

If the rift in the lid of mind is made, what happens is an opening of
vision to something above us or a rising up towards it or a descent of its
powers into our being. What we see by the opening of vision is an Infinity
above us, an eternal Presence or an infinite Existence, an infinity of
consciousness, an infinity of bliss, — a boundless Self, a boundless Light,
a boundless Power, a boundless Ecstasy. It may be that for a long time all
that is obtained is the occasional or frequent or constant vision of it and
a longing and aspiration, but without anything further, because, although
something in the mind, heart or other part of the being has opened to this
experience, the lower nature as a whole is too heavy and obscure as yet for
more. But there may be, instead of this first wide awareness from below or
subsequently to it, an ascension of the mind to heights above: the nature
of these heights we may not know or clearly discern, but some consequence of
the ascent is felt; there is often too an awareness of infinite ascension
and return but no record or translation of that higher state. This is
because it has been superconscient to mind and therefore mind, when it rises
into it, is unable at first to retain there its power of conscious
discernment and defining experience. But when this power begins to awake and
act, when mind becomes by degrees conscious in what was to it
superconscient, then there begins a knowledge and experience of superior
planes of existence. The experience is in accord with that which is brought
to us by the first opening of vision: the mind rises into a higher plane of
pure Self, silent, tranquil, illimitable; or it rises into regions of Light
or of Felicity, or into planes where it feels an infinite Power or a divine
Presence or experiences the contact of a divine Love or Beauty or the
atmosphere of a wider and greater and luminous Knowledge. In the return the
spiritual impression abides; but the mental record is often blurred and
remains as a vague or a fragmentary memory; the lower consciousness from
which the ascent took place falls back to what it was, with only the
addition of an unkept or a remembered but no longer dynamic experience. In
time the ascent comes to be made at will and the consciousness brings back
and retains some effect or some gain of its temporary sojourn in these
higher countries of the Spirit. These ascents take place for many in trance,
but are perfectly possible in a concentration of the waking consciousness
or, where that consciousness has become sufficiently psychic, at any
unconcentrated moment by an upward attraction or affinity. But these two
types of contact with the superconscient, though they can be powerfully
illuminating, ecstatic or liberating, are by themselves insufficiently
effective: for the full spiritual transformation more is needed, a permanent
ascension from the lower into the higher consciousness and an effectual
permanent descent of the higher into the lower nature.

This is the third motion, the descent which is essential for bringing
the permanent ascension, an increasing inflow from above, an experience of
reception and retention of the descending Spirit or its powers and elements
of consciousness. This experience of descent can take place as a result of
the other two movements or automatically before either has happened,
through a sudden rift in the lid or a percolation, a downpour or an influx.
A light descends and touches or envelops or penetrates the lower being, the
mind, the life or the body; or a presence or a power or a stream of
knowledge pours in waves or currents, or there is a flood of bliss or a
sudden ecstasy; the contact with the superconscient has been established.
For such experiences repeat themselves till they become normal, familiar and
well-understood, revelatory of their contents and their significance which
may have at first been involved and wrapped into secrecy by the figure of
the covering experience. For a knowledge from above begins to descend,
frequently, constantly, then uninterruptedly, and to manifest in the mind’s
quietude or silence; intuitions and inspirations, revelations born of a
greater sight, a higher truth and wisdom, enter into the being, a luminous
intuitive discrimination works which dispels all darkness of understanding
or dazzling confusions, puts all in order; a new consciousness begins to
form, the mind of a high wide self-existent thinking knowledge or an
illumined or an intuitive or an overmental consciousness with new forces of
thought or sight and a greater power of direct spiritual realisation which
is more than thought or sight, a greater becoming in the spiritual
substance of our present being; the heart and the sense become subtle,
intense, large to embrace all existence, to see God, to feel and hear and
touch the Eternal, to make a deeper and closer unity of self and the world
in a transcendent realisation. Other decisive experiences, other changes of
consciousness determine themselves which are corollaries and consequences
of this fundamental change. No limit can be fixed to this revolution; for
it is in its nature an invasion by the Infinite.

This, effected little by little or in a succession of great and swift definitive experiences, is the
process of the spiritual transformation. It achieves itself and culminates in an upward ascent
often repeated by which in the end the consciousness fixes itself on a higher plane and from
there sees and governs the mind, life and body; it achieves itself also in an increasing descent of
the powers of the higher consciousness and knowledge which becomes more and more the
whole normal consciousness and knowledge. A light and power, a knowledge and force are felt
which first take possession of the mind and remould it, afterwards of the life=part and remould
that, finally of the little physical consciousness and leave it no longer little but wide and plastic
and even infinite. For this new consciousness has itself the nature of infinity: it brings to us the
abiding spiritual sense and awareness of the Infinite and Eternal with a great largeness of the
nature and a breaking down of its limitations; immortality becomes no longer a belief or an
experience but a normal self-awareness; the close presence of the Divine Being, his rule of the
world and of our self and natural members, his force working in us and everywhere, the peace
of the infinite, the joy of the Infinite are now concrete and constant in the being; in all sights and
forms one sees the Eternal, the Reality, in all sounds one hears it, in all touches feels it; there is
nothing else but its forms and personalities and manifestations; the joy or adoration of the heart,
the embrace of all existence, the unity of the spirit are abiding realities. The consciousness of
the mental creature is turning or has been already turned wholly into the consciousness of the
spiritual being. This is the second of the three transformations; uniting the manifested existence
with what is above it, it is the middle step of the three, the decisive transition of the spiritually
evolving nature.

If the spirit could from the first dwell securely on the superior heights and deal with a blank and
virgin stuff of mind and matter, a complete spiritual transformation might be rapid, even facile:
but the actual process of Nature is more difficult, the logic of her movement more manifold,
contorted, winding, comprehensive; she recognises all the data of the task she has set to herself
and is not satisfied with a summary triumph over her own complexities. Every part of our being
has to be taken in its own nature and character, with all the moulds and writings of the past still
there in it: each minutest portion and movement must either be destroyed and replaced if it is
unfit, or, if it is capable, transmuted into the truth of the higher being. If the psychic change is
complete, this can be done by a painless process, though still the programme must be long and
scrupulous and the progress deliberate; but otherwise one has to be satisfied with a partial result
or, if one’s own scrupulousness of perfection or hunger of the spirit is insatiable, consent to a
difficult, often painful and seemingly interminable action. For ordinarily the consciousness does
not rise to the summits except in the highest moments; it remains on the mental level and
receives descents from above, sometimes a single descent of some spiritual power that stays
and moulds the being into something predominatingly spiritual, or a succession of descents
bringing into it more and more of the spiritual status and dynamis: but unless one can live on the
highest height reached, there cannot be the complete or more integral change. If the psychic
mutation has not taken place, if there has been a premature pulling down of the higher Forces,
their contact may be too strong for the flawed and impure material of Nature and its immediate
fate may be that of the unbaked jar of the Veda which could not hold the divine Soma Wine; or
the descending influence may withdraw or be spilt because the nature cannot contain or keep it.
Again, if it is Power that descends, the egoistic mind or vital may try to seize on it for its own use
and a magnified ego or a hunting after powers and self-aggrandising masteries may be the
untoward result. The Ananda descending cannot be held if there is too much sexual impurity
creating an intoxicant or degrading mixture; the Power recedes, if there is ambition, vanity or
other aggressive form of lower self, the Light if there is an attachment to obscurity or to any form
of the Ignorance, the Presence if the chamber of the heart has not been made pure. Or some
undivine Force may try to seize hold, not of the Power itself, for that withdraws, but of the result
of force it leaves behind in the instrument and use it for the purposes of the Adversary. Even if
none of these more disastrous faults or errors should take place, still the numerous mistakes of
reception or the imperfections of the vessel may impede the transformation. The Power has to
come at intervals and work meanwhile behind the veil or hold itself back through long periods of
obscure assimilation or preparation of the recalcitrant parts of Nature; the Light has to work in
darkness or semi-darkness on the regions in us that are still in the Night. At any moment the
work may be stayed, personally for this life, because the nature is able to receive or assimilate
no more, — for it has reached the present limits of its capacity, — or because the mind may be
ready but the vital, when faced with a choice between the old life and the new, refuses, or if the
vital accepts, the body may prove too weak, unfit or flawed for the necessary change of its
consciousness and its dynamic transformation.

Moreover, the necessity of working out the change separately in each
part of the being in its own nature and character compels the consciousness
to descend into each in turn and act there according to its state and its
possibility. If the work were done from above, from some spiritual height,
there might be a sublimation or uplifting or the creation of a new structure
compelled by the sheer force of the influence from above: but this change
might not be accepted as native to itself by the lower being; it would not
be a total growth, an integral evolution, but a partial and imposed
formation, affecting or liberating some parts of the being, suppressing
others or leaving them as they were; a creation from outside the normal
nature, by imposition upon it, it could be durable in its entirety only as
long as there was a maintenance of the creating influence. A descent of
consciousness into the lower levels is therefore necessary, but in this way
also it is difficult to work out the full power of the higher principle;
there is a modification, dilution, diminution which keeps up an imperfection
and limitation in the results: the light of a greater knowledge comes down
but gets blurred and modified, its significance misinterpreted or its truth
mixed with mental and vital error, or the force, the power to fulfil itself
is not commensurate with its light. A light and power of the Overmind
working in its own full right and in its own sphere is one thing, the same
light working in the obscurity of the physical consciousness and under its
conditions is something quite different and, owing to dilution and mixture,
far inferior in its knowledge and force and results. A mutilated power, a
partial effect or hampered movement is the consequence.

This is indeed the reason of the slow and difficult emergence of the
Consciousness-Force in Nature: for Mind and Life have to descend into Matter
and suit themselves to its conditions; changed and diminished by the
obscurity and reluctant inertia of the substance and force in which they
work, they are not able to make a complete transformation of their material
into a fit instrument and a changed substance revelatory of their real and
native power. The Life-consciousness is unable to effectuate the greatness
and felicity of its mighty or beautiful impulses in the material existence;
its impetus fails it, its force of effectuation is inferior to the truth of
its conceptions, the form betrays the Life-intuition within it which it
tries to render into terms of Life-being. The Mind is unable to achieve its
high ideas in the medium of Life or Matter without deductions and
compromises which deprive them of their divinity; its clarities of knowledge
and will are not matched by its force to mould this inferior substance to
obey and express it: on the contrary, its own powers get affected, its will
is divided, its knowledge confused and clouded by the turbidities of life and
the incomprehensiveness of Matter. Neither Life nor Mind succeeds in
converting or perfecting the material existence, because they cannot attain
to their own full force in these conditions; they need to call in a higher
power to liberate and fulfil them. But the higher spiritual-mental powers
also undergo the same disability when they descend into Life and Matter; they
can do much more, achieve much luminous change, but the modification, the
limitation, the disparity between the consciousness that comes in and the
force of effectuation that it can mentalise and materialise, are constantly
there and the result is a diminished creation. The change made is often
extraordinary, there is even something which looks like a total conversion
and reversal of the state of consciousness and an uplifting of its movements,
but it is not dynamically absolute.

Only the Supermind can thus descend without losing its full power of
action; for its action is always intrinsic and automatic, its will and
knowledge identical and the result commensurate: its nature is a
self-achieving Truth-Consciousness and, if it limits itself or its working,
it is by choice and intention, not by compulsion; in the limits it chooses
its action and the results of its action are harmonious and inevitable.
Again, Overmind is, like Mind, a dividing principle, and its characteristic
operation is to work out in an independent formation a selected harmony; its
global action enables it indeed to create a harmony whole and perfect in
itself or to unite or fuse its harmonies together, to synthetise; but,
labouring under the restrictions of Mind, Life and Matter, it is obliged to
do it by sections and their joinings.
Its tendency of totality is hampered by its selective tendency which is
accentuated by the nature of the mental and life material in which it is
working here; what it can achieve is separate limited spiritual creations
each perfect in itself, but not the integral knowledge and its manifestation.
For this reason and because of the diminishing of its native light and power
it is unable to do fully what is needed and has to call in a greater power,
the supramental force, to liberate and fulfil it. As the psychic change has
to call in the spiritual to complete it, so the first spiritual change has
to call in the supramental transformation to complete it. For all these
steps forward are, like those before them, transitional; the whole radical
change in the evolution from a basis of Ignorance to a basis of Knowledge
can only come by the intervention of the supramental Power and its direct
action in earth-existence.

This then must be the nature of the third and final transformation
which finishes the passage of the soul through the Ignorance and bases its
consciousness, its life, its power and form of manifestation on a complete
and completely effective self-knowledge. The Truth-Consciousness, finding
evolutionary Nature ready, has to descend into her and enable her to liberate
the supramental principle within her; so must be created the supramental
and spiritual being as the first unveiled manifestation of the truth of the
Self and Spirit in the material universe.

Click to continue reading:
THE LIFE DIVINE, by Sri Aurobindo: Book Two, Chapter Twenty-Six, “The Ascent towards Supermind” (Part 1 of 5)